• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用先进的气动压缩装置在家中评估下肢淋巴水肿患者的生活质量变化。

Assessment of quality of life changes in patients with lower extremity lymphedema using an advanced pneumatic compression device at home.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Hospital, New York City, NY.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Hospital, New York City, NY.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 May;9(3):745-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.10.013
PMID:33137494
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lymphedema is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare resource usage. Conventional therapy efficacy has been limited, with poor surgical salvage options. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that the use of advanced pneumatic compression devices (APCDs) improves clinical outcomes. However, limited evidence regarding their role in healthcare cost mitigation or health-related quality of life (QOL) is available.

METHODS

The present postmarket, multicenter, single-arm, observational clinical trial conducted in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System evaluated patients with a diagnosis of primary or secondary edema of unilateral or bilateral lower extremities treated with the Flexitouch APCD (Tactile Medical, Minneapolis, Minn) from February 2016 to March 2019. The patients were assessed at baseline and 12, 24, and 52 weeks from enrollment by limb circumference, QOL assessments (short form-36 and Lymphedema Quality of Life), device compliance, cellulitis episodes, and lymphedema-related healthcare use since the previous visit. The primary endpoints of interest were the QOL at baseline compared with at 12 weeks, unscheduled lymphedema-related clinic visits, and hospital admissions at 52 weeks. The secondary endpoints included the change in limb girth and QOL at 52 weeks compared with baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients with lower extremity lymphedema were prospectively enrolled. The present study reports the interim data for the first 74 subjects to complete 52 weeks of APCD treatment. The cohort was predominately male (94.6%), elderly (mean age, 67 years), obese (median body mass index, 32 kg/m), and most commonly enrolled for the treatment of phlebolymphedema (71.6%) with largely bilateral lower extremity involvement (91.9%). No significant difference was seen in QOL at 12 weeks. However, at 52 weeks, the Lymphedema Quality of Life scores had significantly improved from baseline (6.3 vs 7.4; P < .0001) and the short form-36 had demonstrated significant improvement from baseline in the physical component (38.6 vs 40.8; P = .035), with an effect toward overall improvement in the mental component (49.9 vs 51.3; P = .549). The limb circumference had decreased significantly at 12 weeks compared with baseline (28.5 cm vs 27.7 cm; P = .0005) in the most affected lower extremity, and this reduction had remained stable for the study duration. APCD treatment was associated with a significant reduction in cellulitis episodes (24.3% vs 8.1%; P = .005), lymphedema-related clinic visits (2.2 vs 0.7; P = .02), urgent care visits (1.2 vs 0.3; P = .004), and hospital admissions (0.5 vs 0.1; P = .047) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The Flexitouch APCD resulted in initial significant limb girth reduction as early as 12 weeks and a steady and sustained improvement in health-related QOL for ≤1 year. The latter was likely reflective of a decrease in cellulitis episodes and fewer associated lymphedema-related clinic and urgent care visits and hospital admissions.

摘要

目的

淋巴水肿与显著的发病率和医疗资源使用有关。传统疗法的疗效有限,手术挽救选择也不理想。初步研究表明,使用先进的气动压缩设备(APCD)可改善临床结果。然而,关于其在减轻医疗保健成本或健康相关生活质量(QOL)方面的作用的证据有限。

方法

本研究为退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中的多中心、单臂、观察性临床研究,评估了自 2016 年 2 月至 2019 年 3 月期间使用 Flexitouch APCD(触觉医疗,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)治疗单侧或双侧下肢原发性或继发性水肿的患者。患者在入组后 12、24 和 52 周分别通过肢体周长、QOL 评估(SF-36 和淋巴水肿生活质量)、设备依从性、蜂窝织炎发作和上次就诊后淋巴水肿相关医疗保健使用情况进行评估。主要研究终点是基线与 12 周的 QOL 比较、未计划的淋巴水肿相关就诊和 52 周的住院。次要终点包括 52 周与基线相比肢体周长和 QOL 的变化。

