Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun 1;33(6):832-838. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001957.
Increasing attention is paid to measure patient's experience using specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) as tool to assess the overall quality of care provided. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the United European Gastroenterology have recognized the measure of quality of endoscopy facilities as a priority to provide an adequate service. However, although some studies included patient satisfaction measurement, specific PREMs for gastrointestinal endoscopy are limited, especially in the field of pancreatobiliary endoscopy, with heterogeneous methods and results. This study is aimed at systematically reviewing the literature to summarize the available PREMs for pancreatobiliary endoscopy and to highlight areas of implementation.
PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched until February 2020.
The search initially retrieved 1064 articles, but only six were includable. The identified studies employed several methods to measure patient's experience, with the most frequently used questionnaires being Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Satisfaction Questionnaire and Group Health Association of America-9. The following areas that need implementation were identified: (a) evaluation of pain is one of the most investigated areas but seems marginal, as most pancreatobiliary endoscopic procedures are performed under deep sedation; (b) endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are considered as a whole, but they have very different indication and contexts (e.g. inpatients or outpatients); (c) 'experience' and 'satisfaction' are wrongly considered as synonyms; (d) the optimal modality and timing of questionnaire administration are unclear.
There are few tools to measure PREMS in pancreatobiliary endoscopy with several limitations. We have, therefore, started the process of building a specific PREM tool for pancreatobiliary EUS.
越来越多的人关注使用特定的患者报告体验测量(PREMs)来评估提供的整体护理质量,以此来衡量患者的体验。欧洲胃肠道内镜学会和欧洲联合胃肠病学已经认识到,将内镜设施的质量衡量作为提供充足服务的优先事项。然而,尽管一些研究包括患者满意度测量,但针对胃肠内镜的特定 PREMs 是有限的,特别是在胰胆内镜领域,方法和结果存在异质性。本研究旨在系统地回顾文献,总结可用于胰胆内镜的 PREMs,并强调实施的领域。
检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库,检索时间截至 2020 年 2 月。
最初检索到 1064 篇文章,但只有 6 篇符合纳入标准。确定的研究采用了多种方法来衡量患者的体验,最常使用的问卷是胃肠道内镜满意度问卷和美国团体健康协会-9 问卷。需要实施的领域包括:(a)疼痛评估是研究最多的领域之一,但似乎很边缘化,因为大多数胰胆内镜检查都是在深度镇静下进行的;(b)内镜超声(EUS)和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术被视为一个整体,但它们的适应证和背景非常不同(例如,住院或门诊患者);(c)“经验”和“满意度”被错误地视为同义词;(d)问卷管理的最佳方式和时间尚不清楚。
在胰胆内镜中,用于测量 PREMs 的工具很少,且存在一些局限性。因此,我们已经开始为胰胆 EUS 构建特定的 PREM 工具。