Relph Sophie, Delaney Louisa, Melaugh Alexandra, Vieira Matias C, Sandall Jane, Khalil Asma, Pasupathy Dharmintra, Healey Andy
Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 30;10(10):e040022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040022.
The aim of this review was to summarise the current evidence on the costing of resource use within UK maternity care, in order to facilitate the estimation of incremental resource and cost impacts potentially attributable to maternity care interventions.
A systematic review of economic evaluations was conducted by searching Medline, the Health Management Information Consortium, the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluations Database, CINAHL and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for economic evaluations within UK maternity care, published between January 2010 and August 2019 in the English language. Unit costs for healthcare activities provided to women within the antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal period were inflated to 2018-2019 prices. Assessment of study quality was performed using the Quality of Health Economic Analyses checklist.
Of 5084 titles or full texts screened, 37 papers were included in the final review (27 primary research articles, 7 review articles and 3 economic evaluations from NICE guidelines). Of the 27 primary research articles, 21 were scored as high quality, 3 as medium quality and 3 were low quality. Variation was noted in cost estimates for healthcare activities throughout the maternity care pathway: for midwife-led outpatient appointment, the range was £27.34-£146.25 (mean £81.78), emergency caesarean section, range was £1056.44-£4982.21 (mean £3508.93) and postnatal admission, range was £103.00-£870.10 per day (mean £469.55).
Wide variation exists in costs applied to maternity healthcare activities, resulting in challenges in attributing cost to maternity activities. The level of variation in cost calculations is likely to reflect the uncertainty within the system and must be dealt with by conducting sensitivity analyses. Nationally agreed prices for granular unit costs are needed to standardise cost-effectiveness evaluations of new interventions within maternity care, to be used either for research purposes or decisions regarding national intervention uptake.
CRD42019145309.
本综述旨在总结英国孕产妇护理中资源使用成本的现有证据,以便估计孕产妇护理干预可能产生的增量资源和成本影响。
通过检索Medline、健康管理信息联盟、国民健康服务(NHS)经济评估数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)以及英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于2010年1月至2019年8月期间以英文发表的英国孕产妇护理经济评估指南,对经济评估进行系统综述。将产前、产时和产后为女性提供的医疗保健活动的单位成本换算为2018 - 2019年的价格。使用健康经济分析质量清单对研究质量进行评估。
在筛选的5084篇标题或全文中,37篇论文纳入了最终综述(27篇原发性研究文章、7篇综述文章和3篇来自NICE指南的经济评估)。在27篇原发性研究文章中,21篇被评为高质量,3篇为中等质量,3篇为低质量。在整个孕产妇护理路径中,医疗保健活动的成本估计存在差异:助产士主导的门诊预约,范围为27.34英镑至146.25英镑(平均81.78英镑);急诊剖宫产,范围为1056.44英镑至4982.21英镑(平均3508.93英镑);产后住院,范围为每天103.00英镑至870.10英镑(平均469.55英镑)。
孕产妇医疗保健活动的成本存在很大差异,这给将成本归因于孕产妇活动带来了挑战。成本计算的差异程度可能反映了系统内的不确定性,必须通过进行敏感性分析来处理。需要全国统一的细粒度单位成本价格,以规范孕产妇护理新干预措施的成本效益评估,用于研究目的或关于国家干预采用的决策。
CRD42019145309。