Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 31;20(1):1048. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07543-4.
DNA methylation is a potential biomarker for early detection of breast cancer. However, robust evidence of a prospective relationship between DNA methylation patterns and breast cancer risk is still lacking. The objective of this study is to provide a systematic analysis of the findings of epigenome-wide DNA methylation studies on breast cancer risk, in light of their methodological strengths and weaknesses.
We searched major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) from inception up to 30th June 2019, for observational or intervention studies investigating the association between epigenome-wide DNA methylation (using the HM450k or EPIC BeadChip), measured in any type of human sample, and breast cancer risk. A pre-established protocol was drawn up following the Cochrane Reviews rigorous methodology. Study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by at least two investigators. A qualitative synthesis and systematic comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of studies was performed.
Overall, 20 studies using the HM450k BeadChip were included, 17 of which had measured blood-derived DNA methylation. There was a consistent trend toward an association of global blood-derived DNA hypomethylation and higher epigenetic age with higher risk of breast cancer. The strength of associations was modest for global hypomethylation and relatively weak for most of epigenetic age algorithms. Differences in length of follow-up periods may have influenced the ability to detect associations, as studies reporting follow-up periods shorter than 10 years were more likely to observe an association with global DNA methylation. Probe-wise differential methylation analyses identified between one and 806 differentially methylated CpGs positions in 10 studies. None of the identified differentially methylated sites overlapped between studies. Three studies used breast tissue DNA and suffered major methodological issues that precludes any conclusion. Overall risk of bias was critical mainly because of incomplete control of confounding. Important issues relative to data preprocessing could have limited the consistency of results.
Global DNA methylation may be a short-term predictor of breast cancer risk. Further studies with rigorous methodology are needed to determine spatial distribution of DNA hypomethylation and identify differentially methylated sites associated with risk of breast cancer.
CRD42020147244.
DNA 甲基化是乳腺癌早期检测的潜在生物标志物。然而,仍然缺乏强有力的证据表明 DNA 甲基化模式与乳腺癌风险之间存在前瞻性关系。本研究的目的是根据其方法学的优缺点,对有关乳腺癌风险的全基因组 DNA 甲基化研究结果进行系统分析。
我们从 2019 年 6 月 30 日之前的主要数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science、CENTRAL)中搜索了观察性或干预性研究,这些研究调查了在任何类型的人类样本中测量的全基因组 DNA 甲基化(使用 HM450k 或 EPIC BeadChip)与乳腺癌风险之间的关联。根据 Cochrane 综述的严格方法制定了预先制定的方案。至少有两名研究人员进行了研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。对研究的优缺点进行了定性综合和系统比较。
总共纳入了 20 项使用 HM450k BeadChip 的研究,其中 17 项测量了血液来源的 DNA 甲基化。全血衍生 DNA 低甲基化和更高的表观遗传年龄与乳腺癌风险增加之间存在一致的趋势。整体低甲基化的关联强度适中,大多数表观遗传年龄算法的关联强度较弱。随访时间长短的差异可能影响了检测关联的能力,因为报告随访时间短于 10 年的研究更有可能观察到与全基因组 DNA 甲基化相关的关联。探针特异性差异甲基化分析在 10 项研究中确定了 1 至 806 个差异甲基化 CpG 位置。研究之间没有重叠的鉴定出的差异甲基化位点。三项研究使用乳腺组织 DNA,但存在严重的方法学问题,无法得出任何结论。总体偏倚风险主要是由于对混杂因素的控制不完整而至关重要。与数据预处理相关的重要问题可能限制了结果的一致性。
全基因组 DNA 甲基化可能是乳腺癌风险的短期预测指标。需要进一步进行严格方法学的研究,以确定 DNA 低甲基化的空间分布,并确定与乳腺癌风险相关的差异甲基化位点。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020147244。