Copenhagen Hepatitis C Program (CO-HEP), Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Viral Hepat. 2021 Feb;28(2):302-316. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13430. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have proven highly effective against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, some patients experience treatment failure, associated with resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). Our aim was to investigate the complete viral coding sequence in hepatitis C patients treated with DAAs to identify RASs and the effects of treatment on the viral population. We selected 22 HCV patients with sustained virologic response (SVR) to match 21 treatment-failure patients in relation to HCV genotype, DAA regimen, liver cirrhosis and previous treatment experience. Viral-titre data were compared between the two patient groups, and HCV full-length open reading frame deep-sequencing was performed. The proportion of HCV NS5A-RASs at baseline was higher in treatment-failure (82%) than matched SVR patients (25%) (p = .0063). Also, treatment failure was associated with slower declines in viraemia titres. Viral population diversity did not differ at baseline between SVR and treatment-failure patients, but failure was associated with decreased diversity probably caused by selection for RAS. The NS5B-substitution 150V was associated with sofosbuvir treatment failure in genotype 3a. Further, mutations identified in NS2, NS3-helicase and NS5A-domain-III were associated with DAA treatment failure in genotype 1a patients. Six retreated HCV patients (35%) experienced 2nd treatment failure; RASs were present in 67% compared to 11% with SVR. In conclusion, baseline RASs to NS5A inhibitors, but not virus population diversity, and lower viral titre decline predicted HCV treatment failure. Mutations outside of the DAA targets can be associated with DAA treatment failure. Successful DAA retreatment in patients with treatment failure was hampered by previously selected RASs.
直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)已被证明对慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染具有高度疗效。然而,一些患者会出现治疗失败的情况,这与耐药相关取代(RASs)有关。我们的目的是研究接受 DAA 治疗的丙型肝炎患者的完整病毒编码序列,以确定 RASs 以及治疗对病毒群体的影响。我们选择了 22 名持续病毒学应答(SVR)的 HCV 患者,与 21 名治疗失败的患者相匹配,比较两组患者的病毒载量数据,并对 HCV 全长开放阅读框进行深度测序。在基线时,治疗失败患者中 HCV NS5A-RASs 的比例(82%)高于匹配的 SVR 患者(25%)(p =.0063)。此外,治疗失败与病毒血症滴度下降较慢有关。在 SVR 和治疗失败患者之间,基线时病毒群体多样性没有差异,但失败与 RAS 选择导致的多样性降低有关。NS5B 取代 150V 与基因型 3a 中索非布韦治疗失败有关。此外,在基因型 1a 患者中,NS2、NS3-解旋酶和 NS5A 结构域-III 中鉴定的突变与 DAA 治疗失败有关。六名复治 HCV 患者(35%)经历了 2 次治疗失败;RASs 的存在率为 67%,而 SVR 为 11%。总之,基线时对 NS5A 抑制剂的 RASs,而不是病毒群体多样性和较低的病毒滴度下降,预测了 HCV 治疗失败。DAA 靶标以外的突变也可能与 DAA 治疗失败有关。在治疗失败的患者中,成功的 DAA 再治疗受到先前选择的 RASs 的阻碍。