Suppr超能文献

HEART 评分的观察者间一致性:一项多中心前瞻性研究。

The interobserver agreement of the HEART-score, a multicentre prospective study.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis Dordrecht & Zwijndrecht.

Emergency Department, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Rotterdam.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr 1;28(2):111-118. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000758.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Chest pain is one of the most common presentations to the emergency department (ED). The HEART-score is used to assess the 30-day risk of developing a major adverse cardiac event (MACE). The HEART-score enables clinicians to classify patients in low, intermediate, or high-risk groups though little is known as to whether this can be done reliably and reproducibly in a prehospital setting.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the interobserver agreement of the HEART-score between ambulance nurses and ED physicians.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥18 years, with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin presented by ambulance to the EDs of four regional hospitals, were prospectively enrolled between October 2018 and April 2019.

OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was interobserver agreement of the HEART-scores calculated by ambulance nurses compared to those calculated by ED physicians. Agreement was measured using Cohen's Kappa (K) both for overall HEART-score and dichotomized HEART categories. A secondary endpoint was the occurrence of a MACE at 30 days after inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 307 patients were enrolled of which 166 patients were male (54%). The mean age was 64.8 years. In 23% (95% confidence interval, 18-27), patients were scored in the low-risk category by both ambulance nurses and ED physicians. The K for the overall HEART-score compared between ambulance nurses and ED physicians was 0.514. The K for the low-risk category versus intermediate and high-risk category was 0.591. Both are defined as 'moderate'. MACE within 30 days occurred in 64 patients (21%). In the low-risk group as defined by the ambulance nurses, there was a 7% risk of MACE compared to an average 5% MACE risk in the ED physician group.

CONCLUSIONS

The moderate interobserver agreement of the HEART-score does not currently support the use of the HEART-score by ambulance nurses in a prehospital setting. Training for prehospital nurses is vital to ensure that they are able to calculate the HEART-score accurately.

摘要

背景与重要性

胸痛是急诊科(ED)最常见的就诊原因之一。HEART 评分用于评估 30 天内发生重大不良心脏事件(MACE)的风险。HEART 评分使临床医生能够通过低、中、高风险组对患者进行分类,但对于在院前环境中是否可以可靠且可重复地进行分类知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在比较救护车护士和 ED 医生对 HEART 评分的观察者间一致性。

设计、地点和参与者:2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 4 月,前瞻性纳入因疑似心源性胸痛由救护车送往四家地区医院急诊科的≥18 岁患者。

结局测量和分析

主要终点是由救护车护士计算的 HEART 评分与由 ED 医生计算的 HEART 评分之间的观察者间一致性。使用 Cohen's Kappa(K)测量总体 HEART 评分和二分 HEART 分类的一致性。次要终点是纳入后 30 天内发生 MACE 的情况。

主要结果

共纳入 307 例患者,其中 166 例(54%)为男性。平均年龄为 64.8 岁。在 23%(95%置信区间,18-27)的患者中,救护车护士和 ED 医生均将患者评为低危。与 ED 医生相比,救护车护士计算的整体 HEART 评分的 K 值为 0.514。低危与中危和高危分类的 K 值为 0.591。两者均定义为“中度”。30 天内发生 MACE 的患者有 64 例(21%)。在救护车护士定义的低危组中,MACE 风险为 7%,而 ED 医生组的平均 MACE 风险为 5%。

结论

目前,HEART 评分的观察者间中等一致性不支持在院前环境中由救护车护士使用 HEART 评分。对院前护士进行培训对于确保他们能够准确计算 HEART 评分至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验