• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后再次行主动脉瓣介入治疗:全国再入院数据库分析。

Redo aortic valve intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Analysis of the nationwide readmission database.

机构信息

Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.

Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, United States.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 15;325:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.038. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.038
PMID:33144095
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of redo aortic valve intervention (AVI) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have not been well described. We thought to investigate the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of redo AVI after TAVR.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (from 2012 to 2017) was queried to identify admissions for TAVR. Redo AVI was defined as readmissions that required either TAVR or balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). A multivariable regression model was used to identify independent predictors of redo AVI. In-hospital outcomes of redo TAVR or BAV and redo SAVR were compared in the unadjusted model.

RESULTS

A total of weighted 148,200 (unweighted redo AVI 297, no redo AVI 73,804) index TAVRs were identified. A weighted 593 (435 TAVR or BAV and 158 SAVR) redo AVI was included with an incidence of 1.0 per 100 person-year during a median of 105 (interquartile range 41-195) days follow-up. Predictors of redo AVI were female, heart failure, obesity, atrial fibrillation, transapical approach, oral anticoagulant use, and acute kidney injury. In-hospital mortality of redo AVI was 7.6% (5.3% for redo TAVR or BAV vs. 13.8% for redo SAVR, unadjusted p = 0.10). Stroke, myocardial infarction, bleeding requiring transfusion, new pacemaker, and acute kidney injury rates were 4.7%, 2.6%, 9.3%, 10.0%, and 31.2%, respectively in redo AVI. Length of stay and hospital cost was 4.8 days and 55,826 U.S. dollars, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of redo AVI was low following TAVR but was associated with high mortality and morbidities.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后再次主动脉瓣干预(AVI)的结果尚未得到很好的描述。我们试图研究 TAVR 后再次 AVI 的发生率、预测因素和结果。

方法

从 2012 年至 2017 年,查询全国再入院数据库(Nationwide Readmission Database)以确定 TAVR 入院人数。再次 AVI 定义为需要 TAVR、球囊主动脉瓣成形术(BAV)或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的再入院。使用多变量回归模型确定再次 AVI 的独立预测因素。在未调整模型中比较再次 TAVR 或 BAV 和再次 SAVR 的住院期间结局。

结果

共确定了 148200 例加权指数 TAVR(未加权再次 AVI 297 例,无再次 AVI 73804 例)。在中位时间为 105(四分位距 41-195)天的随访中,纳入了 593 例(435 例 TAVR 或 BAV 和 158 例 SAVR)加权再次 AVI,发生率为每 100 人年 1.0 例。再次 AVI 的预测因素为女性、心力衰竭、肥胖、心房颤动、经心尖途径、口服抗凝剂使用和急性肾损伤。再次 AVI 的住院死亡率为 7.6%(再次 TAVR 或 BAV 为 5.3%,再次 SAVR 为 13.8%,未调整 p=0.10)。再次 AVI 的卒中和心肌梗死发生率分别为 4.7%和 2.6%,出血需要输血的发生率为 9.3%,新安装起搏器的发生率为 10.0%,急性肾损伤发生率为 31.2%。再次 AVI 的住院时间和住院费用分别为 4.8 天和 55826 美元。

结论

TAVR 后再次 AVI 的发生率较低,但与高死亡率和高发病率相关。

相似文献

1
Redo aortic valve intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Analysis of the nationwide readmission database.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后再次行主动脉瓣介入治疗:全国再入院数据库分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 15;325:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.038. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
2
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus isolated redo surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣中瓣技术与单独再次开胸主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;168(4):1003-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
3
Early readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术后的早期再入院情况。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):662-670. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26945. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
Readmission-related outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients aged 65 or older with bicuspid aortic valve.65 岁及以上二叶式主动脉瓣患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的再入院相关结局。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Jun;63:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
5
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.非教学医院经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):954-962. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27968. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性生物瓣主动脉瓣与再次开胸换瓣术治疗退行性生物瓣主动脉瓣的对比:一项比较中期结果的更新荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 1;97(7):1481-1488. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29541. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
7
Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach.再次行主动脉瓣置换术于既往无支架生物瓣主动脉瓣:经导管与外科途径。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):181-192. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29921. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
8
Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.比较生物人工主动脉瓣退变患者行瓣中瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术和再次外科主动脉瓣置换术的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):940-947. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29789. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
9
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
10
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as a Bridge to Aortic Valve Replacement: A Contemporary Nationwide Perspective.球囊主动脉瓣成形术作为主动脉瓣置换术的桥梁:当代全国视角。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):583-591. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.041. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The current state of transcatheter aortic valve replacement explant: an updated systematic review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术取出物的当前状态:一项更新的系统评价
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):85-97. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0075. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Surgical explantation of transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉生物瓣膜的外科取出术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 20;8:207-227. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.023. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
The Use of BASILICA Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction in a TAVI-TAVI Procedure.
在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)-经导管主动脉瓣置换术过程中使用BASILICA技术预防冠状动脉阻塞。
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 26;10(23):5534. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235534.