Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven.
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences and Imec-ITEC, KU Leuven.
Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;147(1):55-94. doi: 10.1037/bul0000308. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
We investigate the relationship of morality and political orientation by focusing on the influential results showing that liberals and conservatives rely on different moral foundations. We conducted a comprehensive literature search from major databases and other sources for primary studies that used the Moral Foundations Questionnaire and a typical measure of political orientation, a political self-placement item. We used a predefined process for independent extraction of effect sizes by two authors and ran both study-level and individual-level analyses. With 89 samples, 605 effect sizes, and 33,804 independent participants, in addition to 192,870 participants from the widely used YourMorals.org website, the basic differences about conservatives and liberals are supported. Yet, heterogeneity is moderate, and the results may be less generalizable across samples and political cultures than previously thought. The effect sizes obtained from the YourMorals.org data appear inflated compared with independent samples, which is partly related to political interest and may be because of self-selection. The association of moral foundations to political orientation varies culturally (between regions and countries) and subculturally (between White and Black respondents and in response to political interest). The associations also differ depending on the choice of the social or economic dimension and its labeling, supporting both the bidimensional model of political orientation and the findings that the dimensions are often strongly correlated. Our findings have implications for interpreting published studies, as well as designing new ones where the political aspect of morality is relevant. The results are primarily limited by the validity of the measures and the homogeneity of the included studies in terms of sample origins. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
我们通过关注有影响力的研究结果来研究道德和政治倾向之间的关系,这些研究结果表明自由派和保守派依赖于不同的道德基础。我们从主要数据库和其他来源进行了全面的文献搜索,以寻找使用道德基础问卷和典型政治倾向测量方法(政治自我定位项目)的主要研究。我们使用了由两位作者独立提取效应大小的预定义过程,并进行了研究水平和个体水平的分析。在 89 个样本、605 个效应大小和 33804 个独立参与者中,加上来自广泛使用的 YourMorals.org 网站的 192870 名参与者,支持了保守派和自由派之间的基本差异。然而,异质性是中等的,与之前的想法相比,结果可能在样本和政治文化方面的概括性较差。与独立样本相比,从 YourMorals.org 数据中获得的效应大小似乎偏高,这部分与政治兴趣有关,可能是因为自我选择。道德基础与政治倾向的关联在文化上(在地区和国家之间)和亚文化上(在白人和黑人受访者之间以及对政治兴趣的反应中)存在差异。关联也因社会或经济维度及其标签的选择而异,支持政治倾向的双维度模型以及这些维度通常密切相关的发现。我们的研究结果对解释已发表的研究以及设计新的研究具有意义,这些研究涉及道德的政治方面。结果主要受到测量的有效性和纳入研究在样本来源方面的同质性的限制。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。