Chowdhry Amit K, Chowdhry Divya N, Shayne Michelle, Milano Michael T
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 647, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep 20;27:100551. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100551. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Male patients with breast cancer (BrC) have increased risk of developing 2nd-primary BrC (2nd-BrC). Given the relative rarity of male BrC, population-based registries are needed to analyze overall survival (OS) outcomes for these patients.
Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry of patients diagnosed from 1975 to 2016, a cohort study of men whose only malignancy was BrC (BrC-O; = 6,475), and men who developed 2nd-BrC after initial BrC diagnosis (BrC-2; = 85) was performed. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 2nd-BrC, Kaplan-Meier OS and multivariable Cox regression modelling were performed.
The SIR for 2nd-BrC was 32.95 (95%CI:[23.85-44.38], < 0.05). The majority (88%) of 2nd-BrC for BrC-2 were contralateral from 1st-BrC; suggesting the unlikeliness of miscoding local recurrences as 2nd-BrC for most patients. There was no statistically significant difference between rates of hormone (reported in 44%) or HER-2 (reported in 33%) receptor status between BrC-O and BrC-2, albeit with limited data. The 2nd-BrC for BrC-2 was significantly more likely to be localized or distant stage (rather than regional) than BrC-O. Median OS was 103 months (95% CI: [99, 108]) for BrC-O and 62 months (95% CI [49, 128] after 2nd-BrC. When sub-grouped by BrC stage, and when analyzed by Cox regression, there was no significant difference in OS between BrC-O and BrC-2.
Patients with male BrC are at significantly increased risk of 2nd BrC, but they can expect similar post-BrC prognosis (versus those without 2nd-BrC), after adjusting for patient demographics and tumor characteristics known to affect OS.
None.
男性乳腺癌(BrC)患者发生第二原发性乳腺癌(2nd-BrC)的风险增加。鉴于男性BrC相对罕见,需要基于人群的登记系统来分析这些患者的总生存期(OS)结局。
利用监测、流行病学和最终结果登记系统中1975年至2016年诊断的患者数据,对仅患有BrC的男性(BrC-O;n = 6475)和初次BrC诊断后发生2nd-BrC的男性(BrC-2;n = 85)进行队列研究。进行了2nd-BrC的标准化发病率比(SIR)、Kaplan-Meier OS分析和多变量Cox回归建模。
2nd-BrC的SIR为32.95(95%CI:[23.85 - 44.38],P < 0.05)。BrC-2中2nd-BrC的大多数(88%)与第一原发性BrC位于对侧;这表明对于大多数患者,将局部复发误编码为2nd-BrC的可能性不大。BrC-O和BrC-2之间激素(报告率为44%)或HER-2(报告率为33%)受体状态的发生率无统计学显著差异,尽管数据有限。与BrC-O相比,BrC-2的2nd-BrC更有可能处于局限性或远处阶段(而非区域阶段)。BrC-O的中位OS为103个月(95%CI:[99, 108]),2nd-BrC后的中位OS为62个月(95%CI [49, 128])。按BrC分期分组并通过Cox回归分析时,BrC-O和BrC-2之间的OS无显著差异。
男性BrC患者发生2nd BrC的风险显著增加,但在调整已知影响OS的患者人口统计学和肿瘤特征后,他们的BrC后预后与未发生2nd-BrC的患者相似。
无。