Department of Clinical Psychology, Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University-New Brunswick.
Department of Psychology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Psychol Bull. 2024 Mar;150(3):319-353. doi: 10.1037/bul0000409. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analyses (NMA) of psychotherapy and pharmacologic treatments for individuals with co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol or other drug use disorder (AOD). A comprehensive search spanning 1995-2019 yielded a pool of 39 studies for systematic review, including 24 randomized controlled trials for the NMA. Study interventions were grouped by target of treatment (PTSD + AOD, PTSD-only, and AOD-only) and approach (psychotherapy or medication). Standardized mean differences (SMD) from the NMA yielded evidence that at the end of treatment, integrated, trauma-focused therapy for PTSD + AOD was more effective at reducing PTSD symptoms than integrated, non-trauma-focused therapy (SMD = -0.30), AOD-focused psychotherapy (SMD = -0.29), and other control psychotherapies (SMD = -0.43). End-of-treatment alcohol use severity was less for AOD medication compared to placebo medication (SMD = -0.36) and trauma-focused therapy for PTSD + placebo medication (SMD = -0.67), and less for trauma-focused psychotherapy + AOD medication compared to PTSD medication (SMD = -0.53), placebo medication (SMD = -0.50), and trauma-focused psychotherapy + placebo medication (SMD = -0.81). Key limitations include the small number of studies in the NMA for pharmacologic treatments and the lack of demographic diversity apparent in the existing literature. Findings suggest room for new studies that can address limitations in study sample composition, sample sizes, retention, and apply new techniques for conducting comparative effectiveness in PTSD + AOD treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
我们对同时患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和酒精或其他药物使用障碍(AOD)的个体的心理治疗和药物治疗进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。1995 年至 2019 年的全面搜索产生了 39 项系统评价研究,其中包括 24 项随机对照试验进行 NMA。研究干预措施按治疗目标(PTSD+AOD、PTSD 仅和 AOD 仅)和方法(心理治疗或药物治疗)进行分组。NMA 的标准化均数差(SMD)表明,在治疗结束时,针对 PTSD+AOD 的综合、以创伤为重点的治疗在降低 PTSD 症状方面比综合、非以创伤为重点的治疗(SMD=-0.30)、针对 AOD 的心理治疗(SMD=-0.29)和其他对照心理治疗(SMD=-0.43)更有效。与安慰剂药物治疗相比,AOD 药物治疗在治疗结束时的酒精使用严重程度较低(SMD=-0.36),与 PTSD+安慰剂药物治疗相比(SMD=-0.67),创伤聚焦治疗结束时的酒精使用严重程度也较低,与 PTSD 药物治疗相比(SMD=-0.53)、安慰剂药物治疗(SMD=-0.50)和创伤聚焦心理治疗+安慰剂药物治疗(SMD=-0.81)。主要限制包括 NMA 中药物治疗研究的数量较少,以及现有文献中明显缺乏人口统计学多样性。研究结果表明,有新的研究空间,可以解决研究样本组成、样本量、保留率方面的局限性,并为 PTSD+AOD 治疗的比较有效性应用新技术。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。