Au Angel Hoe-Chi, Shum Kathy Kar-Man, Cheng Yongtian, Tse Hannah Man-Yan, Wong Rose Mui-Fong, Li Johnson, Au Terry Kit-Fong
Autism Partnership Hong Kong, China.
University of Hong Kong, China.
Autism. 2021 Feb;25(2):516-528. doi: 10.1177/1362361320967529. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
With professional training and regular opportunities to observe children interacting with their peers, preschool teachers are in a good position to notice children's autism spectrum disorder symptomatology. Yet even when a preschool teacher suspects that a child may have autism spectrum disorder, fear of false alarm may hold the teacher back from alerting the parents, let alone suggesting them to consider clinical assessment for the child. A valid and convenient screening tool can help preschool teachers make more informed and hence more confident judgment. We set out to develop a screening tool that capitalizes on peer interaction as a naturalistic "stress test" to identify children more likely than their peers to have autism spectrum disorder. A total of 304 3- to 4-year-olds were observed at school with an 84-item preliminary checklist; data-driven item reduction yielded a 13-item Classroom Observation Scale. The Classroom Observation Scale scores correlated significantly with Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 scores. To validate the scale, another 322 2- to 4-year-olds were screened using the Classroom Observation Scale. The screen-positive children and randomly selected typically developing peers were assessed for autism spectrum disorder 1.5 years later. The Classroom Observation Scale as used by teachers and researchers near preschool onset predicted autism spectrum disorder diagnoses 1.5 years later. This user-friendly 13-item Classroom Observation Scale enables teachers and healthcare workers with little or no clinical training to identify, with reliable and valid results, preschoolers more likely than their peers to have autism spectrum disorder.
通过专业培训以及定期观察儿童与同伴互动的机会,幼儿教师很有条件注意到儿童的自闭症谱系障碍症状。然而,即便幼儿教师怀疑某个孩子可能患有自闭症谱系障碍,对误报的担忧可能会使教师不敢告知家长,更不用说建议家长考虑带孩子进行临床评估了。一种有效且便捷的筛查工具可以帮助幼儿教师做出更明智、因而也更有信心的判断。我们着手开发一种筛查工具,该工具利用同伴互动作为一种自然主义的“压力测试”,以识别比同龄人更有可能患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童。我们用一份包含84个条目的初步清单在学校观察了304名3至4岁的儿童;通过数据驱动的项目精简得出了一个包含13个条目的课堂观察量表。课堂观察量表的得分与《自闭症诊断观察量表第二版》的得分显著相关。为了验证该量表,我们使用课堂观察量表对另外322名2至4岁的儿童进行了筛查。对筛查呈阳性的儿童和随机挑选的发育正常的同龄人在1.5年后进行了自闭症谱系障碍评估。在学龄前开始时由教师和研究人员使用的课堂观察量表能够预测1.5年后的自闭症谱系障碍诊断。这种便于使用的包含13个条目的课堂观察量表使几乎没有或没有临床培训的教师和医护人员能够以可靠有效的结果识别出比同龄人更有可能患有自闭症谱系障碍的学龄前儿童。