Baulechner Dennis, Jauker Frank, Neubauer Thomas A, Wolters Volkmar
Department of Animal Ecology and Systematics Justus Liebig University Giessen Giessen Germany.
Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden The Netherlands.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 11;10(20):11100-11110. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6746. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Closely related species are often assumed to be functionally similar. Phylogenetic information is thus widely used to infer functional diversity and assembly of communities. In contrast, evolutionary processes generating functional similarity of phylogenetically distinct taxa are rarely addressed in this context.To investigate the impact of convergent evolution on functional diversity (FD) and phylogenetic diversity (PD), we reconstructed the phylogenetic structure of carabid trophic groups. We then analyzed the mandible shapes using geometric morphometrics to link specialization in functional morphology with feeding specialization among herbivores, generalist carnivores, and specialized consumers of Collembola.Our results show that carabid feeding groups are paraphyletic. Herbivory evolved at least twice and specialization to Collembola predation at least three times. Species within feeding groups share a remarkably similar mandible morphology, which evolved convergently. While specialized mandibles of herbivores and collembolan specialists represent an adaptation to their main food source, the particular mandible morphologies do not necessarily reflect the degree of food specialization within feeding groups. Only a few species with a specialized herbivorous mandible may occasionally feed on animals, but the range of specific food resources in generalist carnivore species is large, despite an almost identical mandible shape.Thus, convergent evolution in specialized feeding groups reverses the relationship between PD and functional similarity compared with generalist carnivores. We conclude that phylogenetic relationship is a poor proxy of FD in carabids. Moreover, the inconsistencies between relatedness, morphological adaptation, and ecological function require caution in the characterization of functional groups. Rather than assuming general relationships between PD and FD, we suggest integrating the analysis of evolutionary processes into functional community analyses.
亲缘关系相近的物种通常被认为在功能上相似。因此,系统发育信息被广泛用于推断群落的功能多样性和组装。相比之下,在这种情况下,产生系统发育上不同分类单元功能相似性的进化过程很少被探讨。为了研究趋同进化对功能多样性(FD)和系统发育多样性(PD)的影响,我们重建了步甲食性类群的系统发育结构。然后,我们使用几何形态测量学分析了下颚形状,以将功能形态的特化与草食动物、广食性食肉动物和弹尾虫的专门消费者之间的取食特化联系起来。我们的结果表明,步甲的取食类群是并系的。食草性至少进化了两次,而对弹尾虫捕食的特化至少进化了三次。取食类群中的物种具有非常相似的下颚形态,这是趋同进化的结果。虽然草食动物和弹尾虫专家的特化下颚代表了对其主要食物来源的适应,但特定的下颚形态不一定反映取食类群内食物特化的程度。只有少数具有特化草食性下颚的物种可能偶尔以动物为食,尽管广食性食肉动物物种的下颚形状几乎相同,但其特定食物资源的范围却很大。因此,与广食性食肉动物相比,特化取食类群中的趋同进化逆转了PD与功能相似性之间的关系。我们得出结论,在步甲中,系统发育关系并不能很好地代表FD。此外,亲缘关系、形态适应和生态功能之间的不一致性要求在功能类群的表征中要谨慎。我们建议将进化过程的分析纳入功能群落分析,而不是假设PD和FD之间存在一般关系。