Suppr超能文献

不同类型团队初级保健模式下的糖尿病医疗流程和结果。

Processes and outcomes of diabetes mellitus care by different types of team primary care models.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241516. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Team care improves processes and outcomes of care, especially for patients with complex medical conditions that require coordination of care. This study aimed to compare the processes and outcomes of care provided to older patients with diabetes by primary care teams comprised of only primary care physicians (PCPs) versus team care that included nurse practitioners (NPs) or physician assistants (PAs).

METHODS

We studied 3,524 primary care practices identified via social network analysis and 306,741 patients ≥66 years old diagnosed with diabetes in or before 2015 in Medicare data. Guideline-recommended diabetes care included eye examination, hemoglobin A1c test, and nephropathy monitoring. High-risk medications were based on recommendations from the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. Preventable hospitalizations were defined as hospitalizations for a potentially preventable condition.

RESULTS

Compared with patients in the PCP only teams, patients in the team care practices with NPs or PAs received more guideline-recommended diabetes care (annual eye exam: adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00-1.08), 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03-1.13), and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05-1.15), and HbA1C test: aOR: 1.11 (95% CI: 1.04-1.18), 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02-1.20), and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.06-1.25) for PCP/NP, PCP/NP/PA, and PCP/PA teams). Patients in the PCP/NP and the PCP/PA teams had a slightly higher likelihood of being prescribed high-risk medications (aOR: 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00-1.07), and 1.06 (95% CI: 1.02-1.11), respectively). The likelihood of preventable hospitalizations was similar among patients cared for by various types of practices.

CONCLUSION

The team care practices with NPs or PAs were associated with better adherence to clinical practice guideline recommendations for diabetes compared to PCP only practices. Both practices had similar outcomes. Further efforts are needed to explore new and cost-effective team-based care delivery models that improve process, outcomes, and continuity of care, as well as patient care experiences.

摘要

背景

团队护理可改善医疗服务流程和结果,尤其适用于需要协调护理的患有复杂医疗状况的患者。本研究旨在比较仅由初级保健医生(PCP)组成的初级保健团队与包括护士从业者(NP)或医师助理(PA)的团队护理为老年糖尿病患者提供的护理流程和结果。

方法

我们通过社交网络分析确定了 3524 个初级保健实践,并在 Medicare 数据中研究了 306741 名 66 岁及以上被诊断患有糖尿病的患者。指南推荐的糖尿病护理包括眼部检查、糖化血红蛋白测试和肾病监测。高危药物基于美国老年医学会老年人潜在不适当药物使用 Beers 标准的建议。可预防性住院是指因潜在可预防的疾病而住院。

结果

与仅由 PCP 组成的团队中的患者相比,在 NP 或 PA 参与的团队护理实践中,患者接受了更多的糖尿病护理指南推荐(年度眼部检查:调整后的优势比(aOR):1.04(95%CI:1.00-1.08)、1.08(95%CI:1.03-1.13)和 1.10(95%CI:1.05-1.15),以及糖化血红蛋白测试:aOR:1.11(95%CI:1.04-1.18)、1.11(95%CI:1.02-1.20)和 1.15(95%CI:1.06-1.25),用于 PCP/NP、PCP/NP/PA 和 PCP/PA 团队)。PCP/NP 和 PCP/PA 团队的患者开具高危药物的可能性略高(aOR:1.03(95%CI:1.00-1.07)和 1.06(95%CI:1.02-1.11))。不同类型实践中患者发生可预防性住院的可能性相似。

结论

与仅由 PCP 组成的实践相比,NP 或 PA 参与的团队护理实践与更好地遵循糖尿病临床实践指南建议相关。两种实践的结果相似。需要进一步努力探索新的、具有成本效益的基于团队的护理交付模式,以改善流程、结果和护理连续性以及患者护理体验。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.为初级保健提供者缩写。
Clin Diabetes. 2019 Jan;37(1):11-34. doi: 10.2337/cd18-0105.
4
12. Older Adults: .12. 老年人: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S139-S147. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验