• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放手术与机器人辅助艾佛-刘易斯手术后与健康相关的长期生活质量——一项倾向评分匹配研究

Long-Term, Health-Related Quality of Life after Open and Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Procedures-A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

作者信息

Mehdorn Anne-Sophie, Möller Thorben, Franke Frederike, Richter Florian, Kersebaum Jan-Niclas, Becker Thomas, Egberts Jan-Hendrik

机构信息

Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 30;9(11):3513. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113513.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9113513
PMID:33142987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7693702/
Abstract

Esophagectomies are among the most invasive surgical procedures that highly influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recent improvements have helped to achieve longer survival. Therefore, long-term postoperative HRQoL needs to be emphasized in addition to classic criterions like morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare short and long-term HRQoL after open transthoracic esophagectomies (OTEs) and robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (RAMIEs) in patients suffering from esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prospectively collected HRQoL-data (from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)) were correlated with clinical courses. Only patients suffering from minor postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification of < 2) after R0 Ivor-Lewis-procedures were included. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status-score (ASA-score), tumor stage, and perioperative therapy were used for propensity score matching (PSM). Twelve RAMIE and 29 OTE patients met the inclusion criteria. RAMIE patients reported significantly better emotional and social function while suffering from significantly less pain and less physical impairment four months after surgery. The long-term follow up confirmed the results. Long-term postoperative HRQoL and self-perception partly exceeded the levels of the healthy reference population. Minor operative trauma by robotic approaches resulted in significantly reduced physical impairments while improving HRQoL and self-perception, especially in the long-term. However, further long-term results are warranted to confirm this positive trend.

