双动全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折。

Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1457-1466. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0610.R2.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the rate of dislocation following dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, and to compare rates of dislocation, surgical-site infection, reoperation, and one-year mortality between DM-THA and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA).

METHODS

Studies were selected based on the following criteria: 1) study design (retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, retrospective comparative studies, prospective comparative studies, and randomized controlled studies (RCTs)); 2) study population (patients with femoral neck fracture); 3) intervention (DM-THA or BHA); and 4) outcomes (complications during postoperative follow-up and clinical results). Pooled meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the dislocation rate after DM-THA and to compare outcomes between DM-THA and BHA.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies (ten cohort studies on DM-THA and seven comparative studies of DM-THA and BHA) were selected. These studies included 2,793 patients (2,799 hips), made up of 2,263 DM-THA patients (2,269 hips) and 530 BHA patients (530 hips). In all, 16 studies were analyzed to evaluate dislocation rate after DM-THA. The cumulative dislocation rate was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3 to 5). Seven studies were analyzed to compare the rates dislocation and surgical-site infection. The rate of dislocation was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (risk ratio (RR) 0.3; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.53, p < 0.001, Z -4.11). There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical-site infection between the two groups (p = 0.580). Six studies reported all-cause reoperations. The rate of reoperation was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.78, p = 0.003, Z -3.01). Five studies reported one-year mortality. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (RR 0.58 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75, p < 0.0001, Z -4.2).

CONCLUSION

While the evidence available consisted mainly of non-randomized studies, DM-THA appeared to be a viable option for patients with displaced fractures of the femoral neck, with better reported rates of dislocation, reoperation, and mortality than BHA. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(11):1457-1466.

摘要

目的

评估双动髋关节置换术(DM-THA)治疗股骨颈移位骨折患者脱位的发生率,并比较 DM-THA 和双极半髋关节置换术(BHA)治疗后脱位、手术部位感染、再次手术和一年死亡率。

方法

根据以下标准选择研究:1)研究设计(回顾性队列研究、前瞻性队列研究、回顾性比较研究、前瞻性比较研究和随机对照研究(RCT));2)研究人群(股骨颈骨折患者);3)干预(DM-THA 或 BHA);4)结局(术后随访期间的并发症和临床结果)。进行汇总荟萃分析以评估 DM-THA 后脱位的发生率,并比较 DM-THA 和 BHA 的结果。

结果

共纳入 17 项研究(10 项 DM-THA 队列研究和 7 项 DM-THA 和 BHA 的比较研究)。这些研究共纳入 2793 例患者(2799 髋),其中 2263 例接受 DM-THA 治疗(2269 髋),530 例接受 BHA 治疗(530 髋)。共有 16 项研究分析了 DM-THA 后脱位发生率。累积脱位率为 4%(95%置信区间(CI)3 至 5)。有 7 项研究分析了脱位率和手术部位感染率。DM-THA 组的脱位率明显低于 BHA 组(风险比(RR)0.3;95%CI 0.17 至 0.53,p <0.001,Z=-4.11)。两组手术部位感染率无显著差异(p=0.580)。有 6 项研究报告了所有原因的再次手术。DM-THA 组的再次手术率明显低于 BHA 组(RR 0.5;95%CI 0.32 至 0.78,p=0.003,Z=-3.01)。有 5 项研究报告了一年死亡率。DM-THA 组的死亡率明显低于 BHA 组(RR 0.58 95%CI 0.45 至 0.75,p <0.0001,Z=-4.2)。

结论

尽管现有证据主要来自非随机研究,但与 BHA 相比,DM-THA 似乎是治疗股骨颈移位骨折患者的可行选择,其报告的脱位、再次手术和死亡率均优于 BHA。引用本文:2020;102-B(11):1457-1466。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索