Suppr超能文献

使用标准运动学和 CGM2 模型对年轻肥胖人群的步行和爬楼梯运动学的可靠性。

Reliability of walking and stair climbing kinematics in a young obese population using a standard kinematic and the CGM2 model.

机构信息

St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, St. Pölten, Austria.

St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, St. Pölten, Austria.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2021 Jan;83:96-99. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, the successor of the Conventional Gait Model, the CGM2 was introduced. Even though achievable reliability of gait kinematics is a well-assessed topic in gait analysis for several models, information about reliability in difficult study samples with high amount of subcutaneous fat is scarce and to date, not available for the CGM2. Therefore, this study evaluated the test-retest reliability of the CGM2 model for difficult data with high amount of soft tissue artifacts.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the test-retest reliability of the CGM2 during level walking and stair climbing in a young obese population? Is there a clinically relevant difference in reliability between a standard direct kinematic model and the CGM2?

METHODS

A retrospective test-retest dataset from eight male and two female volunteers was used. It comprised standard 3D gait analysis data of three walking conditions: level walking, stair ascent and descent. To quantify test-retest reliability the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was calculated for each kinematic waveform for a direct kinematic model (Cleveland clinic marker set) and the CGM2.

RESULTS

Both models showed an acceptable level of test-retest reliability in all three walking conditions. However, SEM ranged between two and five degrees () for both models and, thus, needs consideration during interpretation. The choice of model did not affect reliability considerably. Differences in SEM between stair climbing and level walking were small and not clinically relevant (<1°).

SIGNIFICANCE

Results showed an acceptable level of reliability and only small differences between the models. It is noteworthy, that the SEM was increased during the first half of swing in all walking conditions. This might be attributed to increased variability resulting for example from inaccurate knee and ankle axis definitions or increased variability in the gait pattern and needs to be considered during data interpretation.

摘要

背景

最近,传统步态模型的继任者 CGM2 问世。尽管对于多个模型来说,步态运动学的可实现可靠性是步态分析中一个评估良好的课题,但关于在皮下脂肪含量较高的困难研究样本中的可靠性信息却很少,迄今为止,CGM2 模型也没有这方面的信息。因此,本研究评估了 CGM2 模型在具有大量软组织伪影的困难数据中的测试-重测可靠性。

研究问题

在年轻肥胖人群中,CGM2 在水平行走和爬楼梯时的测试-重测可靠性如何?标准直接运动学模型和 CGM2 之间的可靠性是否存在临床相关差异?

方法

使用来自 8 名男性和 2 名女性志愿者的回顾性测试-重测数据集。它包括标准的 3D 步态分析数据,涵盖三种行走条件:水平行走、上楼梯和下楼梯。为了量化测试-重测可靠性,为直接运动学模型(克利夫兰诊所标记集)和 CGM2 的每个运动学波形计算了测量标准误差(SEM)。

结果

两种模型在所有三种行走条件下均显示出可接受的测试-重测可靠性水平。然而,SEM 范围在两个到五个度之间(),因此在解释时需要考虑。模型的选择并没有对可靠性产生显著影响。SEM 之间的差异在爬楼梯和水平行走之间较小,不具有临床意义(<1°)。

意义

结果显示出可接受的可靠性水平,并且两种模型之间只有很小的差异。值得注意的是,在所有行走条件下,SEM 在摆动的前半段增加。这可能归因于膝关节和踝关节轴定义不准确或步态模式变化增加等原因导致的变异性增加,在数据解释时需要考虑到这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验