• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣置换术的发病率和死亡率趋势:回顾性、观察性、单中心研究。

Trend in morbidity and mortality in surgical aortic valve replacement: a retrospective, observational, single-centre study.

机构信息

Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Dec 7;31(6):796-802. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa189.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivaa189
PMID:33150396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7723024/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Continuous improvement in the management of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) may have considerably enhanced surgical outcomes including in-hospital mortality and perioperative complications. We aimed to analyse in-hospital mortality and morbidity trends in patients undergoing SAVR in a single centre to provide insights for future benchmarking for transcatheter aortic valve implantation indications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from patients undergoing either isolated SAVR or combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at the Bristol Heart Institute, UK, from January 2000 to December 2017. Baseline characteristics were extracted and analysed across 3 different eras (2000-2005, 2006-2011 and 2012-2017). Risk-adjusted time trend was obtained from univariate and multivariate logistic regression including all baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 2719 patients (63.2%) underwent isolated SAVR, and 1581 (36.8%) underwent combined CABG and SAVR during the study period. For patients undergoing SAVR, in-hospital mortality decreased from 2.9% in 2000-2005 to 0.7% in 2012-2017 (risk-adjusted time trend 0.0001). Hospital mortality in patients aged 75-79 and ≥80 years decreased from 5.6% and 5.3% to 0.4% and 2.2%, respectively. Mortality after combined SAVR and CABG did not significantly decrease (from 3.9% in 2000-2005 to 3.5% in 2012-2017; risk-adjusted time trend = 0.62). However, in patients aged ≥80 years, index hospitalization mortality showed a decreasing non-significant trend from 9.8% to 4.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the hypothesis that mortality and morbidity rates following SAVR have significantly improved over the years, including for patients at high risk.

摘要

目的

主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)患者管理的持续改进可能显著改善手术结果,包括住院死亡率和围手术期并发症。我们旨在分析单一中心 SAVR 患者的住院死亡率和发病率趋势,为经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的适应证提供未来基准的参考。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,对英国布里斯托尔心脏研究所 2000 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受单纯 SAVR 或 SAVR 联合冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者前瞻性收集的数据进行分析。提取基线特征,并根据 3 个不同时期(2000-2005 年、2006-2011 年和 2012-2017 年)进行分析。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析所有基线特征,获得风险调整的时间趋势。

结果

在研究期间,共有 2719 例(63.2%)患者接受单纯 SAVR,1581 例(36.8%)患者接受 SAVR 联合 CABG。对于接受 SAVR 的患者,住院死亡率从 2000-2005 年的 2.9%下降至 2012-2017 年的 0.7%(风险调整的时间趋势为 0.0001)。75-79 岁和≥80 岁患者的住院死亡率从 5.6%和 5.3%分别下降至 0.4%和 2.2%。SAVR 联合 CABG 后的死亡率没有显著下降(从 2000-2005 年的 3.9%降至 2012-2017 年的 3.5%;风险调整时间趋势=0.62)。然而,≥80 岁患者的指数住院死亡率从 9.8%降至 4.8%,呈下降趋势,但无统计学意义。