结果

共前瞻性纳入了 178 例下肢淋巴水肿患者。本研究报告了前 74 例完成 52 周 APCD 治疗的患者的中期数据。该队列主要为男性(94.6%)、老年(平均年龄 67 岁)、肥胖(中位数体重指数 32kg/m),最常因静脉淋巴水肿(71.6%)接受治疗,且主要为双侧下肢受累(91.9%)。12 周时 QOL 无显著差异。然而,52 周时,淋巴水肿生活质量评分较基线显著改善(6.3 分比 7.4 分;P<0.0001),SF-36 在生理成分方面也显著改善(38.6 分比 40.8 分;P=0.035),总体心理健康成分也有改善趋势(49.9 分比 51.3 分;P=0.549)。最受影响的下肢在 12 周时与基线相比肢体周长明显缩小(28.5cm 比 27.7cm;P=0.0005),且在研究期间保持稳定。APCD 治疗与蜂窝织炎发作(24.3%比 8.1%;P=0.005)、淋巴水肿相关就诊(2.2 次比 0.7 次;P=0.02)、急诊就诊(1.2 次比 0.3 次;P=0.004)和住院治疗(0.5 次比 0.1 次;P=0.047)次数的减少显著相关。

结论

Flexitouch APCD 最早在 12 周即可显著减少肢体周长,且在≤1 年内持续改善健康相关 QOL。后者可能反映了蜂窝织炎发作减少以及与淋巴水肿相关的就诊和急诊就诊以及住院治疗次数减少。

相似文献

1
Assessment of quality of life changes in patients with lower extremity lymphedema using an advanced pneumatic compression device at home.使用先进的气动压缩装置在家中评估下肢淋巴水肿患者的生活质量变化。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 May;9(3):745-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
2
Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes with at home advanced pneumatic compression treatment of lower extremity lymphedema.下肢淋巴水肿在家中采用先进气动压缩治疗的健康相关生活质量和临床结局的纵向评估。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101892. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101892. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Health and economic benefits of advanced pneumatic compression devices in patients with phlebolymphedema.深静脉血栓预防的充气压力循环治疗设备的健康和经济效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;69(2):571-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
Patient-Centered Outcomes of a Lymphedema Pump in Patients with Symptomatic Lower Extremity Edema.以患者为中心的下肢水肿症状性患者淋巴水肿泵的结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;108:333-337. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.04.031. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
5
Pneumatic compression device treatment of lower extremity lymphedema elicits improved limb volume and patient-reported outcomes.气动压迫装置治疗下肢淋巴水肿可改善肢体容积和患者报告的结局。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;46(4):480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
6
Pneumatic Compression Improves Quality of Life in Patients with Lower-Extremity Lymphedema.气压治疗可改善下肢淋巴水肿患者的生活质量。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;30:40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
7
Results from a comparative study to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of a nonpneumatic compression device vs an advanced pneumatic compression device for lower extremity lymphedema swelling (TEAYS study).一项比较研究的结果,该研究旨在评估非充气式压缩装置与先进充气式压缩装置对下肢淋巴水肿肿胀的治疗效果(TEAYS研究)。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Jan;13(1):101965. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101965. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
8
A randomized controlled trial comparing two types of pneumatic compression for breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment in the home.一项比较两种气动压迫方式治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的家庭治疗的随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Dec;20(12):3279-86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1455-2. Epub 2012 May 2.
9
The Cutaneous, Net Clinical, and Health Economic Benefits of Advanced Pneumatic Compression Devices in Patients With Lymphedema.先进气动加压装置在淋巴水肿患者中的皮肤、临床净获益和健康经济学效益。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Nov;151(11):1187-93. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1895.
10
Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial.高级气动压迫治疗头颈部淋巴水肿:一项随机等待名单对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05540-8. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of complex decongestive therapy in managing upper limb lymphedema in female breast cancer patients at a palliative care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh.孟加拉国一家三级护理医院姑息治疗科针对女性乳腺癌患者上肢淋巴水肿采用综合消肿疗法的效果
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 20;20(6):e0326040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326040. eCollection 2025.
2
Cancer-Related Lymphedema and Psychological Distress.癌症相关的淋巴水肿与心理困扰。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Nov;26(11):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01543-y. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
Results from a comparative study to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of a nonpneumatic compression device vs an advanced pneumatic compression device for lower extremity lymphedema swelling (TEAYS study).
一项比较研究的结果,该研究旨在评估非充气式压缩装置与先进充气式压缩装置对下肢淋巴水肿肿胀的治疗效果(TEAYS研究)。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Jan;13(1):101965. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101965. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
4
Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes with at home advanced pneumatic compression treatment of lower extremity lymphedema.下肢淋巴水肿在家中采用先进气动压缩治疗的健康相关生活质量和临床结局的纵向评估。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101892. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101892. Epub 2024 Apr 16.