Institute of Intensive Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Burn Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Burns. 2021 Jun;47(4):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement has emerged as an alternative to surgical eschar removal. Indications include partial thickness, mixed pattern, and full-thickness burns. Enzymatic debridement has been approved by the European Medicines Agency for treating burn wounds affecting <15% total body surface area (TBSA). Data and evidence for the treatment of areas >15% TBSA in one session is scarce. The aim of this retrospective study was to retrospectively analyze off-label use of enzymatic debridement in a single burn center for large TBSA burns.
Between 01/2017 and 12/2018, 59 patients with partial- to full-thickness burns underwent enzymatic debridement in a single center study. Patients were categorized into two groups: the regular use group with a treated area less than 15% TBSA and the off-label group (OG) with larger TBSA debrided in one session. Treatment was evaluated for systemic inflammatory reaction, bleeding, hemodynamic instability and electrolyte shifts.
In total, 49 patients were treated in the regular use group with a median application area of 6% (IQR 2.5-9.5) and 10 patients were treated in the off-label group with a median application area of 18% (IQR 15-19) TBSA. We found no significant differences regarding blood pressure, body temperature or hemodynamic stability during and after enzymatic debridement. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed in either group. Catecholamine use was similar in both groups. No differences in leukocyte counts, CRP, PCT and lactate prior to application and during the following three days were observed. Sodium, potassium, chloride and phosphate levels did not differ. We found no evidence of an electrolyte shift. Survival was 49 of 49 patients (100%) in the RG and 7 of 10 patients (70%) in the OG (p = 0.004).
Enzymatic debridement did not result in any expected or unexpected side effects in the patient groups investigated. These preliminary results indicate the potential safety of bromelain-based enzymatic debridementin the treatment of burns greater than 15% TBSA.
基于菠萝蛋白酶的酶清创术已成为手术清除焦痂的替代方法。适应证包括部分厚度、混合模式和全层烧伤。酶清创术已获得欧洲药品管理局批准,用于治疗总面积<15%(TBSA)的烧伤创面。单次治疗>15% TBSA 创面的数据和证据很少。本回顾性研究的目的是回顾性分析单一烧伤中心对大面积 TBSA 烧伤的酶清创术的超适应证应用。
在 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间,59 例部分至全层烧伤患者在单一中心研究中接受了酶清创术。患者分为两组:治疗面积<15% TBSA 的常规使用组(RU 组)和单次较大 TBSA 清创术的超适应证组(OG 组)。评估治疗的全身炎症反应、出血、血流动力学不稳定和电解质转移。
共有 49 例患者在常规使用组中接受治疗,治疗面积中位数为 6%(IQR 2.5-9.5),10 例患者在超适应证组中接受治疗,治疗面积中位数为 18%(IQR 15-19)TBSA。我们发现,在酶清创术期间和之后,两组的血压、体温或血流动力学稳定性均无显著差异。两组均未观察到与治疗相关的严重不良事件。两组儿茶酚胺的使用情况相似。在应用前和接下来的三天内,白细胞计数、CRP、PCT 和乳酸无差异。钠、钾、氯和磷酸盐水平无差异。我们未发现电解质转移的证据。RU 组的存活率为 49/49 例(100%),OG 组的存活率为 7/10 例(70%)(p=0.004)。
在接受研究的患者群体中,酶清创术未导致任何预期或意外的副作用。这些初步结果表明,基于菠萝蛋白酶的酶清创术在治疗>15% TBSA 烧伤方面具有潜在的安全性。