• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准与外翻改良双钉技术在直肠癌切除术后低位直肠吻合中的比较。

Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer.

机构信息

The Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Policlinico Umberto Primo, Viale del Policlinico, 00166, Rome, Italy.

The Department of Surgical Oncology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2021 May;51(5):785-791. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5
PMID:33128593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8055572/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The double-staple technique, performed as either the standard procedure or after eversion of the rectal stump, is a well-established method of performing low colorectal anastomoses following the resection of rectal cancer. Eversion of the tumor-bearing ano-rectal stump was proposed to allow the linear stapler to be fired at a safe distance of clearance from the tumor. We conducted this study to compare the results of the standard versus the eversion-modified double-staple technique.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 753 consecutive patients who underwent low stapled colorectal anastomosis after resection of rectal cancer. The patients were divided into two groups according to the method of anastomosis used: Group A comprised 165 patients (22%) treated with the modified eversion technique and group B comprised 588 patients (78%) treated with the standard technique. The primary endpoints of the study were postoperative mortality, surgery-related morbidity, the number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum, and late disease-related survival.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality was 1.2% in group A and 1.7% in group B (p = 0.66). Postoperative morbidity was 12% in group A and 11% in group B (p = 0.75). The mean number of sampled lymph nodes in the mesorectum was 23 (range 17-27) in group A and 24 (range 19-29) in group B (p = 0.06). The 5-year disease-related survival was 73% in group A and 74% in group B (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

The standard and eversion-modified double-staple techniques yield comparable results.

摘要

目的

双钉技术,无论是作为标准程序还是在直肠残端外翻后进行,都是直肠切除术后进行低位结直肠吻合的成熟方法。提出外翻肿瘤-bearing 肛门直肠残端,是为了让线性吻合器在距离肿瘤安全的清除距离内点火。我们进行这项研究是为了比较标准技术与外翻改良双钉技术的结果。

方法

本回顾性研究的对象是 753 例连续接受低位吻合器结直肠吻合术的直肠癌患者。根据吻合方法的不同,将患者分为两组:A 组 165 例(22%)采用改良外翻技术,B 组 588 例(78%)采用标准技术。研究的主要终点是术后死亡率、与手术相关的发病率、直肠系膜中采样的淋巴结数量以及晚期疾病相关的生存。

结果

A 组术后死亡率为 1.2%,B 组为 1.7%(p=0.66)。A 组术后发病率为 12%,B 组为 11%(p=0.75)。A 组直肠系膜中采样的淋巴结平均数为 23 个(范围 17-27),B 组为 24 个(范围 19-29)(p=0.06)。A 组 5 年疾病相关生存率为 73%,B 组为 74%(p=0.75)。

结论

标准技术和外翻改良双钉技术的结果相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60e/8055572/925d6a0d4038/595_2020_2174_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60e/8055572/4005af461d5f/595_2020_2174_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60e/8055572/8afe5e4e7f91/595_2020_2174_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60e/8055572/925d6a0d4038/595_2020_2174_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60e/8055572/4005af461d5f/595_2020_2174_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60e/8055572/8afe5e4e7f91/595_2020_2174_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b60e/8055572/925d6a0d4038/595_2020_2174_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer.标准与外翻改良双钉技术在直肠癌切除术后低位直肠吻合中的比较。
Surg Today. 2021 May;51(5):785-791. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02174-5. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
2
Colorectal eversion technique combined with modified single-stapled double-purse-string low colorectal anastomosis.经肛门直肠外翻技术联合改良单吻合器双荷包低位直肠端端吻合术。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):772-775. doi: 10.1111/codi.16907. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
3
Long-term Evaluation of a Modified Double Staple Technique for Low Anterior Resection.改良双吻合器技术用于低位前切除术的长期评估
Acta Chir Belg. 2014 Sep-Oct;114(5):338-43.
4
Morbidity and mortality after single- and double-stapled colorectal anastomoses in patients with carcinoma of the rectum.直肠癌患者单吻合器与双吻合器结直肠吻合术后的发病率和死亡率
Aust N Z J Surg. 1996 Dec;66(12):820-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00757.x.
5
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction With Single Stapling Colorectal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Anterior Resection: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Technical Considerations.经自然腔道标本取出术联合单吻合器技术行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术:可行性、疗效及技术要点
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000739.
6
Laparoscopic modified double stapling technique with transanal resection for low anterior resection of rectal cancer.腹腔镜改良双吻合器技术联合经肛门切除术用于直肠癌低位前切除术
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:78-82.
7
Rectovaginal fistula following low circular stapled anastomosis in women with rectal cancer.直肠癌女性患者低位圆形吻合器吻合术后的直肠阴道瘘
J Surg Oncol. 1996 Feb;61(2):155-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199602)61:2<155::AID-JSO12>3.0.CO;2-8.
8
A novel laparoscopic technique for stapled colon and rectal anastomosis.一种用于吻合器结肠和直肠吻合术的新型腹腔镜技术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2003 Oct;7(3):192-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-003-0034-4.
9
Stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a prospective study.结直肠手术中的吻合器吻合术:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Surg. 1996 Oct;162(10):805-10.
10
[Application value of laparoscopic double stapler firings and double stapling technique combined with rectal eversion and total extra-abdominal resection in the sphincter-preserving resection of low rectal cancer].腹腔镜双吻合器击发及双吻合技术联合直肠外翻全腹壁外切除在低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用价值
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 25;27(3):283-286. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230806-00034.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic modified double stapling technique with transanal resection for low anterior resection of rectal cancer.腹腔镜改良双吻合器技术联合经肛门切除术用于直肠癌低位前切除术
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:78-82.
2
Long-term Evaluation of a Modified Double Staple Technique for Low Anterior Resection.改良双吻合器技术用于低位前切除术的长期评估
Acta Chir Belg. 2014 Sep-Oct;114(5):338-43.
3
A new technique of totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for large rectal adenoma.一种用于大型直肠腺瘤的完全腹腔镜切除并经自然腔道取标本(NOSE)的新技术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jun;19(6):355-60. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1300-y. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
4
Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective series of 483 patients.低位前切除加全直肠系膜切除术和结肠肛管吻合术后的发病率危险因素:483 例回顾性系列研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):504-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824485c4.
5
Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的肿瘤学及生存结局的多中心分析
Br J Surg. 2009 Sep;96(9):1066-75. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6694.
6
Postoperative morbidity with diversion after low anterior resection in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: a single institution experience.新辅助治疗时代低位前切除术后改行转流术的术后并发症:单机构经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jul;209(1):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 May 28.
7
The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.功能性回肠造口术逆转的发病率:对48项研究(包括6107例病例)的系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jun;24(6):711-23. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0660-z. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
8
Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的危险因素及肿瘤学影响
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jun;51(6):902-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9272-x. Epub 2008 Apr 12.
9
Factors affecting anastomotic complications following anterior resection in rectal cancer.影响直肠癌前切除术后吻合口并发症的因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):801-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01197.x.
10
Surgical repair of an aberrant splenic artery aneurysm: report of a case.异常脾动脉瘤的手术修复:一例报告
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;21(2):216-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.06.014.