Margonato Davide, Mazzetti Simone, De Maria Renata, Gorini Marco, Iacoviello Massimo, Maggioni Aldo P, Mortara Andrea
Department of Clinical Cardiology, Policlinico di Monza Monza, Italy.
Department of Cardiology, University of Pavia Pavia, Italy.
Card Fail Rev. 2020 Oct 16;6:e28. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2020.13. eCollection 2020 Mar.
The recent definition of an intermediate clinical phenotype of heart failure (HF) based on an ejection fraction (EF) of between 40% and 49%, namely HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), has fuelled investigations into the clinical profile and prognosis of this patient group. HFmrEF shares common clinical features with other HF phenotypes, such as a high prevalence of ischaemic aetiology, as in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), or hypertension and diabetes, as in HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), and benefits from the cornerstone drugs indicated for HFrEF. Among the HF phenotypes, HFmrEF is characterised by the highest rate of transition to either recovery or worsening of the severe systolic dysfunction profile that is the target of disease-modifying therapies, with opposite prognostic implications. This article focuses on the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and therapeutic approaches for HFmrEF, and discusses the major determinants of transition to HFpEF or HFrEF.
近期基于射血分数(EF)在40%至49%之间对心力衰竭(HF)中间临床表型的定义,即射血分数中等范围的心力衰竭(HFmrEF),推动了对该患者群体临床特征和预后的研究。HFmrEF与其他HF表型具有共同的临床特征,如缺血性病因的高患病率,如同射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF),或高血压和糖尿病,如同射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF),并且受益于适用于HFrEF的基石药物。在HF表型中,HFmrEF的特征是向疾病改善治疗目标的严重收缩功能障碍状态恢复或恶化转变的发生率最高,具有相反的预后意义。本文重点关注HFmrEF的流行病学、临床特征和治疗方法,并讨论向HFpEF或HFrEF转变的主要决定因素。