• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桡骨头半脱位复位中旋前与旋后-屈曲的比较:一项随机对照试验

Hyperpronation versus Supination-Flexion in Radial Head Subluxation Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Porozan Samaneh, Forouzan Arash, Hassanzadeh Rayeheh

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2020 Dec;9(4):256-260. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709703. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1709703
PMID:33133740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588296/
Abstract

Radial head subluxation (RHS) is the most common upper extremity injury in children. Supination-flexion (SF) and hyperpronation (HP) are two methods for reducing this subluxation. This study purposed to compare the success rates of two methods of reduction and also to determine which technique would be less painful. In total, 154 patients with RHS were enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups. Patients were to undergo reduction by one of the two methods; if the primary attempt was unsuccessful, a second attempt was performed using the alternate technique. In the case of failure of the second attempt, the first reduction technique was repeated. The success rates and pain levels before and after successful reduction were recorded. On the first attempt, 72 of 77 patients who underwent HP had a successful reduction. Four patients in the HP group had a successful reduction on the second attempt. In the SF group, 76 of 77 patients had a successful reduction on the first attempt. The success rate on first attempts was higher in the SF group than in the HP group (  = 0.043). Pain levels before and after reduction were not statistically different between the groups (  > 0.05). The SF technique had a higher success rate at first attempt to reduce RHS, but pain levels were similar in both methods.

摘要

桡骨头半脱位(RHS)是儿童最常见的上肢损伤。旋后-屈曲(SF)和旋前过度(HP)是两种复位这种半脱位的方法。本研究旨在比较两种复位方法的成功率,并确定哪种技术疼痛程度更低。本研究共纳入154例RHS患者,并随机分为两组。患者采用两种方法之一进行复位;如果初次尝试不成功,则使用另一种技术进行第二次尝试。如果第二次尝试失败,则重复第一次复位技术。记录成功复位前后的成功率和疼痛程度。在第一次尝试时,77例接受HP复位的患者中有72例成功复位。HP组有4例患者在第二次尝试时成功复位。在SF组,77例患者中有76例在第一次尝试时成功复位。SF组首次尝试的成功率高于HP组(P = 0.043)。两组复位前后的疼痛程度无统计学差异(P>0.05)。SF技术在首次尝试复位RHS时成功率更高,但两种方法的疼痛程度相似。

相似文献

1
Hyperpronation versus Supination-Flexion in Radial Head Subluxation Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.桡骨头半脱位复位中旋前与旋后-屈曲的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2020 Dec;9(4):256-260. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709703. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
A comparison of supination/flexion to hyperpronation in the reduction of radial head subluxations.旋后/屈曲与旋前过度在桡骨头半脱位复位中的比较。
Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1):e10. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.1.e10.
3
Pronation versus supination maneuvers for the reduction of 'pulled elbow': a randomized clinical trial.旋前与旋后手法复位治疗“牵拉肘”:一项随机临床试验
Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(3):135-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32831d796a.
4
Comparison of success and pain levels of supination-flexion and hyperpronation maneuvers in childhood nursemaid's elbow cases.对比儿童桡骨小头半脱位中旋前-旋后手法和过度旋前手法的成功率和疼痛程度。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;31(7):1078-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 20.
5
Randomized comparison of pain perception during radial head subluxation reduction using supination-flexion or forced pronation.采用旋后-屈曲法或强制旋前法复位桡骨头半脱位时疼痛感知的随机对照比较。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Apr;22(4):235-8. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000210172.17892.a1.
6
Comparison of hyperpronation and supination-flexion techniques in children presented to emergency department with painful pronation.对因旋前疼痛而到急诊科就诊的儿童进行旋前过度和旋后-屈曲技术的比较。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Mar-Apr;17(2):201-4. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.127557.
7
Nursemaid's Elbow - Supination-flexion Technique Versus Hyperpronation/forced Pronation: Randomized Clinical Study.保姆肘 - 旋后 - 屈曲技术与过度旋前/强制旋前:随机临床研究
Indian J Orthop. 2019 Jan-Feb;53(1):117-121. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_442_17.
8
Effectiveness of reduction maneuvers in the treatment of nursemaid's elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis.复位手法治疗桡骨小头半脱位的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.059. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
9
Radial head subluxation: comparing two methods of reduction.桡骨头半脱位:两种复位方法的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jul;6(7):715-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00440.x.
10
Efficacy of reduction maneuvers for "pulled elbow" in children: a prospective study of 115 cases.儿童“牵拉肘”复位手法的疗效:115例前瞻性研究
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Jun;34(4):432-6. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000130.

引用本文的文献

1
Finding the optimal treatment model: a systematic review and meta- analysis of manipulative interventions following failed initial treatment of radial head subluxation in children.寻找最佳治疗模式:一项针对儿童桡骨头半脱位初始治疗失败后手法干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 26;25(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08089-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursemaid's Elbow - Supination-flexion Technique Versus Hyperpronation/forced Pronation: Randomized Clinical Study.保姆肘 - 旋后 - 屈曲技术与过度旋前/强制旋前:随机临床研究
Indian J Orthop. 2019 Jan-Feb;53(1):117-121. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_442_17.
2
The Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.FLACC 量表用于评估操作疼痛的心理测量特性。
J Pain. 2018 Aug;19(8):862-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
Manipulative interventions for reducing pulled elbow in young children.用于减少幼儿牵拉肘的手法干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):CD007759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007759.pub4.
4
Radial Head Subluxation Among Young Children in the United States Associated With Consumer Products and Recreational Activities.美国幼儿桡骨头半脱位与消费品及娱乐活动的关联
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Jul;56(8):707-715. doi: 10.1177/0009922816672451. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
5
Pulled/nursemaid's elbow.牵拉肘/保姆肘
Malays Fam Physician. 2017 Apr 30;12(1):26-28. eCollection 2017.
6
Effectiveness of reduction maneuvers in the treatment of nursemaid's elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis.复位手法治疗桡骨小头半脱位的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.059. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Epidemiology of nursemaid's elbow.桡骨头半脱位的流行病学。
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;15(4):554-7. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.1.20813.
8
Comparison of hyperpronation and supination-flexion techniques in children presented to emergency department with painful pronation.对因旋前疼痛而到急诊科就诊的儿童进行旋前过度和旋后-屈曲技术的比较。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Mar-Apr;17(2):201-4. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.127557.
9
Efficacy of reduction maneuvers for "pulled elbow" in children: a prospective study of 115 cases.儿童“牵拉肘”复位手法的疗效:115例前瞻性研究
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Jun;34(4):432-6. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000130.
10
Comparison of success and pain levels of supination-flexion and hyperpronation maneuvers in childhood nursemaid's elbow cases.对比儿童桡骨小头半脱位中旋前-旋后手法和过度旋前手法的成功率和疼痛程度。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;31(7):1078-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 20.