• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前入路与传统肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的随机临床试验。

Anterior Approach vs Conventional Hepatectomy for Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

now affiliated with Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):31-40. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5050.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5050
PMID:33147332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7643041/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Tumor relapse after partial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) remains an unsolved issue. Intraoperative manipulation of the liver during conventional hepatectomy might enhance hematogenous tumor cell spread. The anterior approach is an alternative approach that may reduce intraoperative tumor cell dissemination.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of the anterior approach compared with conventional hepatectomy in patients undergoing resection for CRLM.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the anterior approach compared with conventional hepatectomy in adult patients with CRLM who were scheduled for hepatectomy from February 1, 2003, to March 31, 2012, at a tertiary-care hospital. A total of 80 patients with CRLM were randomized to the anterior approach and conventional hepatectomy groups in a 1:1 ratio. Bone marrow and blood samples were analyzed for disseminated tumor cells and circulating tumor cells (CTC) using cytokeratin 20 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis. Data were analyzed from April 1 to December 1, 2018, using intention to treat.

INTERVENTIONS

Anterior approach vs conventional hepatectomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was intraoperative CTC detection in central blood samples after liver resection. Secondary end points included postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Among the 80 patients included in the analysis (48 men [60%]; mean [SD] age, 61 [10] years), baseline characteristics, including preoperative CTC detection, were comparable between both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative CTC detection between patients in the conventional hepatectomy (5 of 21 [24%]) and anterior approach (6 of 22 [27%]) groups (P = .54). Except for a longer operating time in the anterior approach group (mean [SD], 171 [53] vs 221 [53] minutes; P < .001), there were no significant differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between both study groups. Although detection of CTC was associated with poor overall (median, 46 [95% CI, 40-52] vs 81 [95% CI, 54-107] months; P = .03) and disease-free (median, 40 [95% CI, 34-46] vs 60 [95% CI, 46-74] months; P = .04) survival, there was no significant difference in overall (median, 73 [95% CI, 42-104] vs 55 [95% CI, 35-75] months; P = .43) and disease-free (median, 48 [95% CI, 40-56] vs 40 [95% CI, 28-52] months; P = .88) survival between the conventional hepatectomy and anterior approach groups. Also, there was no significant difference in patterns of recurrence between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found that the anterior approach was not superior to conventional hepatectomy in reducing intraoperative tumor cell dissemination in patients undergoing resection of CRLM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN45066244.

摘要

重要性

结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者行部分肝切除术后肿瘤复发仍是一个未解决的问题。在常规肝切除术中对肝脏的术中操作可能会增强血源性肿瘤细胞的播散。前入路是一种替代方法,可能会减少术中肿瘤细胞的扩散。

目的

确定前入路与常规肝切除术在接受 CRLM 切除术的患者中的疗效和安全性。

设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床研究评估了前入路与常规肝切除术在 2003 年 2 月 1 日至 2012 年 3 月 31 日在一家三级医院接受肝切除术的 CRLM 成年患者中的疗效和安全性。80 例 CRLM 患者按 1:1 的比例随机分为前入路组和常规肝切除术组。使用细胞角蛋白 20 逆转录-聚合酶链反应分析分析骨髓和血液样本中的播散肿瘤细胞和循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)。数据于 2018 年 4 月 1 日至 12 月 1 日采用意向治疗进行分析。

干预措施

前入路与常规肝切除术。

主要结局和测量指标

主要终点是肝切除后中央血样中术中 CTC 的检测。次要终点包括术后发病率、死亡率和长期生存。

结果

在分析的 80 例患者(48 例男性[60%];平均[标准差]年龄 61[10]岁)中,两组患者的基线特征(包括术前 CTC 检测)均无统计学差异。常规肝切除术组(21 例中有 5 例[24%])和前入路组(22 例中有 6 例[27%])患者术中 CTC 检测无统计学差异(P = .54)。除前入路组手术时间较长(平均[标准差]171[53]比 221[53]分钟;P < .001)外,两组患者术中及术后结局均无显著差异。虽然 CTC 的检测与总体生存率(中位数,46[95%CI,40-52]与 81[95%CI,54-107]个月;P = .03)和无病生存率(中位数,40[95%CI,34-46]与 60[95%CI,46-74]个月;P = .04)较差相关,但常规肝切除术组与前入路组之间的总体生存率(中位数,73[95%CI,42-104]与 55[95%CI,35-75]个月;P = .43)和无病生存率(中位数,48[95%CI,40-56]与 40[95%CI,28-52]个月;P = .88)无显著差异。此外,两组之间的复发模式也没有显著差异。

