• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从关于脊髓损伤及相关健康状况的卫生研究中确定的伙伴关系原则和策略的系统综述:一项范围综述。

Systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury and related health conditions: A scoping review.

作者信息

Hoekstra Femke, Trigo Francisca, Sibley Kathryn M, Graham Ian D, Kennefick Michael, Mrklas Kelly J, Nguyen Tram, Vis-Dunbar Mathew, Gainforth Heather L

机构信息

School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.

International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2023 Jul;46(4):614-631. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2033578. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1080/10790268.2022.2033578
PMID:35262473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10274560/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and provide systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury (SCI) and related health conditions.

METHODS

Four health electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were searched from inception to March 2019. We included articles that described, reflected, and/or evaluated one or more collaborative research activities in health research about SCI, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, amputation, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, acquired brain injury, or wheelchair-users. Partnership principles (i.e. norms or values) and strategies (i.e. observable actions) were extracted and analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

We included 39 articles about SCI (n = 13), stroke (n = 15), multiple sclerosis (n = 5), amputation (n = 2), cerebral palsy (n = 2), Parkinson's disease (n = 1), and wheelchair users (n = 1). We extracted 110 principles and synthesized them into 13 overarching principles. Principles related to building and maintaining relationships between researchers and research users were most frequently reported. We identified 32 strategies that could be applied at various phases of the research process and 26 strategies that were specific to a research phase (planning, conduct, or dissemination).

CONCLUSION

We provided systematic overviews of principles and strategies for research partnerships. These could be used by researchers and research users who want to work in partnership to plan, conduct and/or disseminate their SCI research. The findings informed the development of the new SCI Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles (www.iktprinciples.com) and will support the implementation of these Principles within the SCI research system.

摘要

研究设计

范围综述。

目的

识别并系统概述从关于脊髓损伤(SCI)及相关健康状况的健康研究中确定的合作原则和策略。

方法

检索了四个健康电子数据库(Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO),检索时间从建库至2019年3月。我们纳入了描述、反映和/或评估了关于SCI、中风、多发性硬化症、帕金森病、截肢、脑瘫、脊柱裂、肌萎缩侧索硬化症、获得性脑损伤或轮椅使用者的健康研究中的一项或多项合作研究活动的文章。使用定向定性内容分析法提取并分析合作原则(即规范或价值观)和策略(即可观察到的行动)。

结果

我们纳入了39篇关于SCI(n = 13)、中风(n = 15)、多发性硬化症(n = 5)、截肢(n = 2)、脑瘫(n = 2)、帕金森病(n = 1)和轮椅使用者(n = 1)的文章。我们提取了110条原则并将其综合为13条总体原则。与建立和维持研究人员与研究使用者之间关系相关的原则被报道得最为频繁。我们确定了32条可应用于研究过程各个阶段的策略以及26条特定于某个研究阶段(规划、实施或传播)的策略。

结论

我们提供了研究合作的原则和策略的系统概述。这些可被希望合作开展、实施和/或传播其SCI研究的研究人员和研究使用者所采用。这些发现为新的SCI综合知识转化指导原则(www.iktprinciples.com)的制定提供了参考,并将支持这些原则在SCI研究系统中的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f94/10274560/fa91ec06518c/YSCM_A_2033578_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f94/10274560/fa91ec06518c/YSCM_A_2033578_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f94/10274560/fa91ec06518c/YSCM_A_2033578_F0001_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury and related health conditions: A scoping review.从关于脊髓损伤及相关健康状况的卫生研究中确定的伙伴关系原则和策略的系统综述:一项范围综述。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2023 Jul;46(4):614-631. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2033578. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Principles to guide spinal cord injury research partnerships: a Delphi consensus study.指导脊髓损伤研究合作的原则:德尔菲共识研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(23):7269-7276. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1985635. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Transforming research systems for meaningful engagement: a reflexive thematic analysis of spinal cord injury researchers' barriers and facilitators to using the integrated knowledge translation guiding principles.转化研究系统以实现有意义的参与:对脊髓损伤研究人员使用综合知识转化指导原则的障碍和促进因素的反思性主题分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Nov;46(23):5545-5553. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2310171. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
5
Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.在合作中进行和传播脊髓损伤研究的综合知识转化指导原则。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Researchers' and Research Users' Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study.研究人员和研究使用者在脊髓损伤研究伙伴关系中的合作经验和原因:一项定性研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1401-1412. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.35. Epub 2021 May 11.
7
Falls among full-time wheelchair users with spinal cord injury and multiple sclerosis: a comparison of characteristics of fallers and circumstances of falls.脊髓损伤和多发性硬化症患者中全职轮椅使用者的跌倒情况:跌倒者特征和跌倒情况的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Feb;41(4):389-395. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1393111. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
8
Physical Activity and the Health of Wheelchair Users: A Systematic Review in Multiple Sclerosis, Cerebral Palsy, and Spinal Cord Injury.身体活动与轮椅使用者的健康:多发性硬化症、脑瘫和脊髓损伤的系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec;102(12):2464-2481.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Supporting meaningful research partnerships: an interview study applying behavior change theory to develop relevant recommendations for researchers.支持有意义的研究合作关系:一项应用行为改变理论的访谈研究,为研究人员提出相关建议。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Nov 5;13(11):833-844. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad040.

