Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, section of Microbiology, University of Catania, Italy.
Specialist Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Unit, Public Health Wales, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Dec;23:334-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
Many clinical laboratories have difficulty in routinely performing in vitro fosfomycin susceptibility testing using the agar dilution (AD) method, considered to be the gold standard method. The objective of our work was to evaluate a rapid commercial fosfomycin agar dilution panel against clinical Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacterales strains, in two different centres located in Italy and in the UK.
A total of 99 Enterobacterales (mostly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and 80 S. aureus clinical isolates was used to evaluate the commercial device, a 12-well panel containing fosfomycin incorporated into CA-MH agar supplemented with 25mg/L of glucose-6-phosphate (Liofilchem S.r.l., Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Testing was performed in two centres (Italy and UK) and kit results were compared against the gold standard in-house AD MIC method.
According to the EUCAST breakpoints, fosfomycin inhibited 61% of the S. aureus strains, and 76% of the Enterobacterales isolates tested by the AD reference method. There was a Categorical Agreement (CA) of 100% and an Essential Agreement (EA) of 91.25% for S. aureus; while the Enterobacterales strains showed a CA of 94% and an EA of 97%. No evaluation errors were observed among S. aureus, while 5% Major Error and 1% Very Major Error were observed for the Enterobacterales.
Our results confirmed the feasibility of determining fosfomycin susceptibility using a commercial AD panel as a routine substitution for the AD test. The few differences observed were only in strains with MICs around the breakpoint used.
许多临床实验室难以常规使用琼脂稀释(AD)法进行磷霉素药敏试验,AD 法被认为是金标准方法。我们的工作目的是评估一种快速商业磷霉素琼脂稀释板在意大利和英国的两个不同中心对临床金黄色葡萄球菌和肠杆菌科菌株的适用性。
共使用了 99 株肠杆菌科(主要是大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌)和 80 株金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株来评估商业设备,该商业设备是一个包含磷霉素的 12 孔板,掺入 CA-MH 琼脂中,并添加 25mg/L 的葡萄糖-6-磷酸(Liofilchem S.r.l.,意大利罗塞托 degli Abruzzi)。测试在两个中心(意大利和英国)进行,试剂盒结果与内部 AD MIC 金标准方法进行比较。
根据 EUCAST 折点,AD 参考方法抑制了 61%的金黄色葡萄球菌和 76%的肠杆菌科分离株。金黄色葡萄球菌的分类一致性(CA)为 100%,基本一致率(EA)为 91.25%;而肠杆菌科菌株的 CA 为 94%,EA 为 97%。在金黄色葡萄球菌中未观察到任何评估错误,而肠杆菌科分离株中观察到 5%的重大错误和 1%的非常重大错误。
我们的结果证实了使用商业 AD 板作为 AD 试验的常规替代方法来确定磷霉素药敏性的可行性。仅在接近使用的折点 MIC 的菌株中观察到一些差异。