Suppr超能文献

跑步过程中传统步态模型2和插入式步态模型的日间可靠性及最小可检测变化

Between-day reliability and minimum detectable change of the Conventional Gait Model 2 and Plug-in Gait Model during running.

作者信息

Okahisa Tetsuya, Matsuura Tetsuya, Tomonari Ken, Komatsu Kouji, Yokoyama Kenji, Iwase Joji, Yamada Megumi, Sairyo Koichi

机构信息

Division of Rehabilitation, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2023 Feb;100:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Plug-in Gait model (PiG) is commonly used in 3D motion analysis but has limited reliability. Although an improved version of PiG has been developed, called the Conventional Gait Model 2 (CGM2), there is limited evidence on its between-day reliability for running.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the between-day intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,k) and minimum detectable change (MDC) of lower limb kinematics and kinetics for CGM2 during running and does reliability differ between CGM2 and PiG.

METHODS

Twenty-three healthy participants performed running at a comfortable speed in two identical test sessions at least 5 days apart. Lower limb kinematic and kinetic data in the three planes of motion were calculated using CGM2 and PiG. The ICC and MDC were calculated for the kinematic and kinetic parameters at initial contact and peak during the stance phase of running.

RESULTS

CGM2 kinematics showed good-to-excellent reliability (ICC: 0.75-0.93), except for hip extension and ankle internal rotation, and less than 5° MDC (1.8°-4.9°) of the coronal and sagittal planes, except for hip extension. PiG showed poor-to-moderate reliability (ICC: -0.15 to 0.72) in the coronal and transverse planes and greater than 5° MDC (5.0°-21.8°), except for knee extension, adduction, and ankle dorsiflexion. CGM2 showed good-to-excellent reliability for peak kinetics (ICC: 0.75-0.97), except for hip internal rotation and knee extension. The ICC and MDC were higher for CGM2 than PiG, with significant differences in the coronal plane of the hip and knee joints and transverse plane of the hip joint in kinematics and in the sagittal and coronal plane of the hip and knee joints in kinetics.

SIGNIFICANCE

The between-day reliability of CGM2 was mostly good to excellent for lower limb kinematics and kinetics during running. We believe that CGM2 can more accurately assess kinematic differences between the coronal and transverse planes than the PiG.

摘要

背景

插件式步态模型(PiG)常用于三维运动分析,但可靠性有限。尽管已开发出PiG的改进版本,即传统步态模型2(CGM2),但其在跑步时的日间可靠性证据有限。

研究问题

CGM2在跑步过程中下肢运动学和动力学的日间组内相关系数(ICC3,k)和最小可检测变化(MDC)是多少,以及CGM2和PiG之间的可靠性是否存在差异。

方法

23名健康参与者以舒适的速度在至少间隔5天的两个相同测试环节中进行跑步。使用CGM2和PiG计算三个运动平面中的下肢运动学和动力学数据。计算跑步支撑相初始接触和峰值时运动学和动力学参数的ICC和MDC。

结果

CGM2运动学显示出良好至优秀的可靠性(ICC:0.75 - 0.93),除了髋关节伸展和踝关节内旋,并且除髋关节伸展外,冠状面和矢状面的MDC小于5°(1.8° - 4.9°)。PiG在冠状面和横断面显示出较差至中等的可靠性(ICC: - 0.15至0.72),并且除膝关节伸展、内收和踝关节背屈外,MDC大于5°(5.0° - 21.8°)。CGM2在峰值动力学方面显示出良好至优秀的可靠性(ICC:0.75 - 0.97),除了髋关节内旋和膝关节伸展外。CGM2的ICC和MDC高于PiG,在运动学方面,髋关节和膝关节冠状面以及髋关节横断面存在显著差异,在动力学方面,髋关节和膝关节矢状面和冠状面存在显著差异。

意义

CGM2在跑步过程中下肢运动学和动力学的日间可靠性大多良好至优秀。我们认为,与PiG相比,CGM2能够更准确地评估冠状面和横断面之间的运动学差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验