• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非目标物种会光顾针对小型猎物的饲料器和饮水槽吗?来自西班牙农田的一项使用相机陷阱的研究。

Do non-target species visit feeders and water troughs targeting small game? A study from farmland Spain using camera-trapping.

机构信息

Department of Animal Production, Research Group on Game Species Breeding and Management, University of León, León, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC, CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.

出版信息

Integr Zool. 2021 Mar;16(2):226-239. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12496. Epub 2020 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1111/1749-4877.12496
PMID:33150697
Abstract

Provision of food and water is a widespread tool implemented around the world for the benefit of game and other wildlife, but factors affecting the use of food and water by non-target species are poorly known. We evaluated visits to feeders and water troughs by non-game species using camera-traps in two separate areas of Spain. Feeders and water troughs were either "protected" (when surrounded by more than 50% of shrubs/forest) or "open" (in the opposite case). A total of 18 948 photos from 5344 camera-trapping days depicted animals, and 75 species were identified. Feeders and water troughs were visited by target species (partridges and lagomorphs, 55.3% of visits) and non-target species (44.7% of visits). Among the latter, corvids were the most common (46.1% of visits), followed by rodents (26.8%), other birds (23.6%, mainly passerines), columbids (1.9%), and other species at minor percentages. The highest proportion of visiting days to feeders and water troughs was from corvids (0.173) followed by other-birds (0.109) and rodents (0.083); the lowest proportion was recorded for columbids (0.016). Use intensity and visit frequency of water troughs tripled that recorded in feeders, and visits to open feeders/troughs were approximately twice those to protected ones. In summary: feeders and water troughs targeting small game species are also used regularly by non-target ones; they should be set close to cover to optimize their use by non-target species that are not competitors of target species (though corvids may visit them); water availability should be prioritized where drought periods are expected.

摘要

提供食物和水是一种在全球范围内广泛使用的工具,旨在造福猎物和其他野生动物,但对于非目标物种使用食物和水的影响因素知之甚少。我们使用相机陷阱在西班牙的两个不同地区评估了非猎物物种对喂食器和饮水槽的访问情况。喂食器和饮水槽要么是“受保护的”(当它们被超过 50%的灌木/森林包围时),要么是“开放的”(在相反的情况下)。总共 5344 天的相机陷阱拍摄了 18948 张照片,其中有 75 种动物被识别出来。喂食器和饮水槽被目标物种(鹧鸪和兔形目动物,占访问量的 55.3%)和非目标物种(占访问量的 44.7%)访问。在后者中,鸦科动物最为常见(占访问量的 46.1%),其次是啮齿动物(占 26.8%)、其他鸟类(主要是雀形目,占 23.6%)、鸽形目(占 1.9%)和其他占比较小的物种。访问喂食器和饮水槽的天数中,鸦科动物的比例最高(0.173),其次是其他鸟类(0.109)和啮齿动物(0.083);记录到的鸽形目动物的比例最低(0.016)。与喂食器相比,饮水槽的使用强度和访问频率增加了两倍,而开放的喂食器/饮水槽的访问量约为受保护的喂食器/饮水槽的两倍。总之:针对小型猎物物种的喂食器和饮水槽也经常被非目标物种使用;它们应该设置在靠近掩护物的地方,以优化非目标物种的使用,而这些非目标物种不是目标物种的竞争者(尽管鸦科动物可能会访问它们);在预期干旱时期,应优先考虑水的供应。

相似文献

1
Do non-target species visit feeders and water troughs targeting small game? A study from farmland Spain using camera-trapping.非目标物种会光顾针对小型猎物的饲料器和饮水槽吗?来自西班牙农田的一项使用相机陷阱的研究。
Integr Zool. 2021 Mar;16(2):226-239. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12496. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
2
Spatial and temporal interactions between livestock and wildlife in South Central Spain assessed by camera traps.利用相机陷阱评估西班牙中南部家畜和野生动物的时空相互作用。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
3
Artificial Water Troughs Use by the Mountain Ungulate (Cyprus Mouflon) at Pafos Forest.帕福斯森林山地有蹄类动物(塞浦路斯盘羊)对人工水槽的使用情况
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;12(21):3060. doi: 10.3390/ani12213060.
4
Supplementing non-target taxa: bird feeding alters the local distribution of mammals.补充非目标类群:鸟类取食改变了哺乳动物的局部分布。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Apr;28(3):761-770. doi: 10.1002/eap.1683. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
5
Wildlife Presence and Interactions with Chickens on Australian Commercial Chicken Farms Assessed by Camera Traps.利用相机陷阱评估澳大利亚商业养鸡场中野生动物的存在情况及其与鸡的互动。
Avian Dis. 2018 Mar;62(1):65-72. doi: 10.1637/11761-101917-Reg.1.
6
Use of water troughs by badgers and cattle.獾和牛对水槽的使用情况。
Vet J. 2014 Dec;202(3):628-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
7
Colour preferences of UK garden birds at supplementary seed feeders.英国花园鸟类对补充性种子喂食器的颜色偏好
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 17;12(2):e0172422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172422. eCollection 2017.
8
Number of hummingbird visits determines flower mite abundance on hummingbird feeders.蜂鸟光顾的次数决定了蜂鸟喂食器上花螨的数量。
Exp Appl Acarol. 2016 Aug;69(4):403-11. doi: 10.1007/s10493-016-0047-0. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
9
The relationship between meal composition and long-term diet choice.膳食组成与长期饮食选择之间的关系。
J Anim Sci. 2002 Dec;80(12):3165-78. doi: 10.2527/2002.80123165x.
10
Camera trap placement and the potential for bias due to trails and other features.相机陷阱的设置以及由于痕迹和其他特征而导致的偏差的可能性。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0186679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186679. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Habitat Use of Birds on a High-Mounted Agrivoltaic Trial Plot.高架农光试验田上鸟类的栖息地利用情况
Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 14;15(8):e71864. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71864. eCollection 2025 Aug.