Karunakaran Jeyaraman Venkataraman, Kaliyaperumal Anbarasi, Nagappan Ragavendran, Swaminathan Senthil Kumar, Arthanari Kaneesh Karthik, Sujith Samuel Leo
Department of Conservative Dentistry, JKK Nataraja Dental College & Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamilnadu, India.
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S601-S606. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_212_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
The aim of this study was to analyze root form and morphology of human maxillary first permanent premolars of an Indo-Dravidian population from southern India.
Eight hundred and twenty-two maxillary first permanent premolars were cleansed and stored appropriately. Morphology and root form analysed, segregated into Groups (Gps): Gp I, Gp II, and Gp III, and later divided into subgroups (SGs) based on specific criteria. Gp I was divided into two SGs: SG A (minimal or absence of grooving in the root) ( = 252) and SG B (clear and defined longitudinal groove in the root) ( = 104), and Gp II was divided into SG C (roots dividing in coronal one-third) ( = 154), SG D (roots dividing in the middle one-third) ( = 158), and SG E (roots dividing in the apical one third) ( = 138). Gp III consisted of only one SG F (teeth with three roots) ( = 16). The groups were analyzed separately, their external root form and morphology were recorded. Root form was analyzed, and results were tabulated. This study was compared with other studies and statistically analyzed.
Gp II was common with an incidence of 54.74%. Gp I was the next most common with an incidence of 43.3%. Gp III was the least common with an incidence of 1.94%. The number and distribution of roots was also computed. Six types of root form were identified (Type [Ty] A = 30.65%, Ty B = 12.65%, Ty C = 18.73%, Ty D = 19.22%, Ty E = 16.78%, and Ty F = 1.94%).
Awareness and assessment of root form, number preoperatively with regard to specific populations before initiation will pave way for successful outcome of therapy.
本研究旨在分析来自印度南部的印度-德拉威人群上颌第一恒前磨牙的牙根形态。
822颗上颌第一恒前磨牙经清洁并妥善保存。分析其形态和牙根形态,分为组(Gps):I组、II组和III组,随后根据特定标准分为亚组(SGs)。I组分为两个亚组:A亚组(牙根上有轻微沟纹或无沟纹)(=252颗)和B亚组(牙根上有清晰明确的纵向沟纹)(=104颗),II组分为C亚组(牙根在冠方三分之一处分开)(=154颗)、D亚组(牙根在中间三分之一处分开)(=158颗)和E亚组(牙根在根尖三分之一处分开)(=138颗)。III组仅包含一个F亚组(有三根的牙齿)(=16颗)。分别对各组进行分析,记录其牙根外部形态和形态。分析牙根形态,并将结果制成表格。本研究与其他研究进行比较并进行统计学分析。
II组最为常见,发生率为54.74%。I组次之,发生率为43.3%。III组最不常见,发生率为1.94%。还计算了牙根的数量和分布。确定了六种牙根形态类型(A类型[A=30.65%,B类型=12.65%,C类型=18.73%,D类型=19.22%,E类型=16.78%,F类型=1.94%])。
在开始治疗前,针对特定人群术前了解和评估牙根形态、数量,将为治疗的成功结果铺平道路。