Division of Hospital Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado, USA; Office of Research, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Kidney Int. 2021 Jan;99(1):198-207. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.024. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
Undocumented immigrants with kidney failure can only access dialysis after presenting critically ill to an emergency department in most states within the United States. How access to scheduled dialysis might improve or harm patient experience is currently unknown. To clarify this, we assessed patient reported outcomes and experiences of undocumented patients who transitioned from emergency to scheduled dialysis. Pre-post intervention interviews were conducted using a mixed-methods study (questionnaires and interviews) in a Colorado hospital. Measures included the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form-36 (KDQOL SF-36), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, Trust in Physician Scale, and CHOICE Satisfaction Scale. Interviews were evaluated using thematic analysis. Thirty patients participated, and 26 completed the post-transition interview (two participants died, two did not transition to scheduled dialysis). Following transition, patients significantly improved on all five KDQOL SF-36 subscales including 116% for burden of kidney disease, 42% for kidney disease effects, 27% for symptoms/problems, 23% for physical and 13% for mental health composite. Patients reported significant improvement in seven symptoms consisting of 100% for nausea, 57% for pain, 94% for appetite and shortness of breath, 87% for anxiety, 86% for depression, 65% for tiredness, and 60% for drowsiness. Trust and satisfaction with care were unchanged. Five identified themes corroborated patient-reported outcomes but indicated continuing challenges associated with anxiety about navigating changes in care, increased burden on family and employers, relief in receiving consistent care, immediate and remarkable health gains, and restoring hope and humanity. Thus, providing healthcare access to standard dialysis for undocumented immigrants improved quality of life and mitigated debilitating symptoms but brought new challenges in healthcare navigation as well as family burden and work.
未获得合法身份的肾衰竭移民只有在美国大多数州的急诊部门出现病危情况时才能接受透析治疗。目前尚不清楚接受定期透析治疗可能会改善或损害患者的体验。为了阐明这一点,我们评估了从急诊转为定期透析的未获得合法身份患者的报告结果和体验。在科罗拉多州的一家医院,采用混合方法研究(问卷调查和访谈)进行了干预前后的访谈。评估指标包括肾脏病生活质量简表-36 项(KDQOL SF-36)、埃德蒙顿症状评估系统、医生信任量表和 CHOICE 满意度量表。访谈采用主题分析法进行评估。共有 30 名患者参与,其中 26 名患者在完成过渡后接受了访谈(2 名患者死亡,2 名患者未过渡到定期透析)。过渡后,患者在 KDQOL SF-36 的所有五个子量表上均有显著改善,其中肾病负担改善 116%,肾病影响改善 42%,症状/问题改善 27%,身体状况改善 23%,心理健康改善 13%。患者报告称,有七种症状得到显著改善,包括恶心症状改善 100%,疼痛改善 57%,食欲和呼吸急促改善 94%,焦虑改善 87%,抑郁改善 86%,疲倦改善 65%,瞌睡改善 60%。对医疗服务的信任和满意度没有变化。五个主题印证了患者报告的结果,但表明与担心医疗服务变化相关的挑战仍然存在,对家庭和雇主的负担增加,接受一致医疗服务的缓解,立即获得显著的健康收益,以及恢复希望和人性。因此,为未获得合法身份的移民提供标准透析治疗,提高了生活质量,减轻了衰弱症状,但也带来了医疗服务导航方面的新挑战,以及家庭负担和工作方面的挑战。