Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1457-1466. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0610.R2.
To evaluate the rate of dislocation following dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, and to compare rates of dislocation, surgical-site infection, reoperation, and one-year mortality between DM-THA and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA).
Studies were selected based on the following criteria: 1) study design (retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, retrospective comparative studies, prospective comparative studies, and randomized controlled studies (RCTs)); 2) study population (patients with femoral neck fracture); 3) intervention (DM-THA or BHA); and 4) outcomes (complications during postoperative follow-up and clinical results). Pooled meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the dislocation rate after DM-THA and to compare outcomes between DM-THA and BHA.
A total of 17 studies (ten cohort studies on DM-THA and seven comparative studies of DM-THA and BHA) were selected. These studies included 2,793 patients (2,799 hips), made up of 2,263 DM-THA patients (2,269 hips) and 530 BHA patients (530 hips). In all, 16 studies were analyzed to evaluate dislocation rate after DM-THA. The cumulative dislocation rate was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3 to 5). Seven studies were analyzed to compare the rates dislocation and surgical-site infection. The rate of dislocation was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (risk ratio (RR) 0.3; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.53, p < 0.001, Z -4.11). There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical-site infection between the two groups (p = 0.580). Six studies reported all-cause reoperations. The rate of reoperation was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.78, p = 0.003, Z -3.01). Five studies reported one-year mortality. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (RR 0.58 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75, p < 0.0001, Z -4.2).
While the evidence available consisted mainly of non-randomized studies, DM-THA appeared to be a viable option for patients with displaced fractures of the femoral neck, with better reported rates of dislocation, reoperation, and mortality than BHA. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(11):1457-1466.
评估双动髋关节置换术(DM-THA)治疗股骨颈移位骨折患者脱位的发生率,并比较 DM-THA 和双极半髋关节置换术(BHA)治疗后脱位、手术部位感染、再次手术和一年死亡率。
根据以下标准选择研究:1)研究设计(回顾性队列研究、前瞻性队列研究、回顾性比较研究、前瞻性比较研究和随机对照研究(RCT));2)研究人群(股骨颈骨折患者);3)干预(DM-THA 或 BHA);4)结局(术后随访期间的并发症和临床结果)。进行汇总荟萃分析以评估 DM-THA 后脱位的发生率,并比较 DM-THA 和 BHA 的结果。
共纳入 17 项研究(10 项 DM-THA 队列研究和 7 项 DM-THA 和 BHA 的比较研究)。这些研究共纳入 2793 例患者(2799 髋),其中 2263 例接受 DM-THA 治疗(2269 髋),530 例接受 BHA 治疗(530 髋)。共有 16 项研究分析了 DM-THA 后脱位发生率。累积脱位率为 4%(95%置信区间(CI)3 至 5)。有 7 项研究分析了脱位率和手术部位感染率。DM-THA 组的脱位率明显低于 BHA 组(风险比(RR)0.3;95%CI 0.17 至 0.53,p <0.001,Z=-4.11)。两组手术部位感染率无显著差异(p=0.580)。有 6 项研究报告了所有原因的再次手术。DM-THA 组的再次手术率明显低于 BHA 组(RR 0.5;95%CI 0.32 至 0.78,p=0.003,Z=-3.01)。有 5 项研究报告了一年死亡率。DM-THA 组的死亡率明显低于 BHA 组(RR 0.58 95%CI 0.45 至 0.75,p <0.0001,Z=-4.2)。
尽管现有证据主要来自非随机研究,但与 BHA 相比,DM-THA 似乎是治疗股骨颈移位骨折患者的可行选择,其报告的脱位、再次手术和死亡率均优于 BHA。引用本文:2020;102-B(11):1457-1466。