Loap P, Tkatchenko N, Kirova Y
Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75006 Paris, France.
Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75006 Paris, France.
Cancer Radiother. 2020 Dec;24(8):826-833. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
The primary objective of this work was to implement and evaluate a cardiac atlas-based autosegmentation technique based on the "Workflow Box" software (Mirada Medical, Oxford UK), in order to delineate cardiac substructures according to European Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ESTRO) guidelines; review and comparison with other cardiac atlas-based autosegmentation algorithms published to date.
Of an atlas of data set from 20 breast cancer patients' CT scans with recontoured cardiac substructures creation according to the ESTRO guidelines. Performance evaluation on a validation data set consisting of 20 others CT scans acquired in the same treatment position: cardiac substructure were automatically contoured by the Mirada system, using the implemented cardiac atlas, and simultaneously manually contoured by a radiation oncologist. The Dice similarity coefficient was used to evaluate the concordance level between the manual and the automatic segmentations.
Dice similarity coefficient value was 0.95 for the whole heart and 0.80 for the four cardiac chambers. Average Dice similarity coefficient value for the left ventricle walls was 0.50, ranging between 0.34 for the apical wall and 0.70 for the lateral wall. Compared to manual contours, autosegmented substructure volumes were significantly smaller, with the exception of the left ventricle. Coronary artery segmentation was unsuccessful. Performances were overall similar to other published cardiac atlas-based autosegmentation algorithms.
The evaluated cardiac atlas-based autosegmentation technique, using the Mirada software, demonstrated acceptable performance for cardiac cavities delineation. However, algorithm improvement is still needed in order to develop efficient and trusted cardiac autosegmentation working tools for daily practice.
本研究的主要目的是基于“工作流盒”软件(英国牛津的米拉达医疗公司)实施并评估一种基于心脏图谱的自动分割技术,以便根据欧洲治疗放射肿瘤学会(ESTRO)指南描绘心脏亚结构;回顾并与迄今已发表的其他基于心脏图谱的自动分割算法进行比较。
使用来自20例乳腺癌患者CT扫描的数据集图谱,按照ESTRO指南创建重新勾勒轮廓的心脏亚结构。在由在相同治疗位置采集的另外20例CT扫描组成的验证数据集上进行性能评估:米拉达系统使用已实施的心脏图谱自动勾勒心脏亚结构,同时由放射肿瘤学家手动勾勒。使用骰子相似系数来评估手动分割和自动分割之间的一致性水平。
全心的骰子相似系数值为0.95,四个心腔的为0.80。左心室壁的平均骰子相似系数值为0.50,范围从心尖壁的0.34到侧壁的0.70。与手动轮廓相比,自动分割的亚结构体积明显更小,但左心室除外。冠状动脉分割未成功。性能总体上与其他已发表的基于心脏图谱的自动分割算法相似。
使用米拉达软件评估的基于心脏图谱的自动分割技术在描绘心脏腔室方面表现出可接受的性能。然而,仍需要改进算法,以便开发出用于日常实践的高效且可靠的心脏自动分割工作工具。