• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Effect of Time Spent with a Dynamic Spacer on Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Two-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty.动态间隔器使用时间对两阶段翻修膝关节置换术临床及功能结果的影响
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Sep 2;54(6):824-830. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00247-8. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Factors Influencing the Clinical Outcomes of Two-Stage Re-Implantation in Patients With Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染患者二期再植入临床结局的影响因素
Cureus. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):e42566. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42566. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Static vs Articulating Spacers for Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Five-Year Review.两阶段翻修全膝关节置换术中静态与可动间隔器的比较:至少五年的回顾
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Jan 20;13:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.10.010. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Autoclaved metal-on-cement spacer versus static spacer in two-stage revision in periprosthetic knee infection.人工膝关节感染二期翻修中,经高压灭菌的金属对骨水泥间隔物与静态间隔物的比较
Indian J Orthop. 2016 Mar-Apr;50(2):146-53. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.177587.
5
Short-term Follow-up of Antibiotic-loaded Articulating Cement Spacers in Two-stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.感染性全膝关节置换二期翻修中抗生素骨水泥关节连接型间隔物的短期随访:病例系列研究
Orthop Surg. 2018 May;10(2):128-133. doi: 10.1111/os.12381. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Articulating Spacers as a Modified One-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Analysis.作为改良一期翻修全膝关节置换术的关节连接间隔器:初步分析
Surg Technol Int. 2018 Jun 1;32:239-248.
7
[Two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty using antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer].[使用含抗生素的可活动骨水泥间隔物对感染性全膝关节置换术进行两阶段翻修]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;26(10):1169-73.
8
Two-stage revision using a modified articulating spacer in infected total knee arthroplasty.在感染性全膝关节置换术中使用改良的活动式间隔器进行两阶段翻修术。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013 Dec;25(4):180-5. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.4.180. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
Predictors of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty following aseptic failure.无菌性失败后全膝关节置换翻修术后功能结局的预测因素。
Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):264-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
10
[The mid-term follow-up of revision total knee athroplasty].[全膝关节置换翻修术的中期随访]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Oct 1;53(10):757-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of recent advances in the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty part 2: single-stage or two-stage surgical technique?全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的诊断和治疗新进展述评 第 2 部分:单阶段还是双阶段手术技术?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 12;19(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05152-6.
2
A Modified Technique for Two-Stage Revision in Knee PJI Treatment.膝关节假体周围感染治疗中两阶段翻修的改良技术
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 26;12(23):7323. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237323.
3
Interval between two-stage exchanges: what is optimal and how do you know?两阶段翻修之间的间隔时间:最佳间隔是多久以及如何确定?
Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul 5;5(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00185-4.
4
Are Static Spacers Superior to Articulated Spacers in the Staged Treatment of Infected Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在感染性初次膝关节置换分期治疗中,静态间隔物是否优于活动间隔物?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 18;11(16):4854. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164854.
5
Comparison of dynamic and static spacers for the treatment of infections following total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较全膝关节置换术后感染治疗中动态和静态间隔物的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jul 15;17(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03238-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Two-Stage Treatment for Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection Utilizing an Articulating Prefabricated Antibiotic Spacer.采用可活动预制抗生素 spacer 的全膝关节置换术感染的两阶段治疗。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3S):S57-S62. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.049.
2
Epidemiology and microbiology of prosthetic joint infections: a nine-year, single-center experience in Pavia, Northern Italy.意大利北部帕维亚地区 9 年单中心假体关节感染的流行病学和微生物学研究
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Aug;105(2):195-200. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00638-y. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
3
Difficult to treat: are there organism-dependent differences and overall risk factors in success rates for two-stage knee revision?治疗困难:两阶段膝关节翻修的成功率是否存在与生物体相关的差异和总体风险因素?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1595-1602. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03335-4. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Outcome of single-stage versus two-stage exchange for revision knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic infection.单阶段与两阶段翻修术治疗慢性人工关节周围感染的膝关节置换术的结果
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Aug 2;4(8):495-502. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190003. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook.人工关节周围感染:当前概念与展望
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jul 29;4(7):482-494. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores.膝关节学会评分的最小临床重要差异和显著临床获益。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1473-1478. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05543-x. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Two-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in 245 Knees without Prior Treatment for Infection.245 例初次全膝关节置换术后无感染前期治疗的假体周围关节感染的两阶段置换协议。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):239-249. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00356.
8
Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Update on What to Expect.培养阴性假体周围关节感染:最新情况及预期
JB JS Open Access. 2018 Jul 12;3(3):e0060. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00060. eCollection 2018 Sep 25.
9
Economic Impact of Prosthetic Joint Infection - an Evaluation Within the Portuguese National Health System.人工关节感染的经济影响——葡萄牙国家卫生系统内的一项评估
J Bone Jt Infect. 2018 Sep 8;3(4):197-202. doi: 10.7150/jbji.28508. eCollection 2018.
10
The proper timing of second-stage revision in treating periprosthetic knee infection: reliable indicators and risk factors.人工膝关节周围感染二期翻修的恰当时机:可靠指标与危险因素
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Aug 29;13(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0885-z.

