Department of Hematology, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Apr;56(4):828-840. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-01097-6. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
We assessed the impact of donor type on long-term outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in 440 consecutive adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1), particularly focusing on the donor type-specific difference in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Donor sources were matched sibling donor (MSD; n = 199), matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 110), 1-allele-mismatched unrelated donor (1-MMUD; n = 83), and cord blood (CB; n = 48). Cumulative incidence of severe chronic GVHD was 14.8% for MSD-HCT, 30.1% for MUD-HCT, 9.6% for 1-MMUD-HCT, and 4.2% for CBT, respectively (P < 0.001), while no difference was observed in grade III-IV acute GVHD. After a median follow-up of 58.1 months, cumulative incidence of relapse was 26.1% for MSD-HCT, 27.2% for MUD-HCT, 31.2% for 1-MMUD-HCT, and 7.2% for CBT, respectively (P = 0.042). Disease-free survival and overall survival were comparable among all donor sources. However, GRFS for MSD-HCT, MUD-HCT, 1-MMUD-HCT, and CBT was 33.1%, 14.5%, 42.1%, and 50.3%, respectively (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CBT showed a comparable GRFS to MSD-HCT (HR, 0.78; P = 0.290), while MUD-HCT was associated with a poorer GRFS (HR, 1.53; P = 0.002). Given the encouraging GRFS of CBT, our data suggest that CBT remains a valid option for adult ALL in CR1.
我们评估了 440 例急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)成人患者在首次完全缓解(CR1)中异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)后供体类型对长期结果的影响,尤其关注移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)-无/无复发(GRFS)方面供体类型的差异。供体来源为匹配的同胞供体(MSD;n=199)、匹配的无关供体(MUD;n=110)、1 个等位基因错配无关供体(1-MMUD;n=83)和脐带血(CB;n=48)。MSD-HCT、MUD-HCT、1-MMUD-HCT 和 CBT 患者的重度慢性 GVHD 累积发生率分别为 14.8%、30.1%、9.6%和 4.2%(P<0.001),而 3-4 级急性 GVHD 发生率无差异。中位随访 58.1 个月后,MSD-HCT、MUD-HCT、1-MMUD-HCT 和 CBT 患者的复发累积发生率分别为 26.1%、27.2%、31.2%和 7.2%(P=0.042)。所有供体来源的无病生存和总生存相当。然而,MSD-HCT、MUD-HCT、1-MMUD-HCT 和 CBT 的 GRFS 分别为 33.1%、14.5%、42.1%和 50.3%(P=0.001)。多变量分析显示,CBT 的 GRFS 与 MSD-HCT 相当(HR,0.78;P=0.290),而 MUD-HCT 与较差的 GRFS 相关(HR,1.53;P=0.002)。鉴于 CBT 令人鼓舞的 GRFS,我们的数据表明,CBT 仍然是 CR1 成人 ALL 的有效选择。