结论和相关性

这项随机临床试验发现,前入路在减少 CRLM 切除术患者术中肿瘤细胞播散方面并不优于常规肝切除术。

试验注册

isrctn.org 标识符:ISRCTN45066244。

相似文献

1
Anterior Approach vs Conventional Hepatectomy for Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.前入路与传统肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):31-40. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5050.
2
Influence of two different resection techniques (conventional liver resection versus anterior approach) of liver metastases from colorectal cancer on hematogenous tumor cell dissemination - prospective randomized multicenter trial.两种不同切除技术(传统肝切除与前入路)对结直肠癌肝转移血行肿瘤细胞播散的影响——前瞻性随机多中心试验
BMC Surg. 2008 Mar 5;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-8-6.
3
Anterior Approach to Major Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.结直肠肝转移的前方入路根治性切除术。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Nov;22(11):1928-1938. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3840-8. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
4
Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases reduces postoperative morbidity while maintaining equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to non-parenchymal-sparing resection.结直肠肝转移行部分肝切除术后的发病率低于非部分肝切除,同时保持了等效的肿瘤学结果。
Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;38:101631. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101631. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
5
Detection of hematogenous tumor cell dissemination predicts tumor relapse in patients undergoing surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases.血行性肿瘤细胞播散的检测可预测接受结直肠肝转移瘤手术切除患者的肿瘤复发。
Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):199-205. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151795.15068.27.
6
[Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy for bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases-a propensity score matching analysis].[双侧多发性结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后的长期结局——倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 25;23(10):976-983. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200414-00204.
7
Resection of colorectal liver metastases in the elderly-Is it justified?老年人大肠癌肝转移灶切除术——是否合理?
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;113(5):485-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.24188. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
The Safety and Survival Outcome of Hepatectomy with Combined Bile Duct Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.肝切除术联合胆管切除治疗结直肠癌肝转移的安全性和生存结果。
World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1231-1243. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05326-y.
9
The anterior hanging-approach improves postoperative course after right hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Results of a prospective study with propensity-score matching comparison.前路悬吊入路可改善结直肠癌肝转移患者右半肝切除术后的病程。一项倾向评分匹配比较的前瞻性研究结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;42(2):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
10
Anterior approach versus conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled study.前入路与传统入路右半肝切除术治疗大肝细胞癌:一项前瞻性随机对照研究
Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):194-203. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225095.18754.45.

引用本文的文献

1
What matters in laparoscopic hepatectomy for lesions located in posterosuperior segments? Initial experiences and analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications: a retrospective cohort study.对于位于肝后上段的病变进行腹腔镜肝切除术时,什么是重要的?术后并发症的初始经验及危险因素分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3691-3701. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11674-9. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
"Liver-loop": A case report of an alternative modified liver hanging maneuver.“肝环”:一种改良肝悬吊术替代方法的病例报告
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2025 May 31;29(2):187-191. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.24-217. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver malignancies (ROC'N'ROLL): a single-centre, randomised, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝脏恶性肿瘤(ROC'N'ROLL):一项单中心、随机、对照、单盲临床试验
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Jun 24;43:100972. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100972. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
The integrated analysis of gut microbiota and metabolome revealed steroid hormone biosynthesis is a critical pathway in liver regeneration after 2/3 partial hepatectomy.肠道微生物群和代谢组的综合分析表明,类固醇激素生物合成是2/3部分肝切除术后肝脏再生的关键途径。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1407401. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1407401. eCollection 2024.
5
Clinical efficacy of precision liver resection for primary liver cancer.精准肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):897-904. doi: 10.62347/QBBO2532. eCollection 2024.
6
KLK10 derived from tumor endothelial cells accelerates colon cancer cell proliferation and hematogenous liver metastasis formation.肿瘤内皮细胞衍生的 KLK10 加速结肠癌细胞增殖和血源性肝转移形成。
Cancer Sci. 2024 May;115(5):1520-1535. doi: 10.1111/cas.16144. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Robotic or laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy after open hepatectomy: a cohort study.开腹肝切除术后行机器人或腹腔镜再次肝切除术:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1296-1305. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10645-2. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
8
Mechanism of Metabolic Response to Hepatectomy by Integrated Analysis of Gut Microbiota, Metabolomics, and Proteomics.通过肠道微生物组学、代谢组学和蛋白质组学的综合分析探讨肝切除术后代谢反应的机制。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0206722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02067-22. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
9
Survival Study: International Multicentric Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases (SIMMILR-2).生存研究:国际多中心微创肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移(SIMMILR-2)。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;14(17):4190. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174190.
10
Perspectives on Immunotherapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.转移性结直肠癌免疫治疗的观点
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 9;11:659964. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.659964. eCollection 2021.