Suppr超能文献

比较巴西肠炎沙门氏菌血清型肠炎和都柏林沙门氏菌的细胞侵袭、巨噬细胞存活和炎症细胞因子谱。

Comparison of cell invasion, macrophage survival and inflammatory cytokines profiles between Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Dublin from Brazil.

机构信息

Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto - USP, Departamento de Análises Clínicas, Toxicológicas e Bromatológicas, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Instituto Adolfo Lutz - Centro de Laboratórios Regionais - Ribeirão Preto VI, Laboratório de Microbiologia de Alimentos, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Jun;130(6):2123-2131. doi: 10.1111/jam.14924. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

Abstract

AIMS

This study compared the capacity of strains of Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Dublin isolated in Brazil to invade epithelial cells, to be internalized by and survive within macrophages, and to stimulate cytokine release in vitro.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both serovars infected 75 and 73% Caco-2 (human) and MDBK (bovine) epithelial cells respectively. Salmonella Dublin and S. Enteritidis (i) were internalized at the respective rates of 79·6 and 65·0% (P ≤ 0·05) by U937 (human) macrophages, and 70·4 and 66·9% by HD11 (chicken) macrophages; and (ii) multiplied at the respective rates of 3·2- and 2·7-fold within U937 cells, and 1·9- and 1·1-fold (P ≤ 0·05) within HD11 cells respectively. Seventy per cent of 10 S. Dublin strains stimulated IL-8 production, while 70% of S. Enteritidis strains enhanced production of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70 and TNF in Caco-2 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with S. Enteritidis, S. Dublin had stronger ability to survive within macrophages and induced weak cytokine production, which may explain the higher incidence of invasive diseases caused by S. Dublin in humans.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This study compared S. enterica serovars Enteritidis and Dublin to provide comparative data about the profile of the two serovars in cells from humans, the common host and their respective natural animal hosts and vice versa in order to check the differences between these two phylogenetically closely related serovars that share antigenic properties but present different phenotypic behaviours.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了巴西分离的肠炎沙门氏菌和都柏林沙门氏菌血清型菌株侵袭上皮细胞、被巨噬细胞内化和存活以及体外刺激细胞因子释放的能力。

方法和结果

两种血清型均分别感染了 75%和 73%的 Caco-2(人)和 MDBK(牛)上皮细胞。沙门氏菌都柏林和肠炎沙门氏菌(i)被 U937(人)巨噬细胞内化的比率分别为 79.6%和 65.0%(P≤0.05),被 HD11(鸡)巨噬细胞内化的比率分别为 70.4%和 66.9%;(ii)在 U937 细胞内分别增殖 3.2-和 2.7 倍,在 HD11 细胞内分别增殖 1.9-和 1.1 倍(P≤0.05)。10 株沙门氏菌都柏林株中有 70%刺激 IL-8 的产生,而 70%的肠炎沙门氏菌株增强了 Caco-2 细胞中 IL-1β、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、IL-12p70 和 TNF 的产生。

结论

与肠炎沙门氏菌相比,都柏林沙门氏菌在巨噬细胞内的存活能力更强,诱导细胞因子产生较弱,这可能解释了都柏林沙门氏菌在人类中引起侵袭性疾病的发病率较高的原因。

研究的意义和影响

本研究比较了肠炎沙门氏菌和都柏林沙门氏菌,为这两种血清型在人、共同宿主的细胞中以及它们各自的天然动物宿主中的表型提供了比较数据,反之亦然,以检查这两种在进化上密切相关但具有不同表型行为的血清型之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验