Suppr超能文献

关于裸鼹鼠生物学的过早结论竟有着惊人的长期存在。

Surprisingly long survival of premature conclusions about naked mole-rat biology.

作者信息

Braude Stan, Holtze Susanne, Begall Sabine, Brenmoehl Julia, Burda Hynek, Dammann Philip, Del Marmol Delphine, Gorshkova Ekaterina, Henning Yoshiyuki, Hoeflich Andreas, Höhn Annika, Jung Tobias, Hamo Dania, Sahm Arne, Shebzukhov Yury, Šumbera Radim, Miwa Satomi, Vyssokikh Mikhail Y, von Zglinicki Thomas, Averina Olga, Hildebrandt Thomas B

机构信息

Biology Department, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, U.S.A.

Department of Reproduction Management, Leibniz-Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, 10315, Germany.

出版信息

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Apr;96(2):376-393. doi: 10.1111/brv.12660. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

Abstract

Naked mole-rats express many unusual traits for such a small rodent. Their morphology, social behaviour, physiology, and ageing have been well studied over the past half-century. Many early findings and speculations about this subterranean species persist in the literature, although some have been repeatedly questioned or refuted. While the popularity of this species as a natural-history curiosity, and oversimplified story-telling in science journalism, might have fuelled the perpetuation of such misconceptions, an accurate understanding of their biology is especially important for this new biomedical model organism. We review 28 of these persistent myths about naked mole-rat sensory abilities, ecophysiology, social behaviour, development and ageing, and where possible we explain how these misunderstandings came about.

摘要

裸鼹鼠作为一种小型啮齿动物,表现出许多不同寻常的特征。在过去的半个世纪里,它们的形态、社会行为、生理学和衰老过程都得到了充分研究。关于这种地下物种的许多早期发现和推测在文献中仍然存在,尽管其中一些已经多次受到质疑或反驳。虽然该物种作为一种自然历史奇观很受欢迎,且科学新闻报道中存在过于简单化的叙述,这可能助长了此类误解的持续存在,但准确了解它们的生物学特性对于这种新型生物医学模式生物尤为重要。我们回顾了28个关于裸鼹鼠感官能力、生态生理学、社会行为、发育和衰老的长期存在的误解,并尽可能解释这些误解是如何产生的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验