Hassett Thomas C, Stuhlsatz Greta, Snyder John E
Office of Planning, Analysis, and Evaluation, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Federal Office of Rural Health Policy, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2025 Jan-Feb;140(1):67-102. doi: 10.1177/00333549241252582. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
Evidence-informed population health initiatives often leverage data from various sources, such as epidemiologic surveillance data and administrative datasets. Recent interest has arisen in using area-level composite measures describing a community's social risks to inform the development and implementation of health policies, including payment reform initiatives. Our objective was to capture the breadth of available area-level composite measures that describe social determinants of health (SDH) and have potential for application in population health and policy work.
We conducted a scoping review of the scientific literature from 2010 to 2022 to identify multifactorial indices and rankings reflected in peer-reviewed literature that estimate SDH and that have publicly accessible data sources. We discovered several additional composite measures incidental to the scoping review process. Literature searches for each composite measure aimed to contextualize common applications in public health investigations.
From 491 studies, we identified 31 composite measures and categorized them into 8 domains: environmental conditions and pollution, opportunity and infrastructure, deprivation and well-being, COVID-19, rurality, food insecurity, emergency response and community resilience, and health. Composite measures are applied most often as an independent variable associated with disparities, risk factors, and/or outcomes affecting individuals, populations, communities, and health systems.
Area-level composite measures describing SDH have been applied to wide-ranging population health work. Social risk indicators may enable policy makers, evaluators, and researchers to better assess community risks and needs, thereby facilitating the evidence-informed development, implementation, and study of initiatives that aim to improve population health.
基于证据的人群健康倡议通常利用来自各种来源的数据,如流行病学监测数据和行政数据集。最近,人们开始关注使用描述社区社会风险的区域层面综合指标,以为包括支付改革倡议在内的卫生政策的制定和实施提供信息。我们的目标是梳理出可用的区域层面综合指标的范围,这些指标描述了健康的社会决定因素(SDH),并有可能应用于人群健康和政策工作。
我们对2010年至2022年的科学文献进行了范围综述,以识别同行评审文献中反映的多因素指数和排名,这些指数和排名用于估计SDH且有公开可用的数据源。我们在范围综述过程中还发现了一些其他的综合指标。针对每个综合指标的文献检索旨在将其在公共卫生调查中的常见应用背景化。
从491项研究中,我们识别出31个综合指标,并将它们分为8个领域:环境条件与污染、机会与基础设施、贫困与福祉、新冠疫情、农村地区、粮食不安全、应急响应与社区复原力以及健康。综合指标最常作为与影响个人、人群、社区和卫生系统的差异、风险因素和/或结果相关的自变量来应用。
描述SDH的区域层面综合指标已被应用于广泛的人群健康工作。社会风险指标可能使政策制定者、评估者和研究人员能够更好地评估社区风险和需求,从而促进旨在改善人群健康的倡议的循证制定、实施和研究。