University of Maryland Baltimore County, Department of Biological Sciences, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, United States.
Ocean Research and Conservation Association, 1420 Seaway Dr, Fort Pierce, FL 34949, United States.
Harmful Algae. 2020 Sep;98:101850. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2020.101850. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
Dinoflagellates are an ecologically important group of marine microbial eukaryotes with a remarkable array of adaptive strategies. It is ironic that two of the traits for which dinoflagellates are best known, toxin production and bioluminescence, are rarely linked when considering the ecological significance of either. Although dinoflagellate species that form some of the most widespread and frequent harmful algal blooms (HABs) are bioluminescent, the molecular and eco-evolutionary associations between these two traits has received little attention. Here, the major themes of biochemistry and genetics, ecological functions, signaling mechanisms, and evolution are addressed, with parallels and connections drawn between the two. Of the 17 major classes of dinoflagellate toxins, only two are produced by bioluminescent species: saxitoxin (STX) and yessotoxin. Of these, STX has been extensively studied, including the identification of the STX biosynthetic genes. While numerous theories have been put forward as to the eco-evolutionary roles of both bioluminescence and toxicity, a general consensus is that both function as grazing deterrents. Thus, both bioluminescence and toxicity may aid in HAB initiation as they alleviate grazing pressure on the HAB species. A large gap in our understanding is the genetic variability among natural bloom populations, as both toxic and non-toxic strains have been isolated from the same geographic location. The same applies to bioluminescence, as there exist both bioluminescent and non-bioluminescent strains of the same species. Recent evidence demonstrating that blooms are not monoclonal events necessitates a greater level of understanding as to the genetic variability of these traits among sub-populations as well as the mechanisms by which cells acquire or lose the trait, as sequence analysis of STX+ and STX- species indicate the key gene required for toxicity is lost rather than gained. While the extent of genetic variability for both bioluminescence and toxicity among natural HAB sub-populations remains unknown, it is an area that needs to be explored in order to gain greater insights into the molecular mechanisms and environmental parameters driving HAB evolution.
甲藻是一类具有显著适应性策略的海洋微生物真核生物,在生态上具有重要意义。具有讽刺意味的是,甲藻最广为人知的两个特征——产生毒素和生物发光——在考虑到这两个特征的生态意义时很少联系在一起。虽然形成一些最广泛和频繁的有害藻华(HAB)的甲藻物种具有生物发光性,但这两种特征之间的分子和生态进化关联却很少受到关注。在这里,生物化学和遗传学、生态功能、信号机制和进化等主要主题都得到了探讨,并在两者之间建立了平行和联系。在 17 种主要的甲藻毒素中,只有两种是由生物发光物种产生的:石房蛤毒素(STX)和膝沟藻毒素。其中,STX 已被广泛研究,包括 STX 生物合成基因的鉴定。虽然已经提出了许多关于生物发光和毒性的生态进化作用的理论,但人们普遍认为,两者都作为摄食防御作用。因此,生物发光和毒性都可能有助于 HAB 的启动,因为它们减轻了对 HAB 物种的摄食压力。我们对自然藻华种群的遗传变异性的理解存在很大的差距,因为在同一地理位置已经分离出了有毒和无毒的菌株。生物发光也是如此,因为同一物种既有生物发光的也有无生物发光的菌株。最近的证据表明,藻华不是单克隆事件,这就需要我们更深入地了解这些特征在亚种群中的遗传变异性,以及细胞获得或失去该特征的机制,因为对 STX+和 STX-物种的序列分析表明,毒性所需的关键基因是丢失而不是获得。虽然自然 HAB 亚种群中生物发光和毒性的遗传变异性程度尚不清楚,但这是一个需要探索的领域,以便更深入地了解驱动 HAB 进化的分子机制和环境参数。