• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在合作中进行和传播脊髓损伤研究的综合知识转化指导原则。

Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.

机构信息

School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393
PMID:33129763
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To address a gap between spinal cord injury (SCI) research and practice by rigorously and systematically co-developing integrated knowledge translation (IKT) guiding principles for conducting and disseminating SCI research in partnership with research users.

DESIGN

The process was guided by the internationally accepted The Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument for evaluating the development of clinical practice guidelines.

SETTING

North American SCI research system (ie, SCI researchers, research users, funders).

PARTICIPANTS

The multidisciplinary expert panel (n=17) and end users (n=35) included individuals from a North American partnership of SCI researchers, research users, and funders who have expertise in research partnerships.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clarity, usefulness, and appropriateness of the principles.

RESULTS

Data regarding 125 principles of partnered research were systematically collected from 4 sources (review of reviews, scoping review, interviews, Delphi consensus exercise). A multidisciplinary expert panel held a 2-day meeting to establish consensus, select guiding principles, and draft the guidance. The panel reached 100% consensus on the principles and guidance document. The final document includes a preamble, 8 guiding principles, and a glossary. Survey data showed that the principles and guidance document were perceived by potential end users as clear, useful, and appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

The IKT Guiding Principles represent the first rigorously co-developed, consensus-based guidance to support meaningful SCI research partnerships. The principles are a foundational tool with the potential to improve the relevance and impact of SCI research, mitigate tokenism, and advance the science of IKT.

摘要

目的

通过与研究用户合作,严格系统地共同制定用于开展和传播脊髓损伤(SCI)研究的综合知识转化(IKT)指导原则,解决 SCI 研究与实践之间的差距。

设计

该过程遵循国际公认的评估指南研究与评价(AGREE)II 工具,用于评估临床实践指南的制定。

设置

北美 SCI 研究系统(即 SCI 研究人员、研究用户、资助者)。

参与者

多学科专家小组(n=17)和最终用户(n=35)包括来自北美 SCI 研究人员、研究用户和资助者合作关系的个人,他们在研究合作方面拥有专业知识。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

原则的清晰度、有用性和适当性。

结果

从 4 个来源(综述回顾、范围综述、访谈、德尔菲共识练习)系统地收集了 125 条合作研究原则的数据。一个多学科专家小组举行了为期两天的会议,以达成共识、选择指导原则并起草指导意见。该小组对原则和指导文件达成了 100%的共识。最终文件包括前言、8 项指导原则和词汇表。调查数据表明,潜在的最终用户认为原则和指导文件清晰、有用且适用。

结论

IKT 指导原则代表了第一个经过严格共同制定、基于共识的指导,旨在支持有意义的 SCI 研究合作。这些原则是一个基础工具,有可能提高 SCI 研究的相关性和影响力,减轻象征性做法,并推进 IKT 科学。

相似文献

1
Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.在合作中进行和传播脊髓损伤研究的综合知识转化指导原则。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Principles to guide spinal cord injury research partnerships: a Delphi consensus study.指导脊髓损伤研究合作的原则:德尔菲共识研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(23):7269-7276. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1985635. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Transforming research systems for meaningful engagement: a reflexive thematic analysis of spinal cord injury researchers' barriers and facilitators to using the integrated knowledge translation guiding principles.转化研究系统以实现有意义的参与:对脊髓损伤研究人员使用综合知识转化指导原则的障碍和促进因素的反思性主题分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Nov;46(23):5545-5553. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2310171. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
Supporting meaningful research partnerships: an interview study applying behavior change theory to develop relevant recommendations for researchers.支持有意义的研究合作关系:一项应用行为改变理论的访谈研究,为研究人员提出相关建议。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Nov 5;13(11):833-844. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad040.
5
Theory- and evidence-based best practices for physical activity counseling for adults with spinal cord injury.理论和循证最佳实践为成人脊髓损伤的身体活动咨询。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Jul;47(4):584-596. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2169062. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
6
A case study of using community-based consensus methods to facilitate shared decision-making among a spinal cord injury network.一项关于运用基于社区的共识方法促进脊髓损伤网络中共同决策的案例研究。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Feb 16;5:1335467. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1335467. eCollection 2024.
7
Systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury and related health conditions: A scoping review.从关于脊髓损伤及相关健康状况的卫生研究中确定的伙伴关系原则和策略的系统综述:一项范围综述。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2023 Jul;46(4):614-631. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2033578. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
8
IKT Guiding Principles: demonstration of diffusion and dissemination in partnership.IKT指导原则:合作伙伴关系中传播与扩散的示范
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 12;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00462-1.
9
How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field.综合知识转化(IKT)与其他协作研究方法在生成和转化知识方面有何不同?向该领域的专家学习。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Mar 30;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6.
10
Translating the international scientific spinal cord injury exercise guidelines into community and clinical practice guidelines: a Canadian evidence-informed resource.将国际科学脊髓损伤运动指南转化为社区和临床实践指南:加拿大循证资源。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Jun;58(6):647-657. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0410-1. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The feasibility and effect of a peer-facilitated, remote handcycling sport program for aging adults with spinal cord injury or disease: a mixed methods case series.一项由同伴协助的针对脊髓损伤或疾病老年患者的远程手摇车运动项目的可行性及效果:一项混合方法病例系列研究
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2025 Sep 10;11(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41394-025-00721-1.
2
Establishing best practices guidelines for collaborative research in global surgery: developing a Delphi survey.制定全球外科合作研究的最佳实践指南:开展德尔菲调查。
J Glob Health. 2025 Sep 5;15:04237. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04237.
3
Professionals' Perceptions on Implementing an Adapted Lifestyle Coaching Program for People with Physical Disabilities.
专业人士对为身体残疾者实施适应性生活方式指导计划的看法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;13(16):1978. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161978.
4
Engagement of People With Lived Experience in Spinal Cord Injury to Address Innovation Priorities.让脊髓损伤患者参与进来以确定创新重点。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70369. doi: 10.1111/hex.70369.
5
Challenges and strategies for spinal cord injury research recruitment in rehabilitation hospitals: a single center perspective.康复医院脊髓损伤研究招募的挑战与策略:单中心视角
Spinal Cord. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1038/s41393-025-01094-w.
6
"The questions made me realize how many times I could have been saved and removed from that situation": The experiences of patients attended to by paramedics for intimate partner violence, and actionable implementations for paramedicine.“这些问题让我意识到,在那种情况下,我本可以被救出来多少次”:护理人员照料的亲密伴侣暴力患者的经历,以及护理医学的可行实施方案。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 May 26;25(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03753-9.
7
Identifying what matters to adults with mobility limitations regarding their experiences with medications: A concept mapping study.确定行动不便的成年人在用药经历方面关注的事项:一项概念图研究。
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0323877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323877. eCollection 2025.
8
Partnered health research in Canada: a cross-sectional survey of perceptions among researchers and knowledge users involved in funded projects between 2011 and 2019.加拿大的合作健康研究:对2011年至2019年间参与资助项目的研究人员和知识使用者认知的横断面调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 3;23(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01299-8.
9
Editorial: Co-design of rehabilitation programming.社论:康复计划的共同设计
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Jan 6;5:1537063. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1537063. eCollection 2024.
10
Exploring perspectives of type 2 diabetes prevention program coaches and training delivery staff on e-learning training: a qualitative study.探索2型糖尿病预防项目教练和培训工作人员对电子学习培训的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1469. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06437-4.