Gołuchowska Agnieszka, Lipert Anna, Grzegorczyk Janina, Michalak Anna, Jegier Anna
Department of Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.
Department of Microbiology and Medical Laboratory Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2020 Oct 23;48(287):302-306.
Concentrations of selected lipoproteins are currently useful cardiovascular risk assessment indicators, especially in monitoring lipid-lowering therapy.
The aim was to evaluate the influence of 8-week mid-term CR on apolipoproteins: A-I, B, E and VLDL in CAD patients in relation to conventional lipid profile and prior coronary intervention: PCI or CABG.
93 male patients admitted to CR after PCI or CABG. At baseline and after CR, conventional lipid profile parameters and VLDL concentrations were evaluated. Apolipoproteins: A-I, B, E were also determined. Basic anthropometric indicators and measurements of hemodynamic and exercise tolerance at rest and peak workload in exercise testing (HR, sBP, dBP, DP, W) were measured.
After CR, depending on revasculazation intervention, no changes in HDL-C, LDL-C, TG and VLDL values were observed (p>0.05). Reduction in apoA-I was noted in PCI group (p=0.0254). No statistically significant changes in apoB and apoE were found in groups. Significant increase in apo B/apo A-I index was observed only in PCI group (p=0.0329). PCI and CABG patients did not differ in hemodynamic and exercise tolerance parameters, except sBP in rest and dBP at peak workload in exercise testing (p=0.014 and p=0.031). Regardless on type of intervention, there was observed statistically significant increase in Wpeak (p=0,0000 in both groups) and DPpeak (p=0.0000 in PCI-patients and p=0.0003 in CABGpatients) after CR.
CR has various effects on lipid concentrations. Indicators of conventional lipid profile and selected apolipoproteins are not optimal parameters allowing assessment of effectiveness of CR program in such a short time, this role is well fullfilled by the hemodynamic and physical exercise indices. Apo B/apo A-I ratio value suggests an increasing risk of IHD complications, especially in post- PCI group. CR program requires intensification of lipid-reducing therapy and education on lifestyle modification.
目前,特定脂蛋白的浓度是有用的心血管风险评估指标,尤其在监测降脂治疗方面。
本研究旨在评估为期8周的中期心脏康复(CR)对冠心病(CAD)患者载脂蛋白A-I、B、E及极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL)的影响,并与传统血脂谱及既往冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI或冠状动脉旁路移植术CABG)进行关联分析。
93例接受PCI或CABG治疗后进入心脏康复程序的男性患者。在基线期及心脏康复后,评估传统血脂谱参数及VLDL浓度。同时测定载脂蛋白A-I、B、E。测量基本人体测量指标以及静息和运动试验峰值负荷时的血流动力学和运动耐量(心率、收缩压、舒张压、脉压、运动负荷)。
心脏康复后,根据血运重建干预方式不同,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、甘油三酯(TG)及VLDL值均未发生变化(p>0.05)。PCI组载脂蛋白A-I降低(p=0.0254)。两组载脂蛋白B及载脂蛋白E未发现有统计学意义的变化。仅PCI组载脂蛋白B/载脂蛋白A-I指数显著升高(p=0.0329)。PCI组和CABG组患者在血流动力学和运动耐量参数方面无差异,但静息收缩压及运动试验峰值负荷时舒张压除外(p=0.014和p=0.031)。无论干预类型如何,心脏康复后两组运动试验峰值负荷(Wpeak)(两组p=0.0000)及峰值脉压(DPpeak)(PCI组患者p=0.0000,CABG组患者p=0.0003)均有统计学意义的升高。
心脏康复对血脂浓度有多种影响。传统血脂谱指标及特定载脂蛋白并非评估心脏康复计划在如此短时间内效果的最佳参数,血流动力学和体育锻炼指标能更好地发挥这一作用。载脂蛋白B/载脂蛋白A-I比值提示缺血性心脏病(IHD)并发症风险增加,尤其是PCI术后组。心脏康复计划需要强化降脂治疗及生活方式改变方面的教育。