Suppr超能文献

学习动力移动使用评估2.0版在应用于使用电动轮椅进行驾驶学习的儿童和成人时的评分者间信度。

Inter-rater reliability of the assessment of learning powered mobility use, version 2.0, when applied with children and adults engaged in Driving to Learn in a powered wheelchair.

作者信息

Svensson Eva, Nilsson Lisbeth

机构信息

Child and Youth Habilitation, Hässleholm, Habilitation & Assistive Technology, Kristianstad, Skåne, Sweden.

Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science, Health Science Centre, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2021 Apr;68(2):115-123. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12709. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Assessment of Learning Powered mobility use (ALP) tool including the ALP instrument and facilitating strategies, was developed for Driving to Learn. This therapeutic intervention aims to provide children and adults who have profound cognitive disabilities with opportunities to learn tool use through powered mobility practise. To allow for longer intervention periods, a partnership was developed between professionals supervising Driving to Learn and persons accompanying children or adults to their practice sessions. Accompanying persons (relatives or assistants) gradually took on shared responsibility for applying the intervention and conducting assessments with the ALP-instrument. The aim of this study was to test the inter-rater reliability of the ALP-instrument version 2.0 as applied in this novel partnership in assessment and intervention.

METHOD

A psychometric analysis compared pair-wise assessments with the ALP-instrument version 2.0, made independently by professional supervisors and accompanying persons following each Driving to Learn session. Weighted kappa statistic was used to compare the matched pair ordinal data.

RESULTS

Eight professional supervisors and 22 accompanying persons independently completed assessments with the ALP-instrument after 55 sessions with six children and five adults, who each participated in five Driving to Learn sessions. When the scores from the 55 pairs of assessments were compared, a weighted kappa value of 0.85 was obtained, indicating very good inter-rater reliability between the two rater groups.

CONCLUSION

The resulting inter-rater reliability suggests that it is reliable to implement the ALP-instrument as part of partnership in intervention between supervisors and accompanying persons. Provision of longer periods of Driving to Learn is possible when those who accompany the child or adult are able to gradually assume responsibility for practice and assessment under the supervision of a professional. This partnership approach enables children and adults with multiple and complex disabilities to practise and learn in accordance with their conditions and needs.

摘要

引言

学习动力移动使用评估(ALP)工具包括ALP仪器和促进策略,是为“驾车学习”项目开发的。这种治疗性干预旨在为患有严重认知障碍的儿童和成人提供通过动力移动练习学习工具使用的机会。为了延长干预时间,在监督“驾车学习”项目的专业人员与陪同儿童或成人参加练习课程的人员之间建立了合作关系。陪同人员(亲属或助手)逐渐承担起应用干预措施和使用ALP仪器进行评估的共同责任。本研究的目的是测试在这种评估和干预的新型合作关系中应用的ALP仪器2.0版本的评分者间信度。

方法

进行了一项心理测量分析,比较了专业监督员和陪同人员在每次“驾车学习”课程后独立使用ALP仪器2.0版本进行的成对评估。使用加权kappa统计量来比较匹配的成对有序数据。

结果

8名专业监督员和22名陪同人员在对6名儿童和5名成人进行了55次课程后,独立使用ALP仪器完成了评估,每名儿童和成人各参加了5次“驾车学习”课程。当比较这55对评估的分数时,获得了0.85的加权kappa值,表明两个评分者组之间具有非常好的评分者间信度。

结论

由此产生的评分者间信度表明,将ALP仪器作为监督员和陪同人员之间干预合作关系的一部分来实施是可靠的。当陪同儿童或成人的人员能够在专业人员的监督下逐渐承担起练习和评估的责任时,就可以提供更长时间的“驾车学习”。这种合作方式使患有多种复杂残疾的儿童和成人能够根据自身情况和需求进行练习和学习。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验