Simiola Vanessa, Ellis Amy E, Thompson Richard, Schnurr Paula P, Cook Joan M
Kaiser Permanente, Center for Health Research, Hawaii.
Carlos Albizu University.
Pract Innov (Wash D C). 2019;4(3):194-203. doi: 10.1037/pri0000091.
As part of a longitudinal mixed-methods investigation on implementation of two evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, 164 mental health providers from 38 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) residential treatment programs across the U.S. were asked questions about their decision-making for using Prolonged Exposure and Cognitive Processing Therapy. Many providers viewed both EBPs as equally efficacious and encouraged veterans to decide for themselves which treatment they wished to engage in. Some providers said that it was hard to know which EBP would be the most effective for a given patient, and that occasionally they started work with a veteran thinking that a particular EBP would work and were surprised when the veteran did not receive the full potential benefit of the intervention. Other providers noted that their decision-making regarding which EBP to use depended on the type and nature of the veterans' index trauma, memory of the trauma, and traumatic stress symptoms (e.g., fear versus guilt). Additional factors that impacted the choice of EBP included whether the patient already had one of the treatments before or if a provider deemed one as more compatible with their previous training. Implications for clinical practice as well as the design and improvement of training and implementation efforts are discussed.
作为一项关于两种循证心理疗法(EBP)用于创伤后应激障碍实施情况的纵向混合方法调查的一部分,来自美国38个退伍军人事务部(VA)住院治疗项目的164名心理健康服务提供者被问及他们在使用延长暴露疗法和认知加工疗法时的决策情况。许多提供者认为这两种循证心理疗法同样有效,并鼓励退伍军人自己决定他们希望接受哪种治疗。一些提供者表示,很难知道哪种循证心理疗法对某个特定患者最有效,而且有时他们开始为退伍军人治疗时认为某种特定的循证心理疗法会有效,但当退伍军人没有从干预中获得全部潜在益处时,他们会感到惊讶。其他提供者指出,他们关于使用哪种循证心理疗法的决策取决于退伍军人索引创伤的类型和性质、对创伤的记忆以及创伤应激症状(例如,恐惧与内疚)。影响循证心理疗法选择的其他因素包括患者以前是否已经接受过其中一种治疗,或者提供者是否认为其中一种与他们以前的培训更兼容。文中还讨论了对临床实践以及培训和实施工作的设计与改进的启示。