Suppr超能文献

火鸡有动机避免粪便污染的垫料吗?

Are Turkeys () Motivated to Avoid Excreta-Soiled Substrate?

作者信息

Monckton Valerie, van Staaveren Nienke, Baes Christine F, Balzani Agnese, Kwon Isabelle Y, McBride Peter, Harlander-Matauschek Alexandra

机构信息

Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3001 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 2;10(11):2015. doi: 10.3390/ani10112015.

Abstract

The soiling of bedding on modern turkey farms combined with turkeys' reduced ability and opportunity to perch and roost at elevation, forces them to spend most, if not all, of their time in contact with their excreta. To determine turkeys' perspective on these conditions and the value they place on unsoiled bedding vs. soiled litter (collectively, substrates), we used twenty-four eleven-week-old turkey hens divided into six two-compartment pens. In the "home" compartment (H), we placed soiled wood shavings, while the "treatment" compartment (T) contained no substrate (NS), fresh pine and spruce wood shavings (FP), soiled pine and spruce wood shavings (SP), ammonia reductant-treated soiled pine and spruce wood shavings (TSP), or a feed treatment. One-way push-doors separated the two compartments. The door leading to T weighed an additional 0%, 20% or 40% of the turkeys' body weight while the door to H remained unweighted. All birds were exposed to each resource and door weight combination in a systematic order. We measured the turkeys' motivation based on the number of birds that pushed the maximum weight to access each resource, the amount of time spent in T, and the number of visits to T. Our findings show that turkeys worked harder to access feed compared to all the floor substrate treatments. Additionally, they were equally motivated to access all the substrate treatments.

摘要

现代火鸡养殖场中垫料的污染,再加上火鸡在高处栖息和栖息的能力及机会降低,迫使它们即使不是全部时间,也大部分时间都与排泄物接触。为了确定火鸡对这些条件的看法以及它们对未污染垫料与污染垫料(统称为基质)的重视程度,我们使用了24只11周龄的母火鸡,将它们分成6个两隔间围栏。在“家”隔间(H)中,我们放置了污染的木屑,而“处理”隔间(T)没有基质(NS)、新鲜的松树和云杉木屑(FP)、污染的松树和云杉木屑(SP)、氨还原剂处理过的污染松树和云杉木屑(TSP),或者一种饲料处理。单向推门将两个隔间隔开。通往T的门重量额外增加了火鸡体重的0%、20%或40%,而通往H的门没有加重。所有的火鸡都按照系统的顺序接触每种资源和门的重量组合。我们根据推开最大重量以获取每种资源的火鸡数量、在T中花费的时间以及对T的访问次数来衡量火鸡的积极性。我们的研究结果表明,与所有地面基质处理相比,火鸡获取饲料时更加努力。此外,它们获取所有基质处理的积极性是一样的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d1e/7692265/9e358469c72f/animals-10-02015-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验