Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Cogn Emot. 2021 Mar;35(2):425-434. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1843407. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Deficits in cognitive flexibility have been associated with anxiety and worry, however few studies have assessed cognitive flexibility in the context of emotional stimuli (i.e. affective flexibility). The present study ( = 79) investigated whether individual differences in affective flexibility predict levels of trait anxiety and worry over a period of seven weeks. Affective flexibility was measured using a task-switching paradigm. Results showed that less efficient shifting of attention towards affective aspects of positive stimuli predicted higher anxiety over time. Additionally, more efficient shifting of attention away from affective towards non-affective aspects of negative stimuli predicted higher anxiety and worry over time. This latter finding may be understood by considering theoretical models and empirical evidence associating avoidance of negative information with increased anxiety. The effects were small and require replication in larger, representative samples, but they are an initial indication that anxiety may not be associated with general impairments in cognitive flexibility. Instead, our study emphasises the importance of breaking down cognitive flexibility into different components to investigate more nuanced relationships.
认知灵活性缺陷与焦虑和担忧有关,但是很少有研究在情绪刺激的背景下评估认知灵活性(即情感灵活性)。本研究(n=79)调查了在七周的时间内,情感灵活性的个体差异是否可以预测特质焦虑和担忧的水平。使用任务转换范式来测量情感灵活性。结果表明,积极刺激的情感方面的注意力转移效率较低,预示着随着时间的推移焦虑水平会更高。此外,从消极刺激的情感方面更有效地转移注意力到非情感方面,预示着随着时间的推移焦虑和担忧水平会更高。考虑到将回避消极信息与焦虑增加相关的理论模型和实证证据,可以理解后一种发现。这些影响很小,需要在更大的、有代表性的样本中进行复制,但它们初步表明,焦虑可能与认知灵活性的普遍缺陷无关。相反,我们的研究强调了将认知灵活性分解为不同成分以研究更细微关系的重要性。