Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division for Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1781-1787. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5824.
A physician's prior experience caring for a patient may be associated with patient outcomes and care patterns during and after hospitalization.
To examine differences in the use of health care resources and outcomes among hospitalized patients cared for by hospitalists, their own primary care physicians (PCPs), or other generalists.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective study analyzed admissions for the 20 most common medical diagnoses among elderly fee-for-service Medicare patients from January 1 through December 31, 2013. Patients had at least 1 previous encounter with an outpatient clinician within the 365 days before admission, and diagnoses were restricted to the 20 most common diagnosis related groups. Data were collected from Medicare Parts A and B claims data, and outcomes were analyzed from January 1, 2013, through January 31, 2014.
Physician types included hospitalists, PCPs (ie, the physicians who provided a plurality of ambulatory visits in the year preceding admission), or generalists (not the patients' PCPs).
Number of in-hospital specialist consultations, length of stay, discharge site, all-cause 7- and 30-day readmission rates, and 30-day mortality.
A total of 560 651 admissions were analyzed (41.9% men and 59.1% women; mean [SD] age, 80 [8] years). Patients' physicians were hospitalists in 59.7% of admissions; PCPs, in 14.2%; and other generalists, in 26.1%. Primary care physicians used consultations 3% more (relative risk, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05) and other generalists used consultations 6% more (relative risk, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.07) than hospitalists. Lengths of stay were 12% longer among patients cared for by PCPs (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.11-1.13) and 6% longer among those cared for by other generalists (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.07) compared with patients cared for by hospitalists. However, PCPs were more likely to discharge patients home (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.11-1.17), whereas other generalists were less likely to do so (AOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96). Relative to hospitalists, patients cared for by PCPs had similar readmission rates at 7 days (AOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.01) and 30 days (AOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04), whereas other generalists' readmission rates were greater than hospitalists' rates at 7 (AOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07) and 30 (AOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06) days. Patients cared for by PCPs had lower 30-day mortality than patients of hospitalists (AOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.97), whereas the mortality rate of patients of other generalists was higher (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.12).
A PCP's prior experience with a patient may be associated with inpatient use of resources and patient outcomes. Patients cared for by their own PCP had slightly longer lengths of stay and were more likely to be discharged home but also were less likely to die within 30 days compared with those cared for by hospitalists or other generalists.
医生在住院期间和出院后照顾患者的先前经验可能与患者的结局和护理模式有关。
研究在医院医生、他们自己的初级保健医生(PCP)或其他全科医生照顾的住院患者中,医疗保健资源的使用和结局的差异。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性研究分析了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,老年医疗保险患者中最常见的 20 种医疗诊断的入院情况。患者在入院前的 365 天内至少有一次与门诊临床医生的接触,且诊断仅限于最常见的 20 个诊断相关组。数据来自医疗保险 A 部分和 B 部分的索赔数据,从 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 1 月 31 日对结局进行了分析。
医生类型包括医院医生、PCP(即提供多数门诊就诊的医生)或全科医生(非患者的 PCP)。
住院期间专科会诊的次数、住院时间、出院地点、7 天和 30 天再入院率以及 30 天死亡率。
共分析了 560651 例入院(41.9%为男性,59.1%为女性;平均[标准差]年龄为 80[8]岁)。患者的医生是医院医生的占 59.7%,PCP 的占 14.2%,其他全科医生的占 26.1%。PCP 比医院医生多用 3%的会诊(相对风险,1.03;95%置信区间,1.02-1.05),而其他全科医生多用 6%的会诊(相对风险,1.06;95%置信区间,1.05-1.07)。与医院医生相比,PCP 照顾的患者的住院时间延长 12%(调整发病率比,1.12;95%置信区间,1.11-1.13),而其他全科医生照顾的患者的住院时间延长 6%(调整发病率比,1.06;95%置信区间,1.05-1.07)。然而,PCP 更有可能将患者出院回家(调整优势比[AOR],1.14;95%置信区间,1.11-1.17),而其他全科医生更不可能这样做(AOR,0.94;95%置信区间,0.92-0.96)。与医院医生相比,PCP 照顾的患者的 7 天(AOR,0.98;95%置信区间,0.96-1.01)和 30 天(AOR,1.02;95%置信区间,0.99-1.04)再入院率相似,而其他全科医生的再入院率高于医院医生,分别为 7 天(AOR,1.05;95%置信区间,1.02-1.07)和 30 天(AOR,1.04;95%置信区间,1.03-1.06)。与医院医生相比,PCP 照顾的患者的 30 天死亡率较低(AOR,0.94;95%置信区间,0.91-0.97),而其他全科医生的死亡率较高(AOR,1.09;95%置信区间,1.07-1.12)。
PCP 以前与患者的接触可能与住院期间的资源使用和患者结局有关。与医院医生或其他全科医生相比,自己的 PCP 照顾的患者住院时间略长,更有可能出院回家,但 30 天内死亡的可能性也较小。