引用本文的文献

1
'There has to be some chemistry there': an interpretive description exploring the experiences, motivations and dynamics of partnered child health research.“那里必须存在某种化学反应”:一项探索合作儿童健康研究的经历、动机和动态的诠释性描述
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 29;11(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00777-1.
2
How are patient partners involved in health service research? A scoping review of reviews.患者合作伙伴如何参与卫生服务研究?一项综述的范围界定综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 8;11(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00755-7.
3
Challenges and Facilitators to Patient and Public Involvement In Stroke Research: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Researchers' and Research Users' Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study.研究人员和研究使用者在脊髓损伤研究伙伴关系中的合作经验和原因:一项定性研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1401-1412. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.35. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Guiding principles for quality, ethical standards and ongoing learning in implementation research: multicountry learnings from participatory action research to strengthen health systems.实施研究中的质量、道德标准及持续学习指导原则:参与式行动研究的多国经验以强化卫生系统
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Nov 1;35(Supplement_2):ii137-ii149. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa123.
3
中风研究中患者及公众参与的挑战与促进因素:一项定性研究方案
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70231. doi: 10.1111/hex.70231.
4
Total and Free Zinc Dynamics as Biomarkers for Neurological Impairment in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.总锌和游离锌动力学作为创伤性脊髓损伤神经功能损害的生物标志物
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 29;17(3):496. doi: 10.3390/nu17030496.
5
Stroke patient and stakeholder engagement (SPSE): concepts, definitions, models, implementation strategies, indicators, and frameworks-a systematic scoping review.卒中患者和利益相关者参与(SPSE):概念、定义、模型、实施策略、指标和框架——系统范围界定综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;13(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02686-y.
6
Using mixed methods and partnership to develop a program evaluation toolkit for organizations that provide physical activity programs for persons with disabilities.运用混合方法和合作关系,为向残疾人提供体育活动项目的组织开发一个项目评估工具包。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 2;10(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00618-7.
7
Identifying strategies and related principles supporting a co-design approach in an assistive device service delivery and research platform.确定在辅助设备服务提供和研究平台中支持协同设计方法的策略及相关原则。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jul 23;5:1364016. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1364016. eCollection 2024.
8
Perspectives of researchers and clinicians on patient and public involvement (PPI) in preclinical spinal cord research: An interview study.研究者和临床医生对参与临床前脊髓研究的患者和公众的看法(PPI):一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13967. doi: 10.1111/hex.13967.
9
Developing a digital mind body medicine supportive care intervention for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using stakeholder engagement and design thinking.运用利益相关者参与和设计思维,为肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者开发一种数字身心医学支持性护理干预措施。
Digit Health. 2024 May 20;10:20552076241255928. doi: 10.1177/20552076241255928. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
A scoping review of the globally available tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts.全球可用的评估健康研究伙伴关系成果和影响的工具的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 22;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00958-y.
Are you really doing 'codesign'? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations.
你真的在做“共同设计”吗?在与弱势群体合作时的批判性反思。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e038339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038339.
4
Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.在合作中进行和传播脊髓损伤研究的综合知识转化指导原则。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
5
Applying an intersectionality lens to the theoretical domains framework: a tool for thinking about how intersecting social identities and structures of power influence behaviour.运用交叉性视角审视理论领域框架:一种思考交叉社会身份和权力结构如何影响行为的工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01056-1.
6
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
7
How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field.综合知识转化(IKT)与其他协作研究方法在生成和转化知识方面有何不同?向该领域的专家学习。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Mar 30;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6.
8
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.准备患者合作:患者伙伴参与和评估研究的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
10
Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review.长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系的成功:范围文献综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):556-568. doi: 10.1177/1090198119882989. Epub 2019 Oct 16.