结论

我们的研究结果支持以下假设,即 SAVR 后的死亡率和发病率多年来显著改善,包括高危患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05b1/7723024/ffba2e75f700/ivaa189f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05b1/7723024/ffba2e75f700/ivaa189f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05b1/7723024/ffba2e75f700/ivaa189f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Trend in morbidity and mortality in surgical aortic valve replacement: a retrospective, observational, single-centre study.主动脉瓣置换术的发病率和死亡率趋势:回顾性、观察性、单中心研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Dec 7;31(6):796-802. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa189.
2
Comparison of Short and Mid-Term Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (Intermediate/High Risk) Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.对比行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(中危/高危)患者的短期及中期死亡率和发病率。
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Apr 15;23(2):E212-E220. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2913.
3
Surgical aortic valve replacement in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a review of the UK national database.经导管主动脉瓣植入术时代的主动脉瓣置换术:英国国家数据库回顾。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 28;11(10):e046491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046491.
4
Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.退伍军人事务医疗系统中接受经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗的中度风险患者的结局:单中心20年经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):390-398. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27478. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
5
Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术联合外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣置换术的结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 15;137:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.040. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Changes in Risk Profile and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement From the Pre- to Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Eras.从经导管主动脉瓣置换术前到术后时代,接受外科主动脉瓣置换术患者的风险状况和结局变化。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.083. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术- 主动脉瓣介入治疗中合并严重冠状动脉疾病患者的管理:杂交手术中经导管与外科手术方法的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 May 14;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1087-2.
8
The impact of coronary artery bypass grafting added to aortic valve replacement on long-term outcomes in octogenarian patients: a reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术联合主动脉瓣置换术对 80 岁以上患者长期预后的影响:重建时间事件荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jul 9;35(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac164.
9
The impact of mitral stenosis on outcomes of aortic valve stenosis patient undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.二尖瓣狭窄对接受外科主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):655-660. doi: 10.1111/joic.12519. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Association of Hospital Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Quality With 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.医院外科主动脉瓣置换质量与经导管主动脉瓣置换后 30 天和 1 年死亡率的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jan 1;4(1):16-22. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4051.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial surgery versus conservative management of chronic severe aortic regurgitation in mild symptomatic older patients.轻度症状老年患者慢性重度主动脉瓣反流的初始手术与保守治疗
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 May 14;59:101698. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101698. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Cost of illness of Heart Valve Diseases (HVDs): A real-world analysis in Italy.心脏瓣膜疾病(HVDs)的疾病成本:意大利的一项真实世界分析。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2025 Feb 19;12:34-42. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2025.3243. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Operation in the gray zone: is SAVR still useful in patients aged between 75 and 80 years?

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of a Complete Percutaneous Versus Surgical Approach to Aortic Valve Replacement and Revascularization in Patients at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the Randomized SURTAVI Trial.中度手术风险患者经皮完全主动脉瓣置换与手术主动脉瓣置换及血运重建的比较:随机SURTAVI试验结果
Circulation. 2019 Oct 15;140(16):1296-1305. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039564. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术- 主动脉瓣介入治疗中合并严重冠状动脉疾病患者的管理:杂交手术中经导管与外科手术方法的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 May 14;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1087-2.
3
灰色地带的手术:75至80岁患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术是否仍有价值?
Future Cardiol. 2024 Dec-Dec;20(15-16):849-858. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2433827. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
4
Clinical Outcomes after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in 681 Octogenarians: A Single-Center Real-World Experience Comparing the Old Patients with the Very Old Patients.681名八旬老人行主动脉瓣置换术后的临床结局:一项单中心真实世界经验,比较老年患者与高龄患者。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Apr 1;9(2):44. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9020044.
5
Association Between Type 2 Diabetes and Changes in Myocardial Structure, Contractile Function, Energetics, and Blood Flow Before and After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.2 型糖尿病与严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣置换前后心肌结构、收缩功能、能量代谢和血流变化的关系。
Circulation. 2023 Oct 10;148(15):1138-1153. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063444. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
Referral of Patients for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement before and after Introduction of the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Changing Patterns of Preoperative Characteristics and Volume and Postoperative Outcome.经导管主动脉瓣植入术引入前后接受外科主动脉瓣置换术患者的转诊——术前特征、手术量及术后结果的变化模式
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 May 22;10(5):223. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10050223.
7
The early and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting added to aortic valve replacement compared to isolated aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术联合主动脉瓣置换术与单纯主动脉瓣置换术治疗老年患者的早期和长期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Oct;37(10):1647-1661. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02073-4. Epub 2022 May 9.
8
The impact of surgical training on early and long-term outcomes after isolated aortic valve surgery.外科手术训练对单纯主动脉瓣手术早期和长期结局的影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 27;61(1):180-186. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab328.
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
4
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
5
Transcatheter or surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: A comparative analysis from the Italian OBSERVANT study.经导管或手术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄合并冠状动脉疾病:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 研究的对比分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
6
Long-term survival after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of observational comparative studies with a propensity-score analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄后的长期生存率:一项倾向评分分析的观察性比较研究的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):419-430. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27521. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):616-664. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx324.
8
2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会对2014年《美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南》的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2017 Jun 20;135(25):e1159-e1195. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000503. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
Trends in aortic valve replacement in Germany in 2015: transcatheter versus isolated surgical aortic valve repair.2015年德国主动脉瓣置换术的趋势:经导管与单纯外科主动脉瓣修复术对比
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jun;106(6):411-419. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1070-1. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.