Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa.
Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 21;375(1814):20190452. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0452. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
Whereas the anthropogenic impact on marine biodiversity is undebated, the quantification and prediction of this change are not trivial. Simple traditional measures of biodiversity (e.g. richness, diversity indices) do not capture the magnitude and direction of changes in species or functional composition. In this paper, we apply recently developed methods for measuring biodiversity turnover to time-series data of four broad taxonomic groups from two coastal regions: the southern North Sea (Germany) and the South African coast. Both areas share geomorphological features and ecosystem types, allowing for a critical assessment of the most informative metrics of biodiversity change across organism groups. We found little evidence for directional trends in univariate metrics of diversity for either the effective number of taxa or the amount of richness change. However, turnover in composition was high (on average nearly 30% of identities when addressing presence or absence of species) and even higher when taking the relative dominance of species into account. This turnover accumulated over time at similar rates across regions and organism groups. We conclude that biodiversity metrics responsive to turnover provide a more accurate reflection of community change relative to conventional metrics (absolute richness or relative abundance) and are spatially broadly applicable. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.
尽管人为因素对海洋生物多样性的影响是毋庸置疑的,但量化和预测这种变化并不简单。简单的传统生物多样性衡量标准(如丰富度、多样性指数)无法捕捉物种或功能组成的变化幅度和方向。在本文中,我们将最近开发的衡量生物多样性周转率的方法应用于来自两个沿海地区的四个广泛分类群的时间序列数据:北海南部(德国)和南非海岸。这两个地区具有相似的地貌特征和生态系统类型,因此可以对跨生物群体的最具信息量的生物多样性变化指标进行严格评估。我们发现,无论是有效分类单元数量还是丰富度变化的数量,单一变量多样性衡量标准都几乎没有方向性趋势的证据。然而,组成的周转率很高(当涉及到物种的存在或不存在时,平均接近 30%的身份),如果考虑到物种的相对优势,周转率甚至更高。这种周转率在不同地区和生物群体中以相似的速度随时间累积。我们的结论是,相对于传统的衡量标准(绝对丰富度或相对丰度),对周转率有反应的生物多样性衡量标准更能准确反映群落的变化,并且在空间上具有广泛的适用性。本文是“海洋保护的综合研究视角”主题特刊的一部分。