动态间隔器使用时间对两阶段翻修膝关节置换术临床及功能结果的影响

The Effect of Time Spent with a Dynamic Spacer on Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Two-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Golgelioglu Fatih, Oguzkaya Sinan, Misir Abdulhamit, Guney Ahmet

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tunceli State Hospital, Cumhuriyet Mah., Tunceli-Elazığ karayolu Merkez, 62000 Tunceli, Turkey.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sarkısla State Hospital, Yıldırım Mahallesi No: 27, Şarkışla, 58400 Sivas, Turkey.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2020 Sep 2;54(6):824-830. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00247-8. eCollection 2020 Nov.

DOI:10.1007/s43465-020-00247-8
PMID:33133405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7572906/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of a longer interval between the first and second stages of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision on the clinical and functional outcome.

METHODS

This study included a total of 56 patients who underwent two-stage revision TKA with a dynamic spacer with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Patients were categorized into two groups according to time with the spacer: < 3 months (Group 1, 31 patients) or > 3 months (Group 2, 25 patients). Clinical outcome and quality of life were assessed by knee range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score for Knee (KSS-K), Knee Society Score for Function (KSS-F) and Short Form 36 (SF-36).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 48 ± 19.1 months (range, 24-84 months). The KSS-K, KSS-F, and ROM values were significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 ( < 0.05). The SF-36 scores for general health, physical function, and bodily pain were significantly higher in Group 1 ( < 0.05). Re-infection occurred in 10 patients (17.8%). Time with spacer was not associated with re-infection development (Group 1,  = 6, 19% vs. Group 2,  = 4, 16%;  > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Increased duration with a spacer is associated with poorer clinical and functional outcomes as well as higher treatment costs in two-stage revision knee arthroplasty. Surgeons can attempt to reduce the time patients spend in a spacer to obtain better postoperative functional outcomes, as well as a better quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估感染性全膝关节置换术(TKA)翻修术第一阶段和第二阶段之间较长间隔时间对临床和功能结局的影响。

方法

本研究共纳入56例行两阶段翻修TKA并使用动态间隔器且随访至少2年的患者。根据使用间隔器的时间将患者分为两组:<3个月(第1组,31例患者)或>3个月(第2组,25例患者)。通过膝关节活动范围(ROM)、膝关节协会膝关节评分(KSS-K)、膝关节协会功能评分(KSS-F)和简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)评估临床结局和生活质量。

结果

平均随访期为48±19.1个月(范围24 - 84个月)。第1组的KSS-K、KSS-F和ROM值显著高于第2组(<0.05)。第1组的SF-36总体健康、身体功能和身体疼痛评分显著更高(<0.05)。10例患者(17.8%)发生再次感染。使用间隔器的时间与再次感染的发生无关(第1组,=6,19% vs.第2组,=4,16%;>0.05)。

结论

在两阶段翻修膝关节置换术中,延长使用间隔器的时间与较差的临床和功能结局以及更高的治疗成本相关。外科医生可尝试减少患者使用间隔器的时间,以获得更好的术后功能结局和更高的生活质量。

证据水平

3级。