Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, C/Mas Casanovas, 90, 4ª planta (Secretaria Neurologia), 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 30;10(1):18749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75750-x.
There is little information on the characteristics of patients with wake-up intracerebral hemorrhage (WU-ICH). We aimed to evaluate frequency and relevant differences between WU-ICH and while-awake (WA) ICH patients. This is a retrospective study of a prospective database of consecutive patients with spontaneous ICH, who were classified as WU-ICH, WA-ICH or UO-ICH (unclear onset). We collected demographic, clinical and radiological data, prognostic and therapeutic variables, and outcome [(neurological deterioration, mortality, functional outcome (favorable when modified Rankin scale score 0-2)]. From a total of 466 patients, 98 (25.8%) were classified as UO-ICH according to the type of onset and therefore excluded. We studied 368 patients (mean age 73.9 ± 13.8, 51.4% men), and compared 95 (25.8%) WU-ICH with 273 (74.2%) WA-ICH. Patients from the WU-ICH group were significantly older than WA-ICH (76.9 ± 14.3 vs 72.8 ± 13.6, p = 0.01) but the vascular risk factors were similar. Compared to the WA-ICH group, patients from the WU-ICH group had a lower GCS score or a higher NIHSS score and a higher ICH score, and were less often admitted to a stroke unit or intensive care unit. There were no differences between groups in location, volume, rate of hematoma growth, frequency of intraventricular hemorrhage and outcome. One in five patients with spontaneous ICH are WU-ICH patients. Other than age, there are no relevant differences between WU and WA groups. Although WU-ICH is associated with worse prognostic markers vital and functional outcome is similar to WA-ICH patients.
关于觉醒型脑出血(WU-ICH)患者的特征,相关信息较少。我们旨在评估 WU-ICH 与清醒型(WA)ICH 患者的频率和相关差异。这是一项连续自发性脑出血患者前瞻性数据库的回顾性研究,这些患者被分为 WU-ICH、WA-ICH 或 UO-ICH(不明发病)。我们收集了人口统计学、临床和影像学数据、预后和治疗变量以及结局[(神经功能恶化、死亡率、功能结局(改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2 时为有利)]。共有 466 名患者,其中 98 名(25.8%)根据发病类型为 UO-ICH,因此被排除在外。我们研究了 368 名患者(平均年龄 73.9±13.8 岁,51.4%为男性),并比较了 95 名(25.8%)WU-ICH 患者和 273 名(74.2%)WA-ICH 患者。WU-ICH 组患者明显比 WA-ICH 组年龄更大(76.9±14.3 岁 vs 72.8±13.6 岁,p=0.01),但血管危险因素相似。与 WA-ICH 组相比,WU-ICH 组患者的 GCS 评分更低或 NIHSS 评分更高、ICH 评分更高,入住卒中单元或重症监护病房的比例更低。两组患者的发病部位、出血量、血肿增长速度、脑室内出血频率和结局无差异。五分之一的自发性脑出血患者为 WU-ICH 患者。除年龄外,WU 和 WA 组之间无其他明显差异。尽管 WU-ICH 与预后不良标志物相关,但患者的生命和功能结局与 WA-ICH 患者相似。