Henrion Audrey, Courtet Philippe, Arpon-Brand Véronique, Lafrancesca Audrey, Lacourt Laetitia, Jaussent Isabelle, Guillaume Sébastien, Olié Emilie, Ducasse Déborah
CHU Montpellier, Lapeyronie Hospital, Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Post Acute Care, CHRU Montpellier, France.
INSERM U1061, Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 30;11:500447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.500447. eCollection 2020.
Suicide prevention after a recent suicide attempt remains a major issue for clinicians. Indeed, these patients are at risk of new attempts and also less prone to interact with mental health services. As psychoeducation-based interventions are strongly recommended for patients with severe or chronic disorders and poor adherence, we developed the first French program of suicide psychoeducation (PEPSUI).
We started a large multicenter randomized controlled trial in outpatients who attempted suicide in the last year (i.e., current suicidal behavior disorder) to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a 10-week psychoeducational program (PEPSUI group: scientific information on suicidal behavior, and third-wave cognitive behavioral therapies) compared with a 10-week relaxation program (control condition), in a naturalistic setting. Here, we present the qualitative part of this study. Participants in both groups completed a narrative interview with questions on their general impressions about the therapy process and outcomes, specific areas of change in their life since inclusion, and knowledge and perceptions about suicide and mental health services. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded using inductive and deductive thematic analysis with a constant comparative approach. Participants were consecutively included until data saturation.
The interviews of 18 patients (n=10 in the PEPSUI group, and n=8 in the relaxation group) were analyzed. Qualitative analyses revealed some common points, and many differences between groups that are relevant for suicide prevention. Patients in both groups were satisfied with the programs. Group modality and therapeutic alliance with the instructors were considered useful in both groups. Participation was related to improved perception of mental health units (particularly in the PEPSUI group). Both groups reported the acquisition of stress management skills and distress tolerance. Relaxation was an easy way to survive stress. Conversely, the PEPSUI program had deeper implications for daily life through effective positioning towards internal events (thoughts and emotions) as a consequence of mindfulness-derived practices, enhancement of value-based commitments, improvement of the meaning in life and internal locus of control, increased contact with the present moment, use of a matrix (a decision-making tool), and acquisition of scientific knowledge on suicidal behavior.
Through specific processes for targeting suicidal risk and reducing the stigma, the PEPSUI program may represent a promising intervention for suicide prevention.
对于临床医生而言,预防近期有自杀未遂史者再次自杀仍是一个重大问题。事实上,这些患者有再次尝试自杀的风险,而且他们也不太愿意与心理健康服务机构接触。鉴于强烈推荐对患有严重或慢性疾病且依从性差的患者采用基于心理教育的干预措施,我们制定了首个法语自杀心理教育项目(PEPSUI)。
我们对去年有自杀未遂史的门诊患者(即当前存在自杀行为障碍者)开展了一项大型多中心随机对照试验,以评估一项为期10周的心理教育项目(PEPSUI组:关于自杀行为的科学信息以及第三波认知行为疗法)与一项为期10周的放松项目(对照条件)在自然环境中的可行性、可接受性和有效性。在此,我们展示本研究的定性部分。两组参与者都完成了一次叙述性访谈,访谈问题涉及他们对治疗过程和结果的总体印象、自纳入研究以来生活中具体的变化领域,以及对自杀和心理健康服务的认识与看法。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用归纳和演绎主题分析以及持续比较法进行编码。连续纳入参与者直至数据饱和。
对18名患者的访谈进行了分析(PEPSUI组10名,放松组8名)。定性分析揭示了一些共同点,以及两组之间在自杀预防方面的许多差异。两组患者对项目都很满意。两组都认为小组形式以及与指导者的治疗联盟很有用。参与与对精神科病房的看法改善有关(尤其是在PEPSUI组)。两组都报告获得了压力管理技能和痛苦耐受力。放松是应对压力的一种简单方式。相反,由于正念衍生实践对内部事件(思想和情绪)的有效定位、基于价值观承诺的增强、生活意义和内部控制点的改善、与当下接触的增加、使用矩阵(一种决策工具)以及获得关于自杀行为的科学知识,PEPSUI项目对日常生活有更深远的影响。
通过针对自杀风险和减少污名化的特定过程,PEPSUI项目可能是一种有前景的自杀预防干预措施。