摘要

食管切除术是最具侵入性的外科手术之一,对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)有很大影响。最近的进展有助于实现更长的生存期。因此,除了发病率和死亡率等经典标准外,还需要强调术后长期的HRQoL。我们旨在比较开放性经胸食管切除术(OTE)和机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)治疗食管腺癌患者后的短期和长期HRQoL。前瞻性收集的HRQoL数据(来自欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷-C30(EORTC QLQ-C30))与临床病程相关。仅纳入在R0 Ivor-Lewis手术术后出现轻微并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级<2)的患者。使用年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况评分(ASA评分)、肿瘤分期和围手术期治疗进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。12例RAMIE患者和29例OTE患者符合纳入标准。RAMIE患者在术后四个月时报告情绪和社会功能明显更好,同时疼痛和身体损伤明显更少。长期随访证实了这些结果。术后长期的HRQoL和自我认知部分超过了健康对照人群的水平。机器人手术方法造成的手术创伤较小,导致身体损伤明显减少,同时改善了HRQoL和自我认知,尤其是在长期。然而,需要进一步的长期结果来证实这一积极趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/8e4e81314689/jcm-09-03513-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/434799671df7/jcm-09-03513-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/6001b798a83c/jcm-09-03513-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/3758e7ab2a2e/jcm-09-03513-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/ea8cbeed9152/jcm-09-03513-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/9b95b703146d/jcm-09-03513-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/8e4e81314689/jcm-09-03513-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/434799671df7/jcm-09-03513-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/6001b798a83c/jcm-09-03513-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/3758e7ab2a2e/jcm-09-03513-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/ea8cbeed9152/jcm-09-03513-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/9b95b703146d/jcm-09-03513-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba84/7693702/8e4e81314689/jcm-09-03513-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term, Health-Related Quality of Life after Open and Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Procedures-A Propensity Score-Matched Study.开放手术与机器人辅助艾佛-刘易斯手术后与健康相关的长期生活质量——一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 30;9(11):3513. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113513.
2
Long-term quality of life after hybrid robot-assisted and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single center: a comparative analysis.单中心机器人辅助与开放 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术的长期生活质量比较:一项对照分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 11;409(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03310-2.
3
Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸经胸食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
4
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
5
Reducing the Risks of Esophagectomies: A Retrospective Comparison of Hybrid versus Full-Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) Approaches.降低食管切除术风险:杂交手术与全机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)方法的回顾性比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 7;12(18):5823. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185823.
6
Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.体重指数对机器人辅助Ivor-Lewis食管切除术后手术结果的影响:对一家高容量三级医疗中心129例病例的回顾性分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12484.
7
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.倾向性评分匹配分析比较微创 Ivor Lewis 与微创 McKeown 食管切除术。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):128-133. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002982.
8
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开放食管切除术的比较:一项随机临床试验的长期随访结果。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Nov 26;33(Supplement_2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa079.
9
The effect of age on short-term and mid-term outcomes after thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.年龄对胸腔镜Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术后短期和中期结局的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01435-5.
10
Early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.机器人辅助与胸腔镜辅助 Ivor Lewis 食管癌根治术的早期结果:倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May;26(5):1284-1291. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07273-3. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Robotic Surgery the Future for Resectable Esophageal Cancer?: A Systematic Literature Review of Oncological and Clinical Outcomes.机器人手术会是可切除食管癌的未来治疗方式吗?:肿瘤学及临床结局的系统文献综述
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4281-4297. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15148-5. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives.胃食管交界腺癌的微创手术:当前证据与未来展望。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):1675-1690. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675.
3
Robot-assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (RAILE): A review of surgical techniques and clinical outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related quality of life following total minimally invasive, hybrid minimally invasive or open oesophagectomy: a population-based cohort study.全微创、杂交微创或开放食管切除术对健康相关生活质量的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):702-708. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11998. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: A standardized operative technique in 11 steps.Ivor-Lewis 食管切除术:11 步标准化手术技术。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Feb;17(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2175. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
3
Favourable long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer treated with extended transhiatal esophagectomy combined with en bloc lymphadenectomy: results from a retrospective observational cohort study.
机器人辅助艾弗·刘易斯食管癌切除术(RAILE):手术技术与临床结果综述
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 4;9:998282. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.998282. eCollection 2022.
4
A comparison between bronchial blockers and double-lumen tubes for patients undergoing lung resection: A propensity score-matched cohort study.支气管阻塞器与双腔管用于肺切除术患者的比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Int J Med Sci. 2022 Sep 25;19(11):1706-1714. doi: 10.7150/ijms.75835. eCollection 2022.
5
C-Reactive Protein as Predictor for Infectious Complications after Robotic and Open Esophagectomies.C反应蛋白作为机器人辅助和开放食管切除术后感染性并发症的预测指标
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 26;11(19):5654. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195654.
6
The Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Step Toward Better Outcomes?微创手术在食管癌治疗中的应用:迈向更好治疗效果的一步?
Oncol Ther. 2022 Dec;10(2):337-349. doi: 10.1007/s40487-022-00206-3. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in the Surgical Treatment of Barrett's Adenocarcinoma.巴雷特腺癌外科治疗中的今日之误与明日之智
Visc Med. 2022 Jun;38(3):203-211. doi: 10.1159/000524928. Epub 2022 May 24.
8
The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections.吲哚菁绿在机器人辅助肝切除术中的作用。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 19;11(12):3527. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123527.
9
Pancreatic Fistula and Biochemical Leak after Splenectomy: Incidence and Risk Factors-A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.脾切除术后胰瘘和生化漏的发生及危险因素:一项回顾性单中心分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2517-2525. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02531-7. Epub 2022 May 4.
10
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与电视辅助微创食管切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Nov;10(11):4601-4616. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1482.
经扩大经裂孔食管切除术联合整块淋巴结清扫术治疗的食管癌患者的长期良好生存:一项回顾性观察队列研究的结果
BMC Surg. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00855-z.
4
Current Issues in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的当前问题
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug 5;53(4):152-159. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.4.152.
5
Outcomes after total robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched comparison with hybrid robotic esophagectomy.全机器人食管癌切除术的术后结果:与杂交机器人食管癌切除术的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5310-5320. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.58.
6
Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer-the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT).腹腔镜辅助与开放性食管癌切除术治疗食管癌患者的随机对照试验(ROMIO 研究):方案设计
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030907.
7
Long-Term Quality of Life After Total Gastrectomy Versus Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.全胃切除术与经左胸入路食管胃切除术治疗后长期生活质量的比较。
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):838-848. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05281-8.
8
Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.全胸腔镜微创食管切除术的吻合技术及相关并发症:来自 EsoBenchmark 数据库的结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):820-826. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003538.
9
Quality of Life During and After Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal and Junctional Cancer.食管癌和食管胃交界癌新辅助放化疗期间和治疗结束后的生活质量。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(13):4765-4772. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07779-w. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Using Benchmarking Standards to Evaluate Transition to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.使用基准标准评估向微创食管切除术的过渡。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Feb;109(2):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.019. Epub 2019 Sep 18.