Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, Mentoring Undergraduates in Interdisciplinary Research (MUIR) Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Environmental Science and Policy Graduate Program, Leonard and Jayne Abess Center for Ecosystem Science and Policy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0240841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240841. eCollection 2020.
Morbidity and mortality impacts of extreme heat amplified by climate change will be unequally distributed among communities given pre-existing differences in socioeconomic, health, and environmental conditions. Many governments are interested in adaptation policies that target those especially vulnerable to the risks, but there are important questions about how to effectively identify and support communities most in need of heat adaptations. Here, we use an equity-oriented adaptation program from the state of California as a case study to evaluate the implications of the currently used environmental justice index (CalEnviroScreen 3.0) for the identification of socially vulnerable communities with climate change adaptation needs. As CalEnviroScreen is geared towards air and water pollution, we assess how community heat risks and adaptation needs would be evaluated differently under two more adaptation-relevant vulnerability indices: the Social Vulnerability Index and the Heat-Health Action Index. Our analysis considers communities at the census tract scale, as well as the patterns emerging at the regional scale. Using the current index, the state designates 25% of its census tracts as "disadvantaged" communities eligible for special adaptation funds. However, an additional 12.6% of the state's communities could be considered vulnerable if the two other indices were considered instead. Only 13.4% of communities are vulnerable across all three vulnerability indices studied. Choice of vulnerability index shapes statewide trends in extreme heat risk and is linked to a community's likelihood of receiving heat-related California Climate Investments (CCI) projects. Tracts that are vulnerable under the current pollution-focused index, but not under the heat-health specific index, received four times the number of heat-related interventions as tracts vulnerable under the reverse scenario. This study demonstrates important nuances relevant to implementing equity-oriented adaptation and explores the challenges, trade-offs, and opportunities in quantifying vulnerability.
由于社会经济、健康和环境条件的预先存在差异,气候变化加剧的极端高温对发病率和死亡率的影响将在社区之间不平等分配。许多政府都对针对那些特别容易受到风险影响的人群的适应政策感兴趣,但对于如何有效地确定和支持最需要适应高温的社区,存在着重要的问题。在这里,我们以加利福尼亚州的一项以公平为导向的适应计划为例,评估目前使用的环境正义指数(CalEnviroScreen 3.0)在识别具有气候变化适应需求的社会弱势群体社区方面的影响。由于 CalEnviroScreen 是针对空气和水污染的,我们评估了在两个更适应相关的脆弱性指数(社会脆弱性指数和热健康行动指数)下,社区热风险和适应需求将如何得到不同的评估。我们的分析考虑了人口普查区规模的社区,以及在区域规模上出现的模式。使用当前的指数,该州将其 25%的人口普查区指定为有资格获得特殊适应基金的“弱势”社区。然而,如果考虑另外两个指数,该州 12.6%的社区可能被认为是脆弱的。只有 13.4%的社区在所有三个脆弱性指数中都是脆弱的。脆弱性指数的选择塑造了全州极端高温风险的趋势,并与社区获得与热相关的加利福尼亚气候投资(CCI)项目的可能性相关。在当前以污染为重点的指数下脆弱的地段,比在相反情况下脆弱的地段更容易受到与热相关的干预措施的影响,其数量是后者的四倍。这项研究展示了与实施以公平为导向的适应相关的重要细微差别,并探讨了在量化脆弱性方面的挑战、权衡和机会。