Suppr超能文献

[超声造影在周围神经挤压伤检测中的价值]

[Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Detection of Peripheral Nerve Crush Injury].

作者信息

Chen Siming, Zhu Yaqiong, Wang Yuexiang, Luo Yukun

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound,the First Medical Centre,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China.

Imaging and Nuclear Medicine,Medical College of Nankai University,Tianjin 300071,China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2020 Oct;42(5):640-645. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.12830.

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in the detection of peripheral nerve crush injury.Methods Thirty New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into normal control group and sciatic nerve crush injury group(which included 3-day,2-week,4-week,and 8-week groups after operation).The morphological structure and blood perfusion of the injured sciatic nerves were detected by high-frequency ultrasound,power Doppler ultrasound(PDUS),CEUS,and histopathology.Results Conventional ultrasound revealed that the internal diameter of nerves showed no significant difference between the 8-week group and the control group [(1.14±0.15)mm (0.92±0.11)mm;=4.72,=0.86].Analysis of nerve blood perfusion showed that PDUS had a high sensitivity in displaying fine blood flow signal inside the injured nerve in the acute stage of inflammation(3-day group)but not good enough in the 4-and 8-week groups.CEUS could clearly show the microcirculation perfusion in the 3-day,2-week,4-week,and 8-week groups,and analyses of the area under the curve,the peak time,and the peak intensity showed that the nerve blood perfusion increased significantly 3 days after operation and then decreased gradually.Histopathological examination showed that the median cumulative OD value was 12 035.6(10 566.3,14 805.8)8 weeks after operation,which was still significantly lower than that 18 784.8(15 904.5,21 103.5)in the normal control group(=6.10, =0.0003).Conclusions Conventional high-frequency ultrasound and PDUS can not adequately evaluate the microcirculation perfusion in different periods after nerve injury.CEUS can quantitatively evaluate the microvascular perfusion of injured nerve at any period and provide more information for indirect evaluation of nerve regeneration.

摘要

目的 探讨超声造影(CEUS)在周围神经挤压伤检测中的价值。方法 将30只新西兰白兔随机分为正常对照组和坐骨神经挤压伤组(包括术后3天、2周、4周和8周组)。采用高频超声、能量多普勒超声(PDUS)、CEUS及组织病理学方法检测损伤坐骨神经的形态结构和血流灌注。结果 常规超声显示,8周组与对照组神经内径差异无统计学意义[(1.14±0.15)mm比(0.92±0.11)mm;t = 4.72,P = 0.86]。神经血流灌注分析显示,PDUS对炎症急性期(3天组)损伤神经内部细微血流信号显示具有较高敏感性,但在4周和8周组显示效果欠佳。CEUS能清晰显示3天、2周、4周和8周组的微循环灌注,曲线下面积、达峰时间及峰值强度分析显示,术后3天神经血流灌注显著增加,随后逐渐下降。组织病理学检查显示,术后8周中位数累积OD值为12 035.6(10 566.3,14 805.8),仍显著低于正常对照组的18 784.8(15 904.5,21 103.5)(t = 6.10,P = 0.0003)。结论 常规高频超声和PDUS不能充分评估神经损伤后不同时期的微循环灌注。CEUS能定量评估损伤神经在任何时期的微血管灌注,为间接评估神经再生提供更多信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验