Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0276111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276111. eCollection 2022.
To compare a Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) treatment (Cognitive Processing Therapy; CPT), an Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) treatment (Relapse Prevention; RP), and assessment-only (AO) for those meeting diagnostic criteria for both PTSD and AUD.
Participants with current PTSD/AUD (N = 101; mean age = 42.10; 56% female) were initially randomized to CPT, RP, or AO and assessed post-treatment or 6-weeks post-randomization (AO). AO participants were then re-randomized to CPT or RP. Follow-ups were at immediate post-treatment, 3-, and 12-months. Mixed effects intent-to-treat models compared conditions on changes in PTSD symptom severity, drinking days, and heavy drinking days.
At post-treatment, participants assigned to CPT showed significantly greater improvement than those in AO on PTSD symptom severity (b = -9.72, 95% CI [-16.20, -3.23], d = 1.22); the RP and AO groups did not differ significantly on PTSD. Both active treatment conditions significantly decreased heavy drinking days relative to AO (CPT vs. AO: Count Ratio [CR] = 0.51, 95% CI [0.30, 0.88]; RP vs. AO: CR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.19, 0.59]). After re-randomization both treatment conditions showed substantial improvements in PTSD symptoms and drinking between pre-treatment and post-treatment over the 12-month follow-up period, with RP showing an advantage on heavy drinking days.
Treatments targeting one or the other aspects of the PTSD/AUD comorbidity may have salutary effects on both PTSD and drinking outcomes. These preliminary results suggest that people with this comorbidity may have viable treatment options whether they present for mental health or addiction care.
The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01663337).
比较创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗(认知加工疗法;CPT)、酒精使用障碍(AUD)治疗(复发预防;RP)和仅评估(AO)对符合 PTSD 和 AUD 诊断标准的患者的疗效。
纳入当前患有 PTSD/AUD 的参与者(N=101;平均年龄=42.10;56%为女性),他们最初随机分配到 CPT、RP 或 AO,并在治疗后或 6 周后(AO)进行评估。AO 组的参与者随后重新随机分配到 CPT 或 RP。随访时间为治疗后即刻、3 个月和 12 个月。混合效应意向治疗模型比较了条件对 PTSD 症状严重程度、饮酒天数和重度饮酒天数的变化。
治疗后,与 AO 相比,CPT 组的 PTSD 症状严重程度显著改善(b=-9.72,95%置信区间[-16.20,-3.23],d=1.22);RP 和 AO 组之间的 PTSD 无显著差异。与 AO 相比,两种活性治疗方法均显著减少了重度饮酒天数(CPT 与 AO:计数比[CR]=0.51,95%置信区间[0.30,0.88];RP 与 AO:CR=0.34,95%置信区间[0.19,0.59])。重新随机分组后,两种治疗方法在 12 个月的随访期间,与治疗前相比,在 PTSD 症状和饮酒方面都有显著改善,RP 在重度饮酒天数方面表现出优势。
针对 PTSD/AUD 共病的一个或另一个方面的治疗可能对 PTSD 和饮酒结果都有有益的影响。这些初步结果表明,患有这种共病的人可能有可行的治疗选择,无论他们是为心理健康还是成瘾治疗而来。
该试验在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT01663337)。