• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下腰椎穿刺的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy of ultrasound guidance for lumbar punctures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Shu LiPei, Huang Jiao, Liu Jing Chen

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nannig, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nannig, China

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2021 Jan;97(1143):40-47. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138238. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138238
PMID:33148780
Abstract

Ultrasound guidance has been reported to facilitate the performance of lumbar punctures (LPs). However, the use of ultrasound guidance has not yet received consistent conclusions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided LPs. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing ultrasound guidance with traditional palpation for LPs in adults. The primary outcome was risk of failed procedures. A random-effects Mantel-Haenzsel model or random-effects inverse variance model was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs. Twenty-eight trials (N=2813) met the inclusion criteria. Ultrasound-guided LPs were associated with a reduced risk of failed procedures (RR=0.58, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.85, p=0.005). No significant heterogeneity was detected (I2=27%) among these trials. It further decreased first attempt to failure (RR=0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.62, p<0.00001), mean attempts to success (SMD=-0.61, 95% CI -0.80 to -0.43, p=0.00001) and incidences of complications of headache and backache (RR=0.63, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.85, p=0.003). Ultrasound guidance is an effective technique for LPs in adults.

摘要

据报道,超声引导有助于腰椎穿刺(LP)的操作。然而,超声引导的使用尚未得到一致的结论。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定超声引导下腰椎穿刺的疗效。检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,查找比较超声引导与传统触诊法对成人进行腰椎穿刺的随机对照试验。主要结局是操作失败的风险。采用随机效应的Mantel-Haenzsel模型或随机效应逆方差模型计算相对风险(RRs)或标准化均数差(SMDs)及95%可信区间(CIs)。28项试验(N = 2813)符合纳入标准。超声引导下腰椎穿刺与操作失败风险降低相关(RR = 0.58,95%CI 0.39至0.85,p = 0.005)。在这些试验中未检测到显著异质性(I² = 27%)。它还进一步降低了首次尝试失败的风险(RR = 0.43,95%CI 0.30至0.62,p < 0.00001)、平均成功尝试次数(SMD = -0.61,95%CI -0.80至-0.43,p = 0.00001)以及头痛和背痛并发症的发生率(RR = 0.63,95%CI 0.46至0.85,p = 0.003)。超声引导是成人腰椎穿刺的一种有效技术。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of ultrasound guidance for lumbar punctures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.超声引导下腰椎穿刺的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Postgrad Med J. 2021 Jan;97(1143):40-47. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138238. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
2
Comparative efficacy of ultrasound guidance or conventional anatomical landmarks for neuraxial puncture in adult patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.超声引导与传统解剖标志用于成年患者神经轴突穿刺的比较疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Br J Anaesth. 2024 May;132(5):1097-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
3
Ultrasound-assisted Lumbar Punctures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声引导下腰椎穿刺术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;26(1):85-96. doi: 10.1111/acem.13558. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Comparison of ultrasound-guided and traditional localisation in intraspinal anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.超声引导与传统定位在椎管内麻醉中的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 2;13(11):e071253. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071253.
5
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超声引导下桡动脉置管的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2014 May 8;18(3):R93. doi: 10.1186/cc13862.
6
Ultrasound Guidance Facilitates Radial Artery Catheterization: A Meta-analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.超声引导有助于桡动脉置管:随机对照试验的荟萃分析与试验序贯分析。
Chest. 2016 Jan;149(1):166-79. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-1784. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
7
Conventional landmark palpation versus preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial procedures in nonobstetric patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.非产科患者神经轴阻滞操作中传统体表标志触诊与术前超声检查的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Aug 1;38(Suppl 2):S73-S86. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001525.
8
Ultrasound imaging for lumbar punctures and epidural catheterisations: systematic review and meta-analysis.超声引导下腰椎穿刺和硬膜外导管置管术的影像学研究:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 26;346:f1720. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1720.
9
Topical anaesthesia for needle-related pain in newborn infants.新生儿针头相关疼痛的局部麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 4;2(2):CD010331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010331.pub2.
10
Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.桡动脉置管的超声引导:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e111527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111527. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-time Ultrasound-guided Lumbar Puncture: A Comparison of Two Techniques Using Simulation.实时超声引导下腰椎穿刺:两种模拟技术的比较
West J Emerg Med. 2025 May 20;26(3):737-742. doi: 10.5811/westjem.21163.
2
'UltraGUD LP'-ultrasound guided diagnostic LP-a randomizedcontrolled trial. Traditional landmark based lumbar puncture is as effective as ultrasound guided lumbar puncture in outpatient neurology settings.“超引导下诊断性腰椎穿刺(UltraGUD LP)”——一项随机对照试验。在门诊神经科环境中,传统的基于体表标志的腰椎穿刺与超声引导下腰椎穿刺效果相同。
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 10;16:1521783. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1521783. eCollection 2025.
3
Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Multimodal Tool for the Management of Sepsis in the Emergency Department.
即时超声:急诊科脓毒症管理的多模态工具。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 20;59(6):1180. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061180.
4
Embolisation of iatrogenic lumbar artery bleed causing psoas haematoma following elective lumbar puncture.选择性腰椎穿刺后医源性腰动脉出血导致腰大肌血肿的栓塞治疗。
BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Nov 1;15(11):e251419. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-251419.