Motion Analysis, Ergonomics, Biomechanics and Motor Control Laboratory (LAMBECOM), Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
International Doctorate School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933 Madrid, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031343.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a conventional gait model (CGM), the Plug-in Gait model, to calculate the angles of the hip, knee, and ankle during initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO). Gait analysis was performed using the Vicon Motion System (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK). The study group consisted of 50 healthy subjects. To evaluate the test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement were calculated. The ICC for the joint angles of the hip, knee, and ankle was higher than 0.80. However, the ankle angle at IC had an ICC lower than 0.80. The SEM was <5° for all parameters. The MDC was large (>5°) for the hip angle at IC. The Bland-Altman analysis indicated that the magnitude of divergence was between ±5° and ±9° at IC and around ±7° at TO. In conclusion, the ICC for the plug-in gait model was good for the hip, knee, and ankle angles during IC and TO. The plots revealed a disagreement between measurements that should be considered in patients' clinical assessments.
本研究旨在评估传统步态模型(CGM)和 Plug-in 步态模型计算初始接触(IC)和足趾离地(TO)时髋关节、膝关节和踝关节角度的重测信度。步态分析采用 Vicon 运动系统(英国牛津的 Oxford Metrics)进行。研究组由 50 名健康受试者组成。为了评估重测信度,计算了组内相关系数(ICC)、测量误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)以及 95%一致性界限的 Bland-Altman 分析。髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的关节角度的 ICC 均高于 0.80。然而,IC 时的踝关节角度的 ICC 低于 0.80。所有参数的 SEM 均小于 5°。IC 时髋关节角度的 MDC 较大(>5°)。Bland-Altman 分析表明,在 IC 和 TO 时,发散的幅度在±5°和±9°之间,在 TO 时约为±7°。总之,Plug-in 步态模型在 IC 和 TO 时髋关节、膝关节和踝关节角度的 ICC 较好。图中显示了测量值之间的差异,在进行患者临床评估时应予